Prop 1A? California Can't Even Sell Bonds it Already Authorized

image
Published: 03 Nov, 2008
2 min read

The passage of Proposition 1A will allow the state to sell bonds to fund a state-of-the-art high speed rail network that will send passengers from the top of the state to the bottom in hours. It will be quite the feat, considering this isn't Rhode Island.

But like most beautiful dreams, there's one more problem to add to the list: Regular state bonds aren't selling. The Sacramento Bee reports that the state's budget crisis is stalling bond sales--a terrible predicament for any government, especially a big spender like California.

The Bee reports,

The state issued $5 billion in revenue anticipation notes, or RANs, in mid-October. But it had to pay hefty interest rates of 3.75 percent to 4.25 percent – double the rates other states have paid recently – in part because of the state's shaky financial condition, and in part because of the large size of the issuance.

Since then, the estimated deficit has at least tripled from the $3 billion figure Finance Department officials came up with at the time, making the cost of issuing new notes problematic.

This new development in the state's inability to sell bonds to the public should probably make voters think twice about approving a new $9 billion bond measure.

Currently, the state owes more than $50 billion on infrastructure bonds and still has not even sold $68 billion in authorized bonds. To top it off, California is now paying $6.7 billion per year in principle and interest on bonds.

The state cannot even sell what it has already authorized, it's in a devastating budget crisis, and special interests are trying to get tax payers to authorize another $9 billion for a service that isn't even essential?

Even if the bill were to pass, the state won't even be able to sell the bonds to fund it.

IVP Donate

California is asking for a choo-choo train for Christmas, but it looks like Santa might never show up.

You Might Also Like

Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read
Utah state capitol.
Utah Judge Delivers a Major Blow to Gerrymandering
A Utah state judge has struck down the congressional map drawn by Republican lawmakers, ruling that it violates the state’s voter-approved ban on partisan gerrymandering and ordering new district lines for the 2026 elections....
11 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read