Fiscal scorecard: War on Terror vs. Health Care reform

image
Published: 11 Nov, 2010
Updated: 13 Oct, 2022
3 min read

The actual price tag of the War on Terror is much higher than commonly believed, while the estimated price tag of the health care reform bill is likely far too low based on historical precedent.  Republicans and Democrats don't like to admit as much, but history and hard data prove otherwise.

The 9-year War on Terror has actually cost about $1.5 trillion:  $1.1 trillion for the wars in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, and roughly $400 billion for the new Homeland Security federal agency.  By the 10-year mark, the War on Terror will likely rise to over $1.7 trillion, when incorporating estimated FY 2011 funding for Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Homeland Security. 

And these do not reflect all the costs associated with the War on Terror either.  Over 5,000 U.S. soldiers have died, over 30,000 have been maimed for life, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is prevalent in active and retired soldiers, the military is plagued by a record suicide rate, and unfunded liabilities for treating scores of war veterans are already surpassing original expectations.

In additon, while there has not been another 9/11 magnitude strike on U.S. soil, top security and intelligence officials claim that the number of terrorist threats against America has actually been increasing, despite spending more money and inserting more troops.

Finally, while there is no debate over the fact that America has every right to a robust self-defense, there are legitimate constitutional issues regarding the War on Terror.  In particular, despite operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen, the U.S.Congress has not officially declared war or issued Letters of Marque and Reprisal, as stipulated in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.  Back in World War II, the U.S. issued six different Declarations of War.

On the health care reform bill front, the CBO's recent addition put the estimated cost at $1.055 trillion over ten years.  If this estimate were to hold true, this would be approximately $600 billion cheaper than the War on Terror over a ten year period.  But, as history has aptly demonstrated with the actual costs of Medicare and Medicaid, the cost of federal health care reform will likely blow past this estimate, unless the bill is repealed in its entirety or in part.  The bill's constitutionality is also questionable, as the "general welfare" and "interstate commerce" defenses are already being challenged in federal court by a number of disgruntled States.

Democrats and other left-leaning proponents may choose to strictly focus on the estimated cost of the federal health care reform bill and proclaim fiscal victory, but they should also be aware that President Obama and a Democratic-controlled Congress (until January) have actually escalated the War on Terror and further boosted military spending to fund its expanding operations.  On the other hand, Republicans and other right-leaning proponents may choose to focus on the actual costs of Medicare and Medicaid as a more accurate indicator of federal health care reform's future price tag, but they should also be aware that the War on Terror has proven to be a budget buster with no end in sight.

In the end, whether it's war or health care, America is falling deeper and deeper into debt.  Both sides are borrowing from China and relying on the Federal Reserve to print money in order to fund their budgetary demands.  But, unless both sides stand down and resolve to reform health care and national defense in a more fiscally conservative manner, we may be facing an even worse economic crisis in the not-too-distant future.

IVP Donate

Latest articles

CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read