Three Races Could Turn California Reform into National Movement
By Jeff Marston on 10/10/2012 in Abel Maldonado, Bill Bloomfield, Eric Swalwell, Henry Waxman, Lois Capps, open primary, Peter Stark with 18 CommentsRead Time: 3 - 5 minutes
Did California’s Open primary make a difference? No question it did. Ballotpedia has credited the reform for taking California from last in the nation with competitive races to first. It will take three or four election cycles to really see the effects of open primary. But, three California Congressional races have special symbolic value that could turn the California reform into a national movement.
That these races are even happening is historic. If one or more of the three Open Primary advocates should win, it could dramatically accelerate the pace of change in California and the appetite for non-partisan reform throughout the country.
1. California CD 15: Eric Swallwell (D) v. Peter Stark (D)
Eric Swalwell
California’s new Open Primary has created an opportunity for an independent thinking young Democrat to unseat one of the most partisan and controversial members of Congress. Pete Stark, despite years of “odd” behavior would have cruised to victory under the old system. But, fellow Democrat Eric Swalwell now gets to face him one on one in the November election after finishing in the top two in June.
Independent voters will likely decide the outcome of this one and Swalwell has credited the Nonpartisan Open Primary with creating the opportunity. By contrast, Stark opposed expanding independent voting rights and sports one of Congress’ most intensely hostile personalities and partisan voting record.
2. California CD 33: Bill Bloomfield (D) v. Henry Waxman (D)
Bill Bloomfield
Independent candidate Bill Bloomfield leads a pioneering effort to unseat one of California’s most partisan Congressman in the 33rd Congressional District. Bloomfield walked away from the Republican Party after years of active involvement. He has historically differed with the Party on social issues, but ultimately chose to leave the Party after witnessing the intensification of partisan intransigence in the last Congressional term.
Bloomfield is a founding member of the bipartisan, national No Labels movement, supported California’s Nonpartisan Open Primary, and has waged an independent campaign that has a very real chance to win in November.
3. California CD 24: Abel Maldonado (R) v. Lois Capps(D)
Abel Maldenado
The Santa Barbara Independent gives a very fair profile of both candidates. The race between Abel Maldonado and Lois Capps is one of those that simply could not have happened but for California’s new Open Primary.
This is because the moderate Maldonado would have never survived a closed Republican primary. It is this fact that has made this seat, and many others in California, competitive in the general election. Maldonado, of course, also deserves credit for standing up to hard line Party leaders to help give California voters the right to change their electoral system to one less subject to manipulation by Party bosses.
Abel Maldonado has a track record of independence. He voted for the Open Primary, he took tough votes to break gridlock over the budget, and he stood his ground even when threatened by powerful interest groups backing his own Party.





Leave Your Comment →
18 Comments
Lucas Eaves
10.10.2012
@lucaseaves
Even in California, not everybody knows about the open primary, even less outside California but with famous incumbents loosing, this would send a strong signal to DC making the open primary known better.
Matt Metzner
10.10.2012
@mmetzner
The level of competition and number of races will increase as the reform is implemented in several elections. This is a great start for open primaries in CA the impact will likely grow in 2014.
Terri Harel
10.10.2012
@tlharel
This is amazing and really a step forward for democracy. The more we can break down partisanship and look deeply at the issues at hand, the better chance we have at national progress.
Alex Gauthier
10.10.2012
@alexg
Though California was not the first to institute open primaries, it’s seen as a bell-weather for the nation when it comes to politics. I suspect more and more states will adopt the measure in the near future
Cassidy Noblejas Bartolomei
10.10.2012
@cassidynb
From what I understand, I appreciate the effects of California’s new open primary system. As a student of history, however, I always get nervous when one movement dismantles old institutions… I am hopeful though that the right people, which our local, statewide, and national communities need, will fill the vacuum that will slowly open up
Blake Bunch
10.10.2012
@blakebunch
Refreshing that these candidates have taken aim towards independent voters. As a result of partisanship, as in Bloomfield’s case, they have taken the initiative to associate with people instead of parties.
Jeremiah Warwick
10.11.2012
Nichole!!!
Barry Short
10.11.2012
Definitely dislike “top two” open primaries – they discourage competition. But weighted voting, where you rank each candidate in order of preference? That, I could get behind.
Greg Bard
10.11.2012
@Barry Ranked preference voting has the same problem that Instant run-off voting has– they are not mathematically sound. That is unacceptable. Simple majoritarianism (known pejoratively as “top-two”) is the single best elective system. All accounts are that it increases competition, BTW. We should be very grateful for proposition 14. It was basically a miracle. It does NOT take away choice either. You have an open nonpartisan primary, so there is no crying about that.
Michael Thompson
10.11.2012
The “top-two” open primary is a joke. Get rid of it. It is destroying third parties in CA, has not resulted in more moderate candidates and helps keep the corrupt two party clowns in power.
Greg Bard
10.11.2012
@Michael This system is the only chance that third parties have. You can’t complain about not winning from third place. If a third party gains enough support to be one of the two, then people will vote for them, in some cases for the first time.
S Chad Peace
10.11.2012
Michael Thompson You’ve said the top-two is a joke and just blindly assert that its destroying third parties and there are no moderate candidates. According to Ballotpedia California went from the least competitive to most competitive elections after the open primary. Further, Both parties have been fighting non-stop in court to try and defeat the new open system. Why would they be trying so hard to fight it if it wasn’t a major blow to their institutional power?
Wes Alderson
10.11.2012
I support the Californai non-partisn pimary concept!!!
David Benham
10.11.2012
One need look no further than Bill Bloomfield to view the open, top two scheme as a great success. Under the old system, he would be just get third place, splitting the non-Waxman vote. Now he might actually win!
Michael Thompson
10.12.2012
You need to look at Richard Wingers statistics on this. Top Two did not work as advertised.
Chad Peace
10.12.2012
@Chad_Peace
I am very familiar with Winger. He is a very nice guy and well-intentioned. He is a staunch advocate of proportional voting and sees top-two as a threat, rather than a stepping-stone to progress. Maybe he is right about proportional representation, but even so, in the short-term, what we have now is better than what it was before.
Top-two did not work “as-advertised” depends on what advertisers you were listening to. If you were listening to Winger and the politicos, Top-Two was about moderates, independent candidates, and voter turnout. But if you listen to the people who actually wrote the bill (and no, they aren’t from NY), Top-Two is about Voters, accountability, and competitive elections. And by Ballotpedia’s account, California has gone from the least to most competitive elections in a single election cycle. I think the proponents of Top-Two have the edge.
Top-Two Proponent talking about the measure: http://ivn.us/2012/03/25/ivn-co-chair-steve-peace-talks-independent-voters-with-nbc/
Ballotpedia Press Release re: CA most competitive elections: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/california-leads-nation-with-most-competitive-elections-massachusetts-finishes-last-169163516.html
Michael Thompson
10.12.2012
S Chad, Top Two was created by two party clowns and pushed by some power hungry folks from New York pretending to be “independents”.
Chad Peace
10.12.2012
@Chad_Peace
Can you substantiate that? Top-two was written by the independent voter project, hardly a NY based operation. Why would the two parties keep challenging the measure in court if what you say is true?