Campaign Finance Reform and the Rule of Unintended Consequences

image
Published: 17 Oct, 2012
1 min read

It seems like there is always a measure on California’s ballot that is more than what it appears. This year it is Proposition 32. Ballotpedia has credited the new Open Primary with transforming California into the state with the most competitive elections in the nation. But, Prop 32 would seriously undermine California’s nonpartisan open primary reforms.

Passage of This is because Prop 32 prohibits nonpartisan candidates from raising corporate and union contributions, but allows corporate and union cash to be funneled to partisan candidates campaigns through their political parties.

While the political campaign has focused on the Prop 32 core provisions aimed at limiting the ability of unions to aggregate small contributions through payroll deduction and what opponents have described as a loophole for SuperPACS, the “Political Party Loophole” would be far more troubling for independent voters and candidates.

Prop 32 continues the 30-year pattern of premising so-called “reform” on the pre-eminent power of the political parties. Ironically, Prop 32 perpetuates the very concentration of power that has created the partisan gridlock that most Americans blame for the deteriorating condition of our political process.

Prop 32 would decrease transparency by forcing corporate and union money into the backrooms of political party bosses. Political Parties already have immense power – even under the Open Primary. Prop 32 would make it almost impossible for candidates who do not get the endorsement of political bosses to run for office. And, the public will never see the money trail because the corporate and union contributions are simply “laundered” through a Political Party.

Unless you think making the two big parties even more powerful is a good idea, Prop 32 is, at best a well-intended, very bad idea.

-Steve Peace and Jeff Marston, Co-Chairs,  Independent Voter Project, Author of California’s Open primary

You Might Also Like

Group of people standing outside in DC.
Ranked Choice Voting Survives Delay Attempts in DC
According to reporting from The Washington Informer and WUSA9 (CBS), D.C. Councilmember Wendell Felder (D Ward 7) has withdrawn his emergency legislation that would have required the D.C. Board of Elections (DCBOE) to conduct a comprehensive needs assessment before implementing ranked choice voting (RCV) in 2026. Felder’s proposal did not receive enough support from his colleagues during the council’s December 2 legislative meeting, following a breakfast discussion earlier that morning....
04 Dec, 2025
-
3 min read
Bob Foster
Remembering Bob Foster
Independent Voter News is saddened to share the passing of Bob Foster, a trusted advisor to the Independent Voter Project and a longtime friend of our organization. He died on Sunday at the age of 78....
04 Dec, 2025
-
2 min read
Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read