Politics and science shouldn't mix

image
Published: 29 Jan, 2010
Updated: 13 Oct, 2022
1 min read

Since receiving $3 billion in voter authorized bonds in 2004, the state's publicly-funded stem cell research institute has been beset by one controversy after another.  Wranglings with the legislature, potential conflicts of interest in the grant application process, and key questions regarding taxpayer investment have plagued the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine.

But, that's not all.

Just last month, Art Torres, who serves as executive director, received a tripling of his salary, after having served a mere nine months.  Not bad considering California is suffering from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.  Mr. Torres also happens to be the former head of the state Democratic Party.

As a result, the Citizens Financial Accountability Oversight Committee, has passed a resolution encouraging the research institute to adopt greater transparency in its business practices and grant application processes.  The resolution also urged board members and staff to post their statements of economic interest and travel expenses online.

While it remains to be seen if the institute will adopt these official recommendations, with billions of dollars of taxpayer money on the line and scientific credibility at stake, it would behoove the research community to distance itself from the politicization of bona fide scientific research.

Lately, the scientific community appears to be highly sensitive to those in charge of drafting and enacting critical public policy legislation.  "Climategate", the recent UN glacier report controversy, and now questions surrounding the state's premier stem cell* research center reveal a troubling trend. 

Good science demands accountability, objectivity, transparency, and perhaps most importantly, independence.  Political favors, special interest entanglements, and covert collusion with policy makers only serve to undermine quality science and honest legislative policy.

The time has come to disentangle science and politics.

* For CAIVN's latest coverage on stem cells, read here and here.

IVP Donate

Latest articles

US map divided in blue and red with a white ballot box on top.
Could Maine Be the First State to Exit the National Popular Vote Compact?
On May 20, the Maine House of Representatives voted 76–71 to withdraw the state from the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC), reversing course just over a year after Maine became the 17th jurisdiction to join the agreement....
04 Jun, 2025
-
3 min read
New York City
Nine Democrats Face Off in NYC Mayoral Debate as Ranked Choice Voting, Cuomo Probe, and Independent Bid from Adams Reshape the Race
A crowded field of nine Democratic candidates will take the stage tonight, June 4, in the first official debate of the 2025 New York City mayoral primary. Held at NBC’s 30 Rock studios and co-sponsored by the city’s Campaign Finance Board, NBC 4 New York, Telemundo 47, and POLITICO New York, the debate comes at a pivotal moment in a race already shaped by political upheaval, criminal investigations, and the unique dynamics of ranked choice voting....
04 Jun, 2025
-
6 min read
Elderly woman sitting in wheelchair staring out window.
Three Reps Put Party Labels Aside to Strengthen U.S. Role in Global Fight Against Alzheimer’s
Two California members of Congress, Ami Bera, M.D. (D-CA-06) and Young Kim (R-CA-40), introduced a bill Wednesday with Republican Pennsylvania Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick aimed at bolstering the US's global role in the battle against Alzheimer’s disease. ...
04 Jun, 2025
-
3 min read