Coalition files lawsuit against State of California over public education finances

image
Published: 24 May, 2010
3 min read

A coalition of students, parents, school boards, and California educational organizations has filed a lawsuit against the state seeking to declare the current school financing system unconstitutional, and to direct the California governor and legislature to create a system that is "sound, stable and sufficient." 

Robles-Wong, et al. v. State of California was filed in Alameda County Superior Court on behalf of all state public schools and students. Named after Alameda High School junior Maya Robles-Wong, the plaintiffs include the California School Board Association, the California School Administrators, the California State PTA, nine school districts and sixty students and parents.



After $17 billion in recent cuts to the state’s education budget and years of questionable funding practices by the state that even put the state’s stimulus dollars at risk, the coalition felt it had no other choice but to follow states like New York seeking not money, but what is being cited as a rational system of state funding. 

According to press reports, California School Boards Association President Frank Pugh, a plaintiff in the case, stated that “California’s broken school finance system has denied students the education that they deserve for decades.  This lawsuit is a last resort. We cannot sit around idly and wait for the state to act when generation after generation of students are suffering the consequences.”

The state Constitution gives education financing a unique priority by requiring that "from all state revenues there shall first be set apart the monies to be applied by the State for support of the public school system.” The lawsuit argues that recent budget cuts have violated this requirement.



An education system that was once the envy the nation now ranks near the bottom nationally in spending per pupil, student-teacher ratio and academic achievement, and less than seven in 10 students graduate from high school.  Specifically:

    •    California spends $2,131 less per pupil than the national average, ranking 44th in the country.  

   •    California spends less per pupil than each of the largest 10 states in the nation -- almost $6,000 less per pupil than New York.

IVP Donate


    •    California ranks 49th among all states in student-teacher ratios; 46th in district officials and administrators; 49th in guidance counselors and 50th in librarians.


    •    Only half of all California students are proficient in English language and only 46% are proficient in math



Since Proposition 13 three decades ago, which transferred nearly all school financing from the local level to state officials, funding has become increasingly inadequate and a main driver of the state’s current crisis. In an effort to rectify the massive loss in dollars for public education, Californians passed Proposition 98, which ensured that school funding was a top priority for the state. Unfortunately, this move has done little to help the situation.



The governor’s office has vowed to fight the lawsuit. A press release issued by Governor Schwarzenegger's office stated that "The governor will oppose this lawsuit and believes the state will prevail. The funding of public education in California has long been and continues to be a top priority of California, even in bad economic and budget times."

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read