logo

Fiscal scorecard: War on Terror vs. Health Care reform

image
Created: 11 November, 2010
Updated: 13 October, 2022
3 min read

The actual price tag of the War on Terror is much higher than commonly believed, while the estimated price tag of the health care reform bill is likely far too low based on historical precedent.  Republicans and Democrats don't like to admit as much, but history and hard data prove otherwise.

The 9-year War on Terror has actually cost about $1.5 trillion:  $1.1 trillion for the wars in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, and roughly $400 billion for the new Homeland Security federal agency.  By the 10-year mark, the War on Terror will likely rise to over $1.7 trillion, when incorporating estimated FY 2011 funding for Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Homeland Security. 

And these do not reflect all the costs associated with the War on Terror either.  Over 5,000 U.S. soldiers have died, over 30,000 have been maimed for life, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is prevalent in active and retired soldiers, the military is plagued by a record suicide rate, and unfunded liabilities for treating scores of war veterans are already surpassing original expectations.

In additon, while there has not been another 9/11 magnitude strike on U.S. soil, top security and intelligence officials claim that the number of terrorist threats against America has actually been increasing, despite spending more money and inserting more troops.

Finally, while there is no debate over the fact that America has every right to a robust self-defense, there are legitimate constitutional issues regarding the War on Terror.  In particular, despite operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen, the U.S.Congress has not officially declared war or issued Letters of Marque and Reprisal, as stipulated in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.  Back in World War II, the U.S. issued six different Declarations of War.

On the health care reform bill front, the CBO's recent addition put the estimated cost at $1.055 trillion over ten years.  If this estimate were to hold true, this would be approximately $600 billion cheaper than the War on Terror over a ten year period.  But, as history has aptly demonstrated with the actual costs of Medicare and Medicaid, the cost of federal health care reform will likely blow past this estimate, unless the bill is repealed in its entirety or in part.  The bill's constitutionality is also questionable, as the "general welfare" and "interstate commerce" defenses are already being challenged in federal court by a number of disgruntled States.

Democrats and other left-leaning proponents may choose to strictly focus on the estimated cost of the federal health care reform bill and proclaim fiscal victory, but they should also be aware that President Obama and a Democratic-controlled Congress (until January) have actually escalated the War on Terror and further boosted military spending to fund its expanding operations.  On the other hand, Republicans and other right-leaning proponents may choose to focus on the actual costs of Medicare and Medicaid as a more accurate indicator of federal health care reform's future price tag, but they should also be aware that the War on Terror has proven to be a budget buster with no end in sight.

In the end, whether it's war or health care, America is falling deeper and deeper into debt.  Both sides are borrowing from China and relying on the Federal Reserve to print money in order to fund their budgetary demands.  But, unless both sides stand down and resolve to reform health care and national defense in a more fiscally conservative manner, we may be facing an even worse economic crisis in the not-too-distant future.

IVP Existence Banner

Latest articles

votes
Wyoming Purges Nearly 30% of Its Voters from Registration Rolls
It is not uncommon for a state to clean out its voter rolls every couple of years -- especially to r...
27 March, 2024
-
1 min read
ballot box
The Next Big Win in Better Election Reform Could Come Where Voters Least Expect
Idaho isn't a state that gets much attention when people talk about politics in the US. However, this could change in 2024 if Idahoans for Open Primaries and their allies are successful with their proposed initiative....
21 March, 2024
-
3 min read
Courts
Why Do We Accept Partisanship in Judicial Elections?
The AP headline reads, "Ohio primary: Open seat on state supreme court could flip partisan control." This immediately should raise a red flag for voters, and not because of who may benefit but over a question too often ignored....
19 March, 2024
-
9 min read
Nick Troiano
Virtual Discussion: The Primary Solution with Unite America's Nick Troiano
In the latest virtual discussion from Open Primaries, the group's president, John Opdycke, sat down ...
19 March, 2024
-
1 min read
Sinema
Sinema's Exit Could Be Bad News for Democrats -- Here's Why
To many, the 2024 presidential primary has been like the movie Titanic - overly long and ending in a disaster we all saw coming from the start. After months of campaigning and five televised primary debates, Americans are now faced with a rematch between two candidates polling shows a majority of them didn’t want....
19 March, 2024
-
7 min read