First-Time Unemployment Claims Unexpectedly Rise Again
By Shawn M. Griffiths on 08/23/2012 in congress, department of labor, economy, Fiscal Cliff, Jobless, Labor Market, unemployment rate with 28 CommentsRead Time: 3 - 4 minutes

The number of first-time unemployment insurance claims rose again last week by 4,000. The seasonably adjusted initial claims was 372,000 in the week ending August 18. The 4-week average also rose from 364,250 to 368,000.
As reported last week, the number of initial jobless claims continues to fall between the 350,000 to 400,000 range we have seen this year. Analysts still expect modest job creation for the month, but the uneven numbers from week-to-week suggest that mending in the labor market is still too slow to make a significant impact on the overall unemployment rate.
The seasonably adjusted insured unemployment rate for the week ending August 18 was 2.6%. This rate has remained unchanged for the last three weeks, but is down from this time last year when the rate was at 3.0%.
The unexpected rise in unemployment claims means uncertainty over the current state of the economy will likely continue for both consumers and job creators. The labor market is looking better than it did a month ago, but it is recovering too slowly to boost confidence. It is difficult for many consumers to look at the labor market from the proper perspective when there are economic burdens that distract them such as rising gas prices.
If these numbers continue like this until the end of the month the unemployment rate will likely remain in the statistical stalemate it has been in for the past few months. We are in the slowest economic recovery in our nation’s history, and there hasn’t been anything substantial to improve market outlook among voters.
Some reports indicate that the Federal Reserve might take action to spur economic growth if the job numbers in August are not enough to indicate a notable improvement in the market. Economists at the Fed could reveal a bond buying program to stimulate economic growth, but we will not know until their next meeting in mid-September.
The approaching US “fiscal cliff” also has some worried about how the slow-to-recover labor market will be affected. The term ‘fiscal cliff’ is used to describe the combination of tax hikes and spending cuts that will go into effect in January due mostly to Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill refusing to work together. This includes $1 trillion in automatic spending cuts and the expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts across all tax brackets.
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office released a report on Wednesday that analyzed the impact the “fiscal cliff” will have on the economy. Their findings suggest that we will see significant improvement in the national deficit, but the country may also go into recession and the unemployment rate will rise to about 9%.
Economists believe that sizable growth in the labor market by the end of the year could soften the impact these tax hikes and spending cuts will have on the projected market outlook if members of Congress continue to do nothing, but there has yet to be any sign that job growth will see dramatic improvement in the near future.
For now, it is important to remember that we are seeing improvement. We continue to see persistent job growth. It is just too slow at the moment to have a noticeable impact.





Leave Your Comment →
28 Comments
Dan Richards
08.23.2012
@danrich
To many are miscalling this Job Market growing, when in fact it is unstable. When you have an unstable Job Market, you either have an Unstable or collapsing economy. I tend to think it is an unstable Economy, due to the impact our Government has had on it, to keep it from actually healing and recovering.
If the Government does not stop these costly and ineffective programs they are doing, the economy will return back to collapsing again.
SolutionOriented
08.25.2012
Really??? Did it ever occur to you that corporate America is seeing record profits and paying some or none of the lowest effective tax rates, still there is anemic hiring? It doesn’t occur to you that with unemployment at 18 million and those who’ve given up or are under employed at some 8 million and with proposed tax cuts resulting in some 10 million more unemployed government and subcontract workers that there is in fact no way for government to “stablize” the jobs market? Why don’t our law makers have better ideas than simply pointing fingers?
Dan Richards
08.26.2012
@danrich
“Did it ever occur to you that corporate America is seeing record profits and paying some or none of the lowest effective tax rates, still there is anemic hiring?”
Yes it is a smart move on their part. Not one we the people who must work like, but at least it will help most of them stay a float through this. If the economy was more stable, then yes they would hire more, and invest more; but when it is not, then they must make move to keep their business afloat or lose it and put many more out of work.
Even with that said, and many businesses doing just this, we are still seeing many going under of different sizes. Just not strong enough to ride the bad economy, or making to many wrong moves like hiring what they need instead of enough to get by for now thus they go under. They are looking at increased taxes due to the healthcare bill, around 35-37% to businesses, or more, plus for medical industry, there will be increased operational costs they will have to invest in.
Businesses are not going to spend more than they feel they can recover, and this includes labor. If there is a good chance that the economy will crash again, then they are going to be very guarded with spending, and that is exactly what we are seeing. And it is more stable and effective to move a business production plant to an overseas location,m than it is here. Here you have a Government that is to busy working on personal projects and keeping the economy unstable, and Unions that work to financially hurt businesses and keep a corrupt Government corrupt.
So the Blame should be placed where it is most deserved. And this does not mean there are no businesses that are not utilizing the situation to their benefit, I just don’t believe it is as bad as the leftist media would have you believe.
Kent Schisler
08.25.2012
Aren’t jobs still being moved overseas? WHY aren’t Americans buying AMERICAN cars & equipment? Wouldn’t that create NEW JOBS in AMERICA, building cars?
Rob Lira
08.25.2012
Ron Paul is the only one not kicking the can down the road….
Shannon Black
08.25.2012
Neither of the two fools at the top.
Hal Dunn
08.25.2012
Ron Paul, of course. Even the independent analysts have reported this, but then the media just says “he’s a nut.”
Michael A. Keough
08.25.2012
Here’s some info to process in your voting decisions:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/index.php?ql3
Top Contributers For Barack Obama (D)
1 University of California $491,868
2 Microsoft Corp $443,748
3 Google Inc $357,382
4 DLA Piper $331,715
5 Harvard University $317,516
Michael A. Keough
08.25.2012
Here’s some more info to process in your voting decisions:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/index.php
Top Contributers For Mitt Romney (R)
1 Goldman Sachs $676,080
2 JPMorgan Chase & Co $520,299
3 Morgan Stanley $513,647
4 Bank of America $510,728
5 Credit Suisse Group $427,560
Michael A. Keough
08.25.2012
NOTE: The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organizations’ PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals’ immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.”
Michael A. Keough
08.25.2012
In other words the big money “may” very well “include” a “Corporate Person-hood” Super PAC and Company Subsidiaries and Affiliates type shell-game of funding”!
James C. Webb
08.25.2012
None of the above
Jimmy Rose
08.25.2012
Buy a car here parts made in Mexico & equiptment. The only thing banks are expanding there credit sheet on now is Treasury bills.
Kirk Coleman
08.25.2012
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012
Pat Kennedy
08.25.2012
1929-1949 was a faster recovery?
Maria Rosario
08.25.2012
Obama had 4 years,, Romney needs his chjance,,
Dave Mckay
08.25.2012
Our economy is doing great!! Just ask any illegal. Free medical, schooling,(including college) jobs out the yang, and much, much more. Both parties should be so proud of themselves. Not to mention all our tax-supported funds we ship to allies such as Egypt, Libya, Haiti and many others!!! I’m so thrilled at the prospect of either one of these canidates leading our country I could just ****!!!
Kirk Coleman
08.25.2012
We can not afford 4 more years of Obama!!! ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!!!
Russell Taylor
08.25.2012
Gee it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out The lie political wars and the war on terror are exactly what is sinking our country, they have driven oil prices through the roof, they WASTE oil resources, they create cost upon cost like a growing snowball. there are a lot of urgent needs here at home, such as addressing the water problems in America related to floods and drought. Jobs could be created here at home by building water pipeline systems and reservoirs, to move water as needed across the country. The two parties in control have only proven ONE thing, that have failed, in just about every way possible. Only FOOLS and accomplices would support EITHER party of tyrants, traitors and economic terrorists at this point. They have projected dreams and promises for the last 100 years, and have made good on nothing.Time to get ALL the third parties into the mix , at least they don’t have track records of massive failure and 16 TRILLION dollars worth of damage to prove it.
Leo Zicc
08.25.2012
wouldnt it be nice if voting for your congressman and senator were more important a vote than for who is president? smoke and mirrors come in the form of social agenda and no social issues will mean a damn if we dont get the population back to work.
Thomas Jay Wasserberg
08.25.2012
vote the war pigs out! vote for anybody who isn’t a republican or democrat. a vote for romney or obama is a vote for another hundred years of perpetual warfare.
Kirk Coleman
08.25.2012
Subject: MITT ROMNEY
Just some facts about Mitt Romney that we will not hear about from the media!
Mitt Romney:
After going to both Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School simultaneously, he passed the Michigan bar, but never worked as an attorney.
As a venture-capitalist, Romney’s first major business deal involved investing in a start-up office supply company with one store in Massachusetts that sold office supplies. That company, called Staples, now has over 2,000 stores and employs over 90,000 people.
Romney or his company Bain Capital (using what became known as the “Bain Way”) would go on to perform the same kinds of business miracles again and again, with companies like Domino’s, Sealy, Brookstone, Weather Channel, Burger King, Warner Music Group, Dollarama, Home Depot Supply, and many others.
Got your calculators handy? Let’s recap.
Volunteer campaign worker for his dad’s gubernatorial campaign 1 year.
Unpaid intern in Governor’s office 8 years.
Mormon missionary in Paris 2 years.
Unpaid bishop and state president for his church 10 years.
No salary as president of the Olympics 3 years.
No salary as MA governor 4 years.
That’s a grand total of 28 years of unpaid service to his country, his community and his church. Why? Because that’s the kind of man Mitt Romney is!
And in 2011 Mitt Romney gave over $4 million to charity, almost 19% of his income….Obama gave 1%
Joe Biden gave $300 or .0013%
This is real character vs….well you know what!
Romney may not be the best representative the Republicans could have selected. At least I know what religion he is, and that he won’t desecrate the flag, bow down to foreign powers, or squander my money on vacations. I know he has the ability to turn this financial debacle that the “Spending President” has gotten us into. We didn’t know that when Obama said he’d give us change, he meant nickels and dimes, and he would get the big bucks. We won’t like all the things necessary to recover from this debt, but someone with Romney’s background can do it.
But, on the minus side, He never was a “Community Organizer”, never took drugs or smoked pot. Never got drunk. Did not associate with communists or terrorists. Nor did he attend a church whose pastor called for God to damn the United States.
Bill Jurkovich
08.25.2012
We cannot afford one more day of the obstructionist Tea Party congress. Send them all home. Yes, yours and mine too. Both the baby AND the bath water!
Nancy Peterson
08.25.2012
GO MITT!!!
Paul Vachon
08.25.2012
unexpectedly? you’ve got to be kidding me!
Kirk Coleman
08.25.2012
We couldn’t even afford Obama’s first 3 3/4 years, MUCH LESS 4 MORE YEARS of his BS!! Everyone here ought to go see the movie, ’2016 Obama’s America’!!! This movie will enlighten you and let you know more about Obama, and he’s says he was going to be the most transparent president!!! LOL …….. Romney/Ryan 2012!!!!
Tom Terrell
08.25.2012
This is not a question for the “person at the top.” This is a question about the system under which we live. Our economic organization necessitates periods of boom and bust. Workers are simply cogs in the machine and when it isn’t running, you shut it down. It is not a system that addresses needs of the many, it simply addresses the wants of the few. Until we reorganize the economy that benefits the multitudes, we will see this time and again. Capitalism thrives on self-made crises and each one will be deeper and longer than the one before.
Oh, and Kirk, all that “community service” is easy to do when you come from money and don’t have to work. The same goes for charitable contributions. Simple percentages do not tell the whole story. Government is NOT a business. They run on different operating systems. It’s a fundamental difference that many don’t understand.
Craig Sechrist
08.25.2012
I thought this page was for independent thinkers and their dialogue. not a bunch GOP stooges talking out the side of their necks….