Obama administration and labor union allies proclaim victory in Arizona immigration ruling

image
Christopher A GuzmanChristopher A Guzman
Published: 30 Jul, 2010
2 min read

With a federal judge striking key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law, the Obama administration proclaimed victory along with labor union allies.  Labor unions have been some of the staunchest opponents of the Arizona law and strongest advocates of a fast track legalization process. 

Among these unions would be the UFCW and SEIU.  And their strong opposition to the Arizona law would seem to make sense from a political perspective.  Slower influxes of immigrants to the states would stunt membership growth, and slower membership growth equals a thinner cash flow for political causes, which typically leans democratic. 

The SEIU also recently released a video comparing television pundits and supporters of the Arizona immigration law to dictatorial-like oppressors. 

For an administration whose stated goal was to end partisan politics, its credibility may have been tarnished as it has seemingly aligned itself with groups demonizing the majority of Americans who support the law.  But, this also makes political sense in light of the fact that President Obama easily won the labor vote in 2008. 

Arizona governor Jan Brewer vowed that the fight isn’t over concerning this recent defeat in court.  "Illegal immigration is an ongoing crisis the state of Arizona did not create and the federal government has refused to fix," Brewer said. "SB 1070 protects all of us, every Arizona citizen and everyone here in our state lawfully." 

Arizona will seek an appeal on the ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court, based in San Francisco, is considered among the most liberal-leaning in the nation.  One way or another, the case was going to be headed in that direction as both parties involved in the lawsuit would have appealed the case had their respective side lost.  It could be a year or more before the case possibly reaches the Supreme Court. 

While comprehensive immigration reform might be necessary to some extent, the way the Obama administration is handling the matter doesn’t appear to be consistent with the general welfare clause in the U.S. Constitution, a clause often cited in its justification for national healthcare reform.  

It would appear that the current administration is playing the special interest political game, a business as usual approach that many hoped would change.

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

Will the Texas Republican Party be Successful Where the Hawaiian Democratic Party Failed?
Will the Texas Republican Party be Successful Where the Hawaiian Democratic Party Failed?
The Republican Party of Texas (RPT) is suing Secretary of State Jane Nelson in an effort to close the state’s primary elections to party members only – a move that the Democratic Party of Hawaii (DPH) tried back in 2013 in its state and failed. ...
05 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Retired Attorney Takes Voting Rights Case All the Way to the Supreme Court -- By Himself
The next big voting rights case the Supreme Court of the United States could consider wasn’t filed by the ACLU, the League of Women Voters, Common Cause, or another household name when it comes to voter rights. ...
09 Sep, 2025
-
5 min read
congress flag
Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians
There may be no greater indication that voters are not being listened to in the escalating redistricting war between the Republican and Democratic Parties than a new poll from NBC News that shows 8-in-10 Americans want the parties to stop....
10 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read