Baseball, Politics & Public Money

image
Published: 07 Aug, 2012
Updated: 21 Nov, 2022
2 min read

 

The item that follows is more than a baseball note. Baseball teams that play in ballparks funded in whole or part by public money are thereby inherently fair game for political comment and judgment:

Bill Center of the U-T San Diego reported last night on the newspaper's Web site, and confirmed in a major front page story today, the Padres have been sold for $800 million to the O'Malley family, generally celebrated in LA for their ownership of the Dodgers.

Walter O'Malley, the father and grandfather of the new majority owners, was a major figure in baseball history, as he and Horace Stoneham changed the game when they moved the Dodgers and Giants west to LA and SF in 1958.

How will the new out-of-town majority owners be received?

The reaction of most fans and media will focus on how much money will they spend?

My concerns are twofold, neither of which relates to spending money for high profile players. They are: 1) keeping Tom Garfinkel as president and CEO, and 2) the depth of the O’Malley’s civic commitment.

Center reports Garfinkel is staying, which is reassuring at the leadership level, given my strong feeling that changing out Garfinkel for people who know neither our town nor our team makes zero sense; and if Garfinkel is indeed staying, that’s reassuring and answers my second concern, civic commitment. (To be fair, Ron Fowler, who is a member of the new ownership group, along with golfer Phil Mickelson, is one of our city’s most generous benefactors.)

IVP Donate

I have no idea as to the O’Malley politics, but if they are as conservative as most baseball owners (the Red Sox are a notable exception), they will be well received by the business community of San Diego, which is conservative and Republican, but I repeat myself.

Besides, no one will care about their politics because there is nothing in their history to suggest that they, like Joe Ricketts of the Chicago Cubs, would ever get caught in a race baiting campaign to defeat President Obama. (The New York Times reported some months back that Ricketts was spending $10 million to fund a study to see how the president might be tied, a second time, to Reverend Jeremiah Wright.)

On the price of $800 to buy our hometown team, I have nothing to add. If you want an explanation it makes sense to ask someone who went to Wharton or Harvard.

On second thought, maybe not, because those are same people who brought us hedge funds.

 

Latest articles

CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read