The War is Making You Poor Act

image
Published: 07 Jun, 2010
3 min read

Osama Bin Laden has repeatedly expressed his primary intent:  to bankrupt America.  Sadly, his methodology has caused the United States to spend over $1 trillion on the ongoing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. 

Originally, the Bush administration predicted Iraq would cost about $60 billion.  In just seven years, the war cost has exceeded $700 billion and counting.  In Afghanistan, we were told that U.S. forces would quickly oust the Taliban, rout Al-Qaeda, and capture Bin Laden.  Almost nine years later, the war has cost over $270 billion, and with Obama's recent troop surges, the cost is likely to continue soaring.

Since 2001, the federal budget has never been balanced.  The national debt has grown by approximately $8 trillion.  Exploding war budgets, under Bush and Obama, have undoubtedly contributed to the debt buildup and Dollar devaluation over the last decade.

In response, Alan Grayson (D-Florida) has authored HR 5353, The War is Making You Poor Act.  In a recent Huffington Post Op-Ed, Grayson outlines the rationale behind his new bill, which is already gaining bipartisan support.  Here are some of the highlights:

     The war in Afghanistan is now longer than World War I, World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War.  And President Obama is escalating it.

     Osama Bin Laden is applying the same strategy he utilized against the Soviet Union to bleed the U.S. treasury.

     The bill would force war funding to originate from the Pentagon's "base" budget, a mere $549 billion, instead of constantly tacking on "emergency" war supplementals that provide off-the-books financing.

     The resultant savings would help reduce the record budget deficits and eliminate federal taxes on the first $35,000 of income.

IVP Donate

Grayson's bill forces the hand of so-called fiscal conservatives in both parties.  By definition, record military budgets and open-ended wars increase the national debt, a debt that has just surpassed a staggering $13 trillion.  If war spending is not cut, U.S. debt will continue to spiral out of control.

On the other hand, if fiscal conservatives truly believe in unlimited financing for overseas wars in the name of national security, then their only other alternative is to make drastic cuts to domestic programs.  However, under Bush and a Republican Congress, Bush and a Democratic Congress, and Obama and a Democratic Congress, domestic spending didn't decrease; instead, it dramatically increased, leading to a unprecedented explosion of federal debt.

If fiscal conservatives in both parties wish to retain even an ounce of credibility, they should strongly consider Grayson's The War is Making You Poor Act.  As I wrote in a previous article, Europe's debt crisis could be a preview of coming attractions for America, our nation's financial day of reckoning may be rapidly approaching.  Unless federal spending is cut in all areas of the budget, we could soon be facing our own punishing debt disaster.

Before it's too late, let's return to a philosophy that favors quality over quantity, and fiscal responsibility over fiscal recklessness.  It's exactly what Osama Bin Laden doesn't want, and it's exactly what is needed to save our nation from an economic collapse.

 

 

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read