First-Time Unemployment Claims At Two-Month Low
By Shawn M. Griffiths on 09/27/2012 with 9 CommentsRead Time: 2 - 4 minutes
Credit: beyond.com
Applications for jobless benefits dropped substantially during the week ending September 22. The advance seasonably adjusted figure was 359,000, which is a decline of 26,000 from the previous week’s revised 385,000. First-time unemployment claims are at a two-month low.
The 4-week moving average, considered a less volatile number, decreased 4,500 from the revised average of 378,500 from the week ending September 15. The insured unemployment rate continues to be at a statistical stalemate as it remained steady at 2.6 percent. The seasonably adjusted insured unemployment figure for the week ending September 15 was 3,271,000. This is a decrease of 4,000 from the week before.
The initial unemployment claims report for the week ending September 22 is good news for economists and analysts looking for a significant turnaround from the beginning of the month when jobless claims increased dramatically. Lackluster improvement during the preceding week didn’t do much to boost confidence.
Layoffs have not only fallen to the lowest levels in two months, but recent data also indicates that layoffs are now at their lowest levels in a decade. However, slow mending in the labor market is a result of poor figures for the hiring side of the labor market. Job growth is not enough to keep pace with population growth, and gains in the market are not enough to have a meaningful impact on the unemployment rate.
The current unemployment rate is at 8.1 percent. At face value, the rate has been at its lowest levels since the early months of 2009. The bad news is that unemployment is as low as it has been because so many people, identified as “discouraged workers,” have left the labor force completely which means they have stopped looking for work. The good news is we are seeing consecutive months of job gains. It is just not adequate growth.
One of the biggest concerns with regards to outlook in the labor market is that the economy is not growing fast enough to encourage companies and job creators to hire. Unfortunately, the already sluggish growth during the second quarter was revised down from 1.7 percent to 1.3 percent, which can help better explain the underwhelming job gains in August.
Economists speculate GDP could grow by two percent in the third quarter. However, that is still not enough growth to help hiring efforts. The Federal Reserve is hoping their latest bond-buying program will spur growth in the economy and, by extension, job creation. Only time will tell how much of an impact QE3 will have on the labor market.
The two-month low in applications for unemployment benefits is a notable sign of further improvement on the layoffs side of the labor market. Experts speculate that as long as the figure of initial jobless claims remain under 375,000 there is a good chance that hiring efforts may be strong enough to result in significant growth for the month.





Leave Your Comment →
9 Comments
Matt Metzner
09.27.2012
@mmetzner
This is good news. We didn’t expect the rebound to come as quickly as the drop.
Emma Goda
09.27.2012
@emmagoda
It is great that we are seeing consecutive months of job gains.
Cassidy Noblejas Bartolomei
09.27.2012
@cassidynb
Here’s hoping!
Also, “One of the biggest concerns with regards to outlook in the labor market is that the economy is not growing fast enough to encourage companies and job creators to hire.” -This seems to be a circular issue! Creating jobs is dependent on the economy and the economy is dependent on the existence and success of jobs.
Jane Susskind
09.27.2012
@jsusskind
The president can provide incentives to keep jobs in the US, to encourage small business to hire, provide tax refunds for business who hire etc. which could help boost the economy. I don’t think job creation is solely dependent on the economy.
Shawn M. Griffiths
09.27.2012
@shawntx
Many economists will tell you that the best job creators are consumers. If consumer confidence is up then the economy will likely grow and employment will rise. However, consumer confidence is shaky because of the slow recovery and the job numbers. Yes, there has been a vicious cycle in this recovery. Also, government leaders can help, but gridlock in Washington is preventing that from happening.
Jane Susskind
09.27.2012
@jsusskind
So I don’t follow jobs & unemployment that much, but I just came across this article: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/27/jobs-revision-show-that-obama-has-created-jobs-overall.html
If it’s true, it means that 125,000 net new jobs had been created since Obama’s been in office, contrary to the previous numbers that show a net job loss. What do you think?
Shawn M. Griffiths
09.27.2012
@shawntx
Obama and Democrats continue to tout 4.5 million jobs created since the president took office, which is true. However, this does not account for net total, which as the Daily Beast reported is significantly lower. However, the adjustment to the BLS figures emphasizes the point that we are seeing improvement despite what some are publicly telling people just to score political points. Obama will, no doubt, continue to talk about 4.5 million jobs (even though it is 4.4M) because that sounds better than a net total of 125,000. Obama’s opponents, as Romney is already doing, will focus on the drop in median income and how slow the recovery has been.
Terri Harel
09.27.2012
@tlharel
The number are very misleading. Unemployment statistics exclude discouraged workers AND people who are working fewer hours than they wish to work (aka they have a part time job but wish to work full time). So much more emphasis needs to be made on preventing people from becoming “discouraged” and dropping out of the labor force all together. This not only allows politicians tout false improvements in the economy but reduces the number of skilled workers available for employment (and we are very short on skilled laborers). The Fed’s actions are not encouraging enough to businesses for them to open up to hiring…
CNN recently reported: “There were 453,000 fewer young adults with jobs in August than in July. But despite that plunge, only 27,000 more young people were looking for new jobs.” The unemployment rate of young adults from June to July actually rose. It’s now around 16.8%. That’s pretty sad when these 16-24 year olds should be gaining experience to become the future of America. Not good news.
Alex Gauthier
09.28.2012
@alexg
Strange how people that are unemployed, don’t get counted as such merely by the fact that they’ve given up.