Voter ID and Voter Fraud Do Not Compare

image
Published: 29 Aug, 2012
2 min read

Voter ID and voter fraud are often linked. But, a popular understanding of voter fraud, people posing as another individual on Election Day, was shown to be "infinitesimal" according to a study conducted by Arizona State University. Today Damon Eris posted an article on dev.us regarding the study and its results. The study covered years 2000-2012 and uncovered that 10 incidences of in-person voter fraud have occurred throughout the country during that time.

Voter fraud in this form would be combatted by requiring would-be voters to produce a voter ID when they attempt to vote. This would minimize the ability of individuals to fraudulently pose as another registered voter. As discussed briefly above, these requirements could disenfranchise 11% of eligible voters across the country. While this is a large percentage of the voting population the threat that is posed is not remotely similar to the disenfranchisement. The threat is that one individual is able to cast an extra ballot because a government-issued ID does not verify their identity. A wrongdoer would be limited by the time the polls are open and the geographic distance between them.

Regardless, the probability of a large group of individuals being able to cast enough fraudulent ballots, by posing as other people is extraordinarily low. When that threat is compared with 11% of eligible voters being disenfranchised by an ID requirement is, the costs of the ID laws severely outweigh the benefits. As the Brennan Center points out, the occurrence of this type of voter fraud is less likely than an individual being struck by lightning.

Voter fraud is a foolish move in the first place for individuals attempting to swing an election. The punishment for federal election fraud is 5 years and a $10,000 fine. The return on the risk is only a single vote.

Linking voter IDs and voter fraud is essentially comparing apples to oranges. If voter fraud at a scale that was remotely proportional to the amount of individuals knowingly disenfranchised by voter ID laws, a much stronger argument would be made for them. What Independents should understand is that the connection between voter IDs and voter fraud as a major threat to democracy is tenuous at best.

For more statistics on Voter ID related disenfranchisement visit the Brennan Center at NYU.

In The Next Segment: What creates the appearance of voter fraud.

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read