Skip to content
Subscribe

Two Californians testify in DC against limited, misleading health insurance plans

Published:

At a Senate Commerce Committee hearing last week, Senators examined health insurance plans that offer minimal coverage to millions of Americans known as "mini-med" as these plans will remain available for a number of years despite violating the new rules under health care reform legislation.

Originally, mini-med plans were designed for low-wage Americans who could not afford comprehensive health insurance, yet would cover costs associated with a serious illness, or so was believed.  Unfortunately, many of these plans are designed to pay less than the amount they said will be covered.  For example, a health insurance policy may promise coverage of $50,000 annually, but when you read the fine print, the plan may severely limit the amount of coverage.  For two Californians who testified, that was certainly the case.

Eugene Melville of Riverside bought a limited health insurance plan from Aetna believing that the policy was capped at $20,000 annually.  When Mr. Melville was diagnosed with oral cancer, he was quickly informed that the plan only paid $2,000 in doctors' visits and care provided outside a hospital.  Jessica Lynn Carroll of San Jose had a similar experience with her Aetna policy after going to the emergency room when she lost feeling in one of her arms.  What Ms. Carroll found out was that the Aetna policy only paid $500 toward the bill and ended up with a $16,000 bill for her care.  According to Jessica, "In no way did I expect the bill that arrived.  If I had known the insurance I had in th first place was so absurd,  I would have never purchased it.

Echoing that sentiment was Senator Rockefeller (D-WV) noting that:

"More than a million Americans enrolled in these plans think they have health insurance to protect them from financial catastrophe if they become seriously ill or hurt.  In fact, they don't."

Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Ca) characterized the situation during the hearing saying that "mini-med plans often mislead consumers about the level of coverage offered."

Mini-med insurance plans made headlines when McDonalds threatened to pull health insurance coverage for its employees, telling the Obama Administration that the plans it offers employees would be unable to meet the minimum requirement that 80% of a health insurance company's expenses be directed toward patient care.  Moreover, the health insurance plans are also in violation of the health care reform law because it places a lifetime cap on coverage.  Today at McDonalds, employees pay $11 per week, or nearly $600 annually, for coverage that maxes out at $2,000.  McDonalds has requested a waiver from the new rules  - which it has been granted for one year - so it could continue to offer its current plans to its employees while the Obama Administration determines what to do with the mini-med plans.

In the meantime, millions of Americans will continue to be offered and covered by min-med health insurance plans for another three years until the exchanges are up and running in 2014. For those like Mr. Melville and Ms. Carroll with their thousands of dollars of medical bills, where is their waiver?

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Two Californians testify in DC against limited, misleading health insurance plans

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us