Death of US Ambassador Chris Stevens Brings Libyan War Home
By Carl Wicklander on 09/17/2012 in al qaeda, Barack Obama, blowback, Chris Stevens, John Kerry, Libya, mitt romney, Mohammed el-Megarif with 26 CommentsRead Time: 4 - 7 minutes
(Photo: US State Department)
On the eleventh anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the death of US ambassador Chris Stevens and three other diplomats left the American people and press reeling. The diplomats were killed amid demonstrations in Benghazi, Libya, the symbolic center of the 2011 resistance to dictator Moammar Gaddafi.
The initial reaction from the media focused on the release of a controversial film entitled, Innocence of Muslims, with excerpts available on YouTube that negatively portray the Prophet Mohammed as an adulterer and pedophile.
While there have been protests of the movie in at least 20 countries, Libyan National Assembly president Mohammed el-Megarif denied that protests of the movie led to Stevens’ death when he said, “The way these perpetrators acted and moved . . . this leaves us with no doubt that this was pre-planned, determined.” After a rush to convict the movie, media outlets eventually began connecting the significance of the date to the attack.
The US embassy in Cairo immediately released a statement denouncing, “the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims.” This move caused Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney to say, “the Obama administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.” The White House disavowed the “apology,” and Wednesday morning President Obama delivered a statement saying, “We must unequivocally oppose the kind of senseless violence that took the lives of these public servants.”
While there has been no statement from any al Qaeda organization claiming responsibility for the attack, the use of rocket propelled grenades is a hallmark of one of its attacks, and al Qaeda in Yemen praised it as a “great event.” On “Face the Nation” Sunday morning, President Megarif said that “about 50” have been arrested, although the interior minister disputed that number. Megarif also said some of the suspects were not Libyan and were affiliated with al Qaeda.
On September 11, 2012 Washington’s intervention in Libya came home for the first time. What had once been called a “bloodless” intervention because no Americans were killed in its execution, now has its first casualties with the deaths of US Ambassador Stevens and others.
Now Libya is becoming another instance of “blowback,” the term coined by the CIA for the unintended consequences of an operation. Originally justified to protect the civilian population from Gaddafi’s tanks, the NATO operation ultimately helped the rebels to topple Gaddafi which allowed extremist elements to prevail in Libyan politics and society.
Libya is also another example of the Washington practice of switching sides. For many years Moammar Gaddafi was an enemy of the United States and the person President Reagan called the “Mad Dog of the Middle East.” In 2003, Gaddafi agreed to relinquish his arsenal of biological and chemical weapons and began assisting the US in the War on Terror. However, once Gaddafi faced a serious regime crisis in 2011, President Obama’s decision to “lead from behind” led to Gaddafi’s ouster and lynching.
As early as two weeks into the operation of providing NATO air cover to “prevent a genocide,” NATO commander James Stavridis admitted that al Qaeda may be part of the opposition. As part of its modus operandi, al Qaeda prefers to move into lawless regions in order to create havoc as witnessed in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, and now Syria and Libya. The fact that many of those arrested for this crime were not Libyan adds fuel to the speculation that this was an al Qaeda attack.
For the first time in at least a generation, Democrats can feel they have a foreign policy edge over the GOP. In response to the rhetorical question of whether Americans are better off today compared to four years ago, Massachusetts senator and 2004 presidential candidate John Kerry boasted at the Democratic National Convention, “Why don’t you ask Osama bin Laden if he’s better off now than he was four years ago!” and “Today, without an American casualty – Muammar Qaddafi is gone and Libya is free.”
“Free” may end up a relative term after the death of US Ambassador Chris Stevens. A number of variables remain at work in Libya, but the seeds of this unfortunate incident were planted beforehand.




Leave Your Comment →
26 Comments
Pham Binh
09.17.2012
@phambihn
“which allowed extremist elements to prevail in Libyan politics and society.”
False. Libya’s Islamicists failed to win any seats in the new legislature. The moderates prevailed. Their recent attacks on religious shrines and the assassination of the U.S. ambassador is a sign that they have no popular support what so ever.
Pham Binh
09.17.2012
@phambihn
If extremist elements prevailed in Libya society, how does the author explain all the Libyans who rushed to help the Ambassador (and the ones who were killed trying to defend him)?:
http://news.yahoo.com/video-shows-libyans-trying-rescue-us-ambassador-194148880.html
http://www.nowlebanon.com/NewsArchiveDetails.aspx?ID=435745
Robert E. Grisby
10.03.2012
Easy After death comes the doctor. Where were they before the embassy was stormed and people died? Did they launch the rocket and clean up the mess? That’s sure what it looks like from here. Anybody even reportedly standing up to the protesters? Let’s kick the ballistics. Two trained Navy Seals and an Air Force Special OPS guy were killed in that assaulted and nobody died with them. They had to be ordered to stand down or you’d still be counting bodies over there. We sent six to get Bin Laden.Now tell me again about all the help they got.
Chandler Stalvey
09.17.2012
Our interventionin Lybia had little to do with these senseless murders.
Webster Carlin
09.17.2012
That sums it up pretty well. Sean Smith was a friend of mine.
Matt Johnson
09.17.2012
We leave the planet of the apes and come home to Disneyland.
Dieter Der Blaue
09.17.2012
Right? Utter tripe.
Aaron Camp
09.17.2012
Right, they just “hated Chris Stevens because he was free”? C’mon people, WAKE UP! Our global policing is the #1 recruitment tool of extremists. The tragedy is that we never learn. Defense is different than militarism. The counter-terrorist specialists call this “blowback”.
Kevin Driscoll
09.17.2012
The only Candidate that is a NON-Interventionist on the majority of the States Ballots is Gary Johnson. If we could just stop meddling. . .
Peggy Spencer Fitch Preece
09.17.2012
How true!
Matt Johnson
09.17.2012
We are 900 years ahead in societal evolution . That’s all. You can’t expect people to go from the Crusades to the Beatles overnight . We didn’t .
Robert E. Grisby
10.03.2012
True Matt. They also have to want to go forward.
Philip Katcher
09.17.2012
What operation in Libya? We supplied support to alllied air forces during the civil war there and haven’t been involved in any operations there after Ghadiffy’s death.
Lynn Baker
09.17.2012
just because stevens was the US ambassador doesnt mean he was the target of the killings …
Richard Boehme
09.17.2012
What boggles my mind is that the admin still says it wasn’t premeditated. The movie was out for 2 months prior. The attack was a classic guerilla assault which takes training & forethought. They knew where the safe house was & had other info about the compound.
J Go Huskers
09.17.2012
@J Go Huskers
I don’t think Obama lead from behind on Libya. We are/were already in in 2 Wars. Qadafi failed to see the writing on the wall!
Robert E. Grisby
10.03.2012
You’d think waking up in the middle of the night with F16′s firing rockets into your bedroom window would be enough but nooo.
Sharon Mooningham
09.17.2012
The movie is an excuse for these countries to attack the US. This has nothing to do with the movie.
Wayne Hays
09.17.2012
It is the excuse the govt needed to invade, pure and simple.
Ernie Knopp
09.17.2012
why do we keep supporting these animals?
Lynn Baker
09.17.2012
September 14, 2012 at 8:51 am
UN Secretary General Attends Tehran Meeting Despite White House Wishes
by Kaleb Bennett
Myth: Obama is the stronger candidate on foreign affairs.
Fact: Two weeks ago, 120 nations showed up in Tehran for a meeting of the Non-Aligned Movement — against U.S. entreaties not to attend. Even the U.N. secretary general attended — after the administration implored him not to. Charles Krauthammer, at National Review
….Whoa, why wasn’t this a major news story? Oh, wait that’s right the mainstream press is completely useless.
Robert E. Grisby
10.03.2012
Lynn, not useless, controlled. Why would you need to attend an UN anything when you’re creating a New World Order? All 120 of those nation will be included in the New World Order. Obama is the stronger candidate in foreign affairs because in his world there are no foreigners. One World One Government.
Christopher Hood
09.17.2012
Um… War?
Cliff Parker
09.18.2012
Ambassador Rice says they love us. It was that pesky movie. Don’t worry about that Death to America stuff. They just didn’t like the movie. They be cool with us. Just keep sending all that money and those cool Abrams tanks. Then we all be cool.
Robert E. Grisby
10.03.2012
noting the sarcasm,,,,,nice! If it was the movie would do they keep watching it? If it upset them that much, get ready for the sequel!
Naomi Took
09.30.2012
“War has all the characteristics of socialism most conservatives hate: Centralized power, state planning, false rationalism, restricted liberties, foolish optimism about intended results, and blindness to unintended consequences.” Joseph Sobran
No matter your political philosophy the “blindness to unintended consequences” seems bi-partisan here.