Republicans Blame Gary Johnson, Third Party Candidates For Loss
By Shawn M. Griffiths on 11/07/2012 with 19 CommentsRead Time: 3 - 4 minutes

In presidential elections, especially since 2000, it is a knee jerk reaction for members of the party that lost to blame third party and independent voters. After the results of election night, some Republicans blame Gary Johnson and other third party candidates for Mitt Romney’s loss in key battleground states.
Do Republicans have an argument to make?
Virginia
99.5% of precincts reporting:
- Barack Obama – 1,852,123
- Mitt Romney – 1,745,397
- Gary Johnson – 30,003
- Virgil Goode – 13,442
- Jill Stein – 8,357
One of the biggest concerns for the Romney campaign was Virgil Goode’s impact on this race. Goode has only secured roughly .4% of the vote. It is Goode’s home state and Governor Johnson has more votes than he has. The difference between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in Virginia is 106,726. Combined Johnson and Goode took a total of 43,445.
Verdict: Obama would still win Virginia.
Ohio
99.7% of precincts reporting:
- Barack Obama – 2,672,302
- Mitt Romney – 2,571,539
- Gary Johnson – 48,672
- Jill Stein – 17,657
The difference between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney is 100,763. Gary Johnson did not even get half that.
Verdict: Obama would still win Ohio
Colorado
76.8% of precincts reporting:
- Barack Obama – 1,199,142
- Mitt Romney – 1,100,186
- Gary Johnson – 30,821
- Jill Stein – 6,609
- Virgil Goode – 5,610
The difference between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney is 98,956. Of the battleground states, Gary Johnson is doing the best in Colorado, garnering 1.3% of the vote with just over three-quarters of the precincts reporting in. The state he is doing the best in is his home state, New Mexico, where he has 3.8% of the vote. Combined, Gary Johnson and Virgil Goode took 36,431 votes in Colorado.
Verdict: Obama would still win Colorado
Florida
100% of precincts reporting:
- Barack Obama – 4,129,360
- Mitt Romney – 4,083,321
- Gary Johnson – 43,479
- Jill Stein – 8,676
This is the closest race in the country, and election officials have stopped counting ballots in some areas. The difference between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney is 46,039. It is the closest Gary Johnson comes to matching the difference, but still the math doesn’t add up.
Verdict: Though the state has not been projected, no matter who wins it, third party candidates are not to blame for one candidate losing to another.
The argument that third party voters and independent voters who chose someone other than the mainstream candidates cost one candidate the election over the other stems from a partisan belief that a vote for a Gary Johnson, or a Jill Stein, or a Virgil Goode is a wasted vote.
It also stems from the belief that Gary Johnson supporters would have voted for Mitt Romney if Johnson was not in the race. Most people who voted for Governor Johnson did so because they genuinely supported him and his message. There is no guarantee those voters would have supported Mitt Romney if Johnson was not in the race.
The beauty of democracy in America is that everyone eligible to vote gets a vote. It may not be for the winning candidate. It may not be for a Republican or a Democrat. To the voter, however, it is their vote and if they are satisfied with their decision, then it is not a wasted vote.





Leave Your Comment →
19 Comments
Thomas G. Brown
11.07.2012
@tgbreport
The vote count in Pa was as follows for President. Romney 2,581,357 , Obama 2,865,690 , Jill Stein 20,463 , 48,150 Johnson so the Republicans can not blame the lost on those folks who voted third party as Romney lost by 284,333 votes.
Alex Gauthier
11.07.2012
@alexg
pundits that were criticizing the third party candidates for stealing votes don’t get to speculate the next time around
Zachery Abramson
11.07.2012
@zabramso
This is a great break down that really shows how flawed the argument against third party candidate is. Though it’s disappointing that Gary Johnson was so far away from his 5% goal, I think that the Republican party needs to evolve as opposed to placing the blame on others.
Cassidy Noblejas Bartolomei
11.07.2012
@cassidynb
^ these are the exact same points I’d like to make.
Thanks for the coverage, Shawn!
Blake Bunch
11.07.2012
@blakebunch
Johnson’s turnout in Ohio is impressive. Definitely had an impact on the election.
W. E. Messamore
11.07.2012
@W__E__Messamore
These are facts. This is real journalism. Thanks, Shawn.
Richard Apley
11.07.2012
Could it be that more Americans are thinking with their head instead of just buying wholesale what the 2 major parties are spewing? I would like to think that this could be a wake up call for ALL Americans as well as the messed up 2 party system.
Emma Goda
11.07.2012
@emmagoda
I love how the republicans want to blame someone for their loss.
Candy Barr
11.07.2012
Yes, in this case, I am sure we can all be assured that Romney and the Republicans legally raped themselves.
Jote' Thompson
11.08.2012
In Florida Ron Paul received thousands of write in votes. 357 in my county alone. Add that to Gary Johnson’s and we changed the course. Yes, I’m bragging!
Jim M
11.08.2012
Romney received 2 million LESS votes than McCain did in 2008.
Obama receive almost 8 million LESS votes than he did in 2008.
The fact is that many don’t vote because they don’t see a real difference between the two “choices”.
Bob
11.08.2012
“some Republicans blame Gary Johnson and other third party candidates for Mitt Romney’s loss in key battleground states”
Really? Which ones? Nice Straw Man. Good integrity.
Kim
11.12.2012
Yeah, but how many voted for Obama more than one time? How many dead people voted for him? There are entire precincts in the Philly and Cleveland areas in which Romney got no votes. What’s the likelihood that fraud was an issue there?
Rose Martinez
11.19.2012
Please unsubscribe me — I clicked on “unsubscribe” and it took me to a new window that did not have a way to unsubscribe. Thank you.
Robert B. Winn
11.20.2012
The Democratic Party was started in the 1830′s by Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren as a pro-slavery party. Democrats and Republicans still regard voters in the United States as their slaves, believing that they have secured unto themselves an exclusive right to be elected to public offices. Minor parties will not be able to break the stranglehold of two-party corruption. It will have to be done by independent voters running as independent candidates. That seems impossible to independent voters in many states, but it is going to happen, nevertheless. We have essentially one party government in the United States again, similar to the condition that existed after the election of 1800. The Republican Party will not recover from its loss in this election. Republicans evolved from the Federalists, National Republicans, and Whigs, which were patterned after the Whig Party of England. The main difference in this one party domination as compared to the election of 1800 is that this time voters are leaving political parties and registering independent, whereas, in 1800, voters were changing from independent voters to political party members. By 1860 there were not enough independent voters to stop party contentions from escalating into Civil War.
zumba dvd
04.09.2013
http://eletroelitegames.com/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=7148
insanity
04.09.2013
http://dusuncegucu.org/members/nendoffilia/
insanity
04.09.2013
http://buzzedforum.freehostia.com/index.php?action=profile;u=3159
Isabel marant sneakers
04.09.2013
http://dusuncegucu.org/members/bubhaulkgueva/