President Obama proposes cutting border security in 2011 federal budget

image
Published: 05 May, 2010
Updated: 13 Oct, 2022
2 min read

Possibly indicating what direction the president might lean on comprehensive immigration reform, the Washington Examiner reports that President Obama has proposed cutting U.S. border security as part of his 2011 budget.  This includes two specific provisions:



1. Reducing the amount of Border Patrol agents.


2. Cutting funding for a “virtual fence” along the U.S.-Mexico border, which is the technologically-advanced fence armed by several surveillance devices.



Overwhelmingly, Republicans do not see the current immigration reform effort as effective, labeling it as a blanket amnesty bill and as soft on other border-related crimes.  With this in mind, the right will likely paint the Democrats as weak on national security with the new cuts.



Meanwhile, in addition to portraying themselves as friendly to the Hispanic community, Democrats will likely play up the effectiveness of the administration’s decision.  In other words, more money does not equal less illegal immigration and border-related crime. In a sense, this may be true.



Then again, it might just depend on how those particular resources are allocated.  Illegal immigration activity still continues to this day despite increased funding for border patrol under the Bush administration.



So what is the Obama administration’s proposed solution?



With upcoming comprehensive legislation in play, the administration seems to be laying the foundation for passage by narrowing its efforts.   According to the Examiner, the administration will shift their money away from trying to catch illegal immigrants coming across the border of Mexico with California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.

IVP Donate



Instead, funds will go toward Border Enforcement Security Task Forces in non-border cities.  These cities include Honolulu Hawaii; San Francisco, California; and Massena, New York.  These task forces will seek to prevent illegal drugs from being dispersed by criminal organizations across U.S. borders.



This will most certainly delight advocates of a comprehensive immigration reform bill, some of whom recently chanted ‘No human being is illegal’ at the recent May Day rally in Washington DC and at similar rallies across the nation.



However, with this new approach, some might see that the mark is being missed by having less eyes on the border and more shifted inland to drug distributors.  Shifting enforcement to some major cities listed might work in a place like Florida, which does not border a foreign territory and does not provide easy access between countries.



But it most surely will not alleviate the crime occurring in states that border Mexico, where drug cartels cross over with fresh supplies on a frequent basis. 

Perhaps the true solution is not to abandon the federal role in immigration altogether.  After all, it is their constitutional responsibility.

Or rather, perhaps it is the role of the federal government to allow the states to have more control over their immigration enforcement.  For instance, the Arizona model of immigration enforcement already has some illegals leaving the state.



Perhaps California would also benefit from Arizona's model of immigration enforcement.

Latest articles

CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read