Why 5% matters to Gary Johnson
By Lucas Eaves | 11/01/2012 | Ballot Access, Elections 2012, Electoral Reform, President | 36 CommentsGary Johnson’s latest ad is asking voters to “cast a protest vote that counts” by helping reach him 5 percent of the popular vote.
The Johnson’s campaign says, “5 percent of the votes ends the two-party abuse and allows Libertarian candidates equal ballot access and federal funding. “
This not exactly accurate.
Winning 5 percent of the popular vote will not give the Libertarian candidate direct ballot access in all 50 states in the next election, as the ad insinuates. States control the election processes, and each of them have different rules regarding the requirements to have a third party candidate’s name on the ballot.
These state requirements will have to be met again in the next election, regardless of Gary Johnson’s results this year. However, as Johnson is already on the ballot in 48 states and a write-in on another (Oklahoma is the only state excluding him from the ballot), the financial rewards reaped from reaching 5 percent will most likely allow him to access the ballot in all fifty states in the next election cycle.
For many third party candidates, resources, in both time and money, prevent them from appearing on a majority of ballots. Third party candidate Ross Perot, one of the most well known third party candidates, was on the ballot in 50 states in 1992 and 1996 because he was a billionaire who had enough resources to meet all the requirements.
In terms of financing, 5 percent will radically change the Libertarian candidate’s hand in the next election. Indeed 5 percent is the milestone set by the Federal Election Commission to be eligible for the Presidential Election Campaign Fund’s grant. The amount of public funding available to the minor party candidate is based on the the ratio of the party’s popular vote in the preceding presidential election to the average popular vote of the two major party candidates in that election.
If the libertarian candidate in the 2008 election had received 5 percent of the vote, Gary Johnson would have received approximately $9.5 million from the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. As of today, Governor Johnson has raised $2.3 million for his campaign, more than three times less than what he would have started with. If he had the additional grant money, he could have been on the ballot in every state, and would have been able to pursue a larger scale campaign.
By reaching 5 percent of the popular vote, Gary Johnson will secure approximately $10 million for the Libertarian candidate in the 2016 election. For a third party candidate, this is significant and justifies Gary Johnson’s recent quest to give him five.






Leave Your Comment →
36 Comments
James
11.01.2012
As I understand it, the truth lies somewhere in between.
Yes, you are correct that ballot access is determined by state. However, as I understand it, the presidential election is the basis for every state, with some allowing additional races (e.g., Senate) to count as well. I also believe that although the minimum percentage needed for major party status is different in each state, none of them is higher than 5%. So, properly stated, 5% in all 50 states would give access in all 50 states for 2016. But, that is a mouthful for a 30-second ad. LOL.
Jane Susskind
11.01.2012
@jsusskind
That extra $10 million could go a long way for a third party candidate. I think his “5%” message will resonate with a lot of voters who buy into the “wasted vote” argument. This way, losing the election isn’t a loss – it’s a step towards 2016
Matt Metzner
11.01.2012
@mmetzner
The goal isn’t impossible. I’d love to see Gov Johnson reach 5%, the road to breaking partisanship is long and uphill, but this would be a great step forward.
Chad Peace
11.01.2012
@Chad_Peace
These thresholds may be necessary, but they should also be uniform and fair. As it stands now, its a wonder how Johnson got on so many ballots and that he even had money left to produce anything.
Emma Goda
11.01.2012
@emmagoda
I would love to see a third party candidate receive 5 percent of the vote. I had no idea that if they did then then would receive funds for the next presidential election.
Blake Bunch
11.01.2012
@blakebunch
This was a great message to get out before election day. “Leveling the playing field” so to speak, allowing third party candidates equal funding, would truly enhance democracy in this country.
Michael Higham
11.01.2012
@michaelhigham
Gary Johnson’s speeches and messages are powerful, makes you want to do something! The 5-percent is another reason why voting third-party is not a wasted vote. Third-party candidates can build upon success of past elections. Voters can’t give up just because one election wasn’t revolutionary or entirely successful.
Michael Higham
11.01.2012
@michaelhigham
and I love his peace sign at the end of the video.
Alex Gauthier
11.01.2012
@alexg
it’d be great to see at least one other candidate get his/her hands on money that’s been reserved for the two main parties for so long
Roger Winkler
11.01.2012
I doubt he will reach the 5% threshhold
Kenneth Labbe
11.01.2012
The Legal Case Against the Obama Admin, the CBC, CPC, Marxists, Communists, AFL-CIO, Trumka, Sweeney, complicit media, mafia, clergy, UN, IMF, Blair, LaGarde et al – https://www.facebook.com/groups/291201734315413/
Robert Joseph Lake III
11.01.2012
That just allows the worst candidate to be re-elected.
Kat Palmer
11.01.2012
I think 5% will swing he election one way or the other
Robert Joseph Lake III
11.01.2012
No 5% will swing it only one way as ethnically most are voting by color.
Steve Stratton
11.01.2012
This election is too important to file a protest vote against the current corrupt system. We need to eliminate the 5% rule or put in place non-partisan elections to have a truly open election system.
Ken Moellman
11.01.2012
Remember that this race is an Electoral College race. If he pulled 10% in states like California and New York, which are solidly Obama, it would be a huge raw number of votes for Johnson without changing the result at all.
Sean MacDowell
11.01.2012
I’m predicting 15%
Wizzle Hizzle
11.01.2012
He’s got my vote!! If you are in michigan please vote for Scotty boman for senate!
Susan Chunco
11.01.2012
I’m voting for Jill Stein but not as a protest. I believe her to be the best candidate. Isn’t that why we vote?
Daniel Bartelme
11.01.2012
I don’t know about others who are brave enough to vote Johnson or any other 3rd party , but to me it does not matter if Obama of Romney wins.They are not the direction that needs to be taken to get this great nation on track. Call us spoilers. Tell us we lost the election for you. We don’t care. We are Libertarians and will not apologize for it.
Barbara Chapman
11.01.2012
Independent voter for Romney
Paul Yankowskas
11.01.2012
He’ll get this Granite Staters vote…
Peggy Shannon Crawford
11.01.2012
NO—we cannot afford to make any indepentent votes. We need Romney for the next 4 years. Johnson is NOT on the ballot!
Michael D Doran
11.05.2012
@michael_d_doran
In Oklahoma, and is write in, in Michigan. But the rest of the country he is on there.
Debra Idlelies
11.01.2012
For all of you saying you think he will get <5%, you need to do some research. Any third party candidate will be lucky to get 5%.
Glen Matthew Clifton
11.01.2012
I like Jill stein but Gary has a better shot and more support. (Is she even on all the ballots?)
Michael D Doran
11.05.2012
@michael_d_doran
I don’t know the exact count but i’m pretty sure its over 30
Glen Matthew Clifton
11.01.2012
Vote for Romney if your rich or don’t read. He has a lower job growth than any other as gov….except NJ Chris Christie. He’s a liar, he’s changed his views 46458855479 times in the passed 7 years to suit the crowd he’s preaching to and will pollute the earth badly. Why do you think big oil Koch bros are dumping millions into his campaign? Wake up and read real books
Alison Burks Putman
11.01.2012
Sorry but not this time! It’s too close and I’m highly opposed to a Romney rule! I’m voting for Obama!
Kevin Driscoll
11.01.2012
Do you really think Voting for the Lesser Evil Works? Look at what its got us. . .NEVER ENDING WAR, CRONY CAPITALISM, AND LESS FREEDOMS!!! Vote for Gary Johnson and make a statement.
Lana Gail Osborne Dearing
11.01.2012
Absolutely
Paul Yankowskas
11.01.2012
@Glen Matthew Clifton – Dr. Stein is not on the ballot in New Hampshire.
Jerry Kosch
11.01.2012
To all of you people who say this election is to important to vote for anyone but a republican or a democrat, and you can vote third party next time. This is an asinine excuse, there will NEVER be a next time because every election will be “the most important election of our lifetimes.” I’m voting for Gary Johnson this time, so that the general voting public will see that there is a real choice.
Nona Eggerman- Windus
11.01.2012
@peggy. We do not need Romney for 4 years or at all ! What we so need is a person who cares more about his country than his bank account.
Victor Marinelli
11.01.2012
wow, what part of “Independent” don’t you partisan nut-jobs understand?
Jack P.baggelaar
11.02.2012
Vote for Romney.he is the only person with any business and common sense.Obama has only stupid professors with no business experience.he
Wants to ruin our economy and then we will all be on food stamps.