Skip to content
Subscribe

Twitter Battleground: The Fight to End the Death Penalty on Twitter

Published:

In California, voters will be presented with a choice of whether or not to end the death penalty by voting for or against Proposition 34 this November.

According to the California Legislative Analyst's assessment, the passage of Prop 34 would save an estimated $100 million annually in the first few years and grow to about $130 million annually thereafter. Opposition to the California proposition relies largely on emotional appeal to the death penalty's deterring effect.  Focusing on narratives of families of murder victims, the Case Against Prop 34 is part of a campaign to preserve the California death penalty.

In an election where money plays such a large, and arguably disproportionate, role, it is important to look at the top donors and campaigns funding both the "Yes" and "No" campaigns. The top two funders are Nicholas Pritzker and the Atlantic Advocacy Fund, where their $6 million comes from 4,000 individual donors, all giving between $5 and $1 million. Californians for Justice and Public Safety falls far behind, only reaching $0.245 million. The "Yes" campaign has almost 25 times more campaign cash on board, which is reflected in their social media strategies.

death penalty on twitter

The Yes on 34 campaign has embraced a heavy social media strategy, using Twitter to interact, engage, and inform California Voters from the account @SAFECalifornia. The 1,000+ following is showcased frequently on the page with retweets and responses coming from the Yes of 34 manager. The account also taps into their audience by thanking supporters for their part in ending the death penalty, sharing videos and images, and tweeting out polls and statistics.

death penalty on twitter

On the other side, the No on 34 campaign has yet to create an active Twitter account, ignoring the importance of an online strategy in an era where more than 80% of eligible voters are online. While tweeting frequently, the VoteNO34 campaign has few interactions with followers. The account has under 100 followers.

While social media statistics are not the end-all be-all of a campaign, they are playing an increasingly important role in state and local elections. As November 6th nears, California voters are debating the merits of the death penalty on Twitter.

And in the fight to end the death penalty in California, every tweet counts.

Read all about Proposition 34 at IVN's Election Center.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Twitter Battleground: The Fight to End the Death Penalty on Twitter

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us