Utah’s Online Voting System
By Matt Metzner on 09/14/2012 in internet election, internet voting, online election, online voting, Utah with 28 CommentsRead Time: 2 - 2 minutes
In 2009, the US Senate passed the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act. The MOVE Act was an addition to the National Defense Authorization Act of that year and required states to ensure that the votes of all US troops deployed overseas be counted during an election. States took various paths toward ensuring that our troops would be able to participate in the elections taking place at home in 2010. Utah chose to implement online voting for service members deployed overseas from their state.
Other options included traditional absentee ballots where deployed service members are required to fill out paper ballots and return them by mail. This option is difficult for many military members overseas because the post can take much longer to be delivered and returned. Paper ballots for military members can become such a large hurdle that some troops will not request the ballots at all. Virginia alone has seen a 92% drop in requests this year.
By choosing to use an online voting system instead of a paper ballot, troops can vote from any on-base computer terminal and know that their vote has been counted, and counted on time.
Aside from its accessibility another stroke of genius of an online voting system lies in the use of preexisting registration forms and ballots. Utah based military personnel who had already filled out absentee forms were granted access to an online ballot instead of being sent and returning a paper ballot. Ideally, using existing forms allows electioneers to pass on collecting physical signatures from voters. But, under the new Utah plan, a service member is still required to sign a verification form and return it via mail to the Secretary of State in Utah. Regardless of the hurdle, 100% of participants preferred using an online ballot if it were offered again.
In The Next Segment: The best arguments against online voting systems.





Leave Your Comment →
28 Comments
Fred Gollatz
09.16.2012
That should keep the process honest..Really? OOps sombody must have had static in their shoes. Cant rig that..Sarcasm..
Lucretia Lulu Talley
09.16.2012
Hec yeah.. Our troops deserve the best we can give them!!
Mike Liberto
09.16.2012
I have faith in the technology but no faith in the potential manipulation of an electronic system.
Joseph Alexander
09.16.2012
Online voting would work as long as the systems used are secure and there is a method for verifying results (you know, making sure they’re not tampered!)
Jess Kalinowsky
09.16.2012
and why would this not be a viable option for every citizen. Everyone feels like the Internet is “The Second Coming” anyway, why not have it for voting for every Citizen this is a Registered Voter? The Registration process would have top security and checks and balances, and would be exactly the same in every State, and Territory, and every voting precinct.
Deborah Johnson
09.16.2012
NO … votes can be altered, lost and replaced…. and when the company that will be doing the vote counting is in SPAIN AND OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS… you know it won’t be anything but CORRUPT! (GOOGLE: George Soros+Scytl )
Dr. William J. Kelleher
09.17.2012
@DrWJK
Deborah Johnson: Beware of misinformation! Soros is NOT an owner of Scytl. Scytl provides evoting services all over the world. It wouldn’t dare tamper w/ even ONE vote – because the company would go out of business only days after the news came out. I did the search on Scytl + Soros
Vinciente Verrazzano
09.16.2012
As much as I want our troops to get the votes they are entitiled to; I believe that this system would be too easy to manipulate the count or create fraudulent votes which would undermine the very purpose of letting them vote this way in the first place.
Laura Ladd
09.17.2012
Hackers would have a blast messing with it!
Melissa Rodriguez
09.17.2012
Debbie: Yep, the GOP NEVER manipulates votes in the electronic machines……
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2008/01/company-connect/
Lynn Baker
09.17.2012
it would have to a very secure site, have responsible people on both ends making sure that the voters are registered, legal IDs , etc… and that the votes received are counted correctly and not ” accidentally” erased because the winner was someone that person did not like …
Jimmy Rose
09.17.2012
Use paper
Penny D. Jahn
09.17.2012
Risky but our Military has the RIGHT to VOTE!!!
John Heilman
09.17.2012
Absolutely – can’t believe we don’t already have one standardized, electronic system and that we still use the antiquated, highly variable systems that we do!
John Cary
09.17.2012
Banks do a great job of keeping our money in the right account. I’m sure we could devise a reasonably safe and secure tool to record votes.
Arthur Anthony
09.17.2012
I’m a Vet from the VietNam era, and I’m not sure how to vote on this one. Although it may be a good thing, it does have a large list of possible down falls. I think reserach and trials are in order!
Dr. William J. Kelleher
09.18.2012
@DrWJK
Arthur – see my series on Internet Voting in Canada. Nearly 50 cities have done it – w/o security glitches. Is that enough trials?
Toddy Ruttman Kloos
09.17.2012
Yes, all people serving the U S of A should be able to vote online, whether here in the US or overseas…………
Brandon Magoon
09.17.2012
No! Computers are great for a lot of things but voting isn’t one of them. The potential for fraud is just to high and there’s no real way to avoid it.
Steve Amacher
09.17.2012
We should all be able to vote online. In fact, we should be able to vote on bills this way instead of Congress. If we can do banking online, then why can’t we vote using the internet? There are security measures that can be implemented to permit this.
Scott W. Trent Jr.
09.17.2012
Nope, too many “evil Hackers” out there!!
Carol White
09.17.2012
Makes me cautious, Utah does not come to mind with equality
Matt Metzner
09.17.2012
The technology is there to operate an election securely online. It takes a series of firewalls, both online and offline to make sure the vote is accurate. Paper ballots are susceptible to fraud as well, but I’ve covered that issue fairly well in the column, concluding that it doesn’t exist. The most difficult part of the move toward online election systems lies with the people not with the technology.
Melody Osorio
09.17.2012
BOTH. Paper ballots can be cross checked with electronic votes.
An itemized receipt of the electronic votes be sent to the local ballot location at the close and compared with the paper ballots there.
All paper vote totals be reported to a central independent firm not affiliated with the electronic vote and recounted for the grand total of paper ballots.
The electronic votes cumulated by a second independent entity and reported to the third Independent firm not affiliated or associated with either previous firm to count and compare paper and electronic vote totals.
Security can be breached, the human factor can be corrupted in one instance, maybe two, third times the charm.
Dr. William J. Kelleher
09.17.2012
@DrWJK
How can we know that Utah’s online voting system is secure and trustworthy? Natalie Tenant is West Virginia Secretary of State. She’s our country’s leading expert – with REAL EXPERIENCE using the technology. She used Internet voting in 2010. She explains why she and all the overseas military who used it, loved it. Also see the debate in the comments.
http://www.govtech.com/e-government/Making-the-Case-for-Online-Voting.html
You can trust her!
CyberTheVote
09.17.2012
@CyberTheVote
Why not indeed? Why don’t we have online voting in the U.S. elections when it works so well in other countries and in the private sector? The answer has nothing to do with any technical barriers whatsoever.
Countries that have embraced online voting do not have the entrenched election administration industry that exists in the U.S. This industry sees online voting as an existential threat to that industry, as it should. A more centralized, automated (and much less expensive) voting system will do away with the need for much of the current industry – from the people who work the polls and count (and Recount) the paper ballots, to the “election integrity organization” industry that accompanies our election process.
What upsets me is to see this industry stand in the way of the tool that can free the United States from the status quo of low voter participation.
Roger Fowler
09.19.2012
i think we need to get politicians out of washington make them stay in thier districts.use new technology to conduct business.
Larry Fowler
09.21.2012
Roger, Oh no you don’t. I don’t need partisan politics “grid-locking’ the Internet. It has less to do with where they are than with who they are. It is the reason we try, or should try, to teach children not to run away from their problems, because wherever you go, there you are. I do agree with crafting a way to return national governance to the part-time endeavor it was meant to be though.