UC Regents to hit students with more than just pepper spray

image
Published: 01 Dec, 2011
Updated: 13 Oct, 2022
3 min read

Pepper spray is far from the only stinging rebuke felt by students at UC-Davis and other UC campuses in recent weeks.  Regents of the UC system are currently considering tuition increases that could reach 16 percent, bringing the cost of an education from $12,000 to $22,000 per student by the 2015-16 academic year.  This fee is for tuition only, excluding room, board and other expenses such as books and special lab fees.

The UC Board of Regents blames the legislature for so severely cutting budgets on California’s premiere campuses that they have no choice but to shift the burden onto students and their parents.  However, a closer look at some of the pay practices by the Regents might make any “Occupy” crowd wonder about the sincerity of the Board’s complaints.

For example, according to a September 16 article in the Los Angeles Times:

“UC Davis Medical Center's chief executive, Ann Madden Rice, was given a $215,700 raise, upping her base salary to $800,000, to fend off a recruiting effort by another hospital. Rice is also eligible for $160,000 in performance-based incentives, according to UC documents.”

The article also reveals that the University’s chief investment officer, Marie Berggren, was awarded nearly $750,000 in bonuses by the Regents, bringing her annual cash compensation to $1.2 million.

No one doubts the contributions that these administrators have made to the university system, but in my view, they are not the star players on campus.  Those should be the college professors who actually transfer knowledge and wisdom to the students, but who rarely receive the types of salary increases of investment officers, chief executives and even athletic coaches.

As the argument goes, market value drives the salary of senior executives – whether in corporations, universities or non-profit agencies.  But not all of the Regents agree.

"I don't think we can afford to chase market salaries," said Regent Eddie Island in response to administrators' contention that Berggren's pay was on par with executives at other major public universities and lower than if UC had hired an outside fund manager.  His view was a minority opinion, however, as his was the lone vote against bonuses or salary adjustments.

The problem is not unique to the UC system.  Ohio State University just paid Urban Meyer – its new football coach – a $4 million annual salary plus bonus opportunities that will reward him at a level four times that of the University president.  The New York Times called Urban’s contract “the latest indication that the big business of college football is undeterred by the nation’s broader economic woes or by concern about the prominence of sports on campus.”

IVP Donate

Meanwhile, the UC Berkeley Daily Californian reports that most professors in the UC system received a 3 percent annual increase effective October of this year, with a small number of particularly outstanding faculty members receiving up to 6 percent.  Faculty groups have long complained that the largest growth in both positions and salaries have gone to administrative areas rather than teaching and research.

For the students of Occupy Davis and other college-based clones of the Occupy Wall Street movement, it is less about which administrators or professors receive an increase and more about the burden of paying for a college education.  For the nation, it is about the priority we place on paying whatever the market will bear for the glamor jobs of the university world.

Latest articles

CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read