In Battleground Colorado Independents May Have the Last Word
By Kate Morris | 10/26/2012 | Elections 2012, Headline, President, States | 22 CommentsIn a loft just outside Downtown Los Angeles, Meghan Leuders, is packing up her things. The recent Tufts University graduate is headed to the airport to embark on a two month internship in Ghana.
But her mind is focused elsewhere. This week, early voting began in her home state of Colorado. She flies in just a couple hours, and yet her absentee ballot is blank and unsent.
Four years ago, Leuders would have voted immediately. This is the same young woman who keeps an unabridged copy of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America in her glove compartment.
“I should vote,” she sighs, “It’s just that I don’t believe in what either candidate has to say.”
Leuders is not alone. Youth involvement in this year’s election is distinctly less enthusiastic than it was four years ago. Back in 2008, the momentum behind Obama’s winning campaign was largely backed by a college-educated, politically-aware generation.
But it’s more than just a disillusioned youth at play here. Leuders marks a trend of increasingly indecisive voters hailing from Colorado specifically. In February, NPR released a prescient, Colorado-focused piece in which it showcased the findings of moderate think tank, Third Way:
“In Colorado, the percentage of registered Republicans and Democrats rose slightly since 2008, but at a much slower pace than the rate of newly declared independents.”
On the early campaign trail, both candidates paid close attention to the usual swing states. They went out of their way to hit key cities in Florida, Virginia, Ohio, Iowa, and Wisconsin. All the while, the West went largely overlooked, but after Obama’s lackluster performance in the first presidential debate earlier this month, he lost his already-fragile grip on the Rocky Mountain state. Colorado has emerged on the map as anyone’s game.
Now, with Election Day fast approaching, major news outlets are beginning to recognize Colorado as an highly-strategic battleground, one that could very well dictate who wins this upcoming vote.
Both candidates recognize it. After Sunday’s final debate in Boca Raton, Mitt Romney left Florida to circle back across the country. Obama’s motorcade followed close behind.
On Tuesday evening Romney hosted a massive, high-energy rally at the Red Rocks Amphitheater in the hills just outside of Denver. In the center of the dramatic open-air arena, Romney placed his hand over his heart, graciously accepting the cheers of his Colorado supporters.
“We’re on the home stretch now,” Romney told onlookers in a rare moment of public emotion, “I think the people of Colorado are going to get us all the way there.”
He’s not too far off. Twenty-four hours after Romney rocked the Red Rocks, Obama’s entourage rolled up to City Park and packed it with comparable crowds. Both candidates spewed stump rhetoric, marveling at Colorado’s greatness, its patriotic spirit, and beautiful landscape.
The near-identical tactics of both campaigns is proof enough: this state is divided, plain and simple. Romney and Obama are playing it safe, because everyone knows it’s up to the swing voters. The action (or inaction) of Colorado independents will ultimately decide whether Colorado turns red or blue on the electoral map come November 5th.
As sudden as Colorado’s rise in national presidential politics may seem, its path to realization has been a slower process than the media coverage otherwise suggests. Over the last four years, more and more Colorado voters are registering independent.
Yesterday, NBC News polled Romney and Obama as locked neck and neck in the fight to win Colorado. In a race as tight as this, Meghan Leuder’s reluctant participation is significant. Maybe she voted; perhaps she did not. Regardless, her uncertainty, shared by eligible voters across her home state, is something to pay attention to as the voting begins.






Leave Your Comment →
22 Comments
W. E. Messamore
10.26.2012
@W__E__Messamore
I love Meghan’s story because it’s easy to relate to. I know so many young voters who supported Mr. Obama in 2008, but, feeling disenchanted, aren’t sure who to support in 2012.
William Boardman
10.27.2012
@williamboardman
To be disenchanted with Obama is rational.
T think Romney would be better is madness.
Think, people — think!
Kate Morris
10.29.2012
@katemorris
It’s definitely a trend in the generation of young voters. Meghan is so emblematic of the larger issue for me, because she is so informed and principaled and yet was stuck at her own self-inflicted stalemate. It will be interesting to see how this transpires at the polls.
Alex Gauthier
10.26.2012
@alexg
the closeness of the race in Colorado is a testament to how effective Romney’s pivot has been since the primary.
Kate Morris
10.29.2012
@katemorris
Definitely truth there, Alex. I also think it is indicative of what we see with Meghan: a larger disenchantment at the American political system and the changing demographics that come with a nation in flux.
Roger Winkler
10.27.2012
yup
Angela Wolf Guthrie
10.27.2012
why does anyone think this whole thing is about ‘fairness’?
Kate Morris
10.29.2012
@katemorris
‘Fairness’ in what sense, Angela?
Rick London
10.27.2012
Of course.. Free country. Sheesh. Being Independent is nice, but not sure where you’re going with this; that maybe they should just get so much time in any particular state? That’s the way they did it in Stalin’s former Soviet Union. Let’s evolve with the questions; yours are usually very good.
Nathan Hill
10.27.2012
Gary Johnson should take from both equally in a state divided like the article describes.
Russell Anderson
10.27.2012
I don’t care how many people live in each state. I think each state should have 1 vote. The majority rules per state. Then you’ll see campaining spending equal time in each state.
William Boardman
10.27.2012
@williamboardman
Or the national winner is the one who gets the most votes.
Luke Enoch
10.27.2012
The electoral college is the worst system for voting.
Karen Lillis Bravo
10.27.2012
It’s reasonable that they spend that last couple weeks visiting states they are struggling in. I don’t see a problem with that. I’m kind of in the same spot as the girl in the article…. I’m not happy with either one of them. But, it’s my responsibility to do the research and educate myself as best I can in order to make the best decision possible. I am leaning toward Obama. While he has major experience in foreign policy, Mitt Romney has zero – and that scares me. I hate wars, my son served in Iraq and we need to end them and quit wasting money. I think Mitt has lied about too many things; he does not give us a clear position on his plans. I also don’t like the fact that he won’t show his tax returns (it bugs the hell out of me) – if he’s got nothing to hide then it should not be a problem – it’s just common sense. I don’t trust him. But all in all it’s a crappy choice to have to make – but I’ll do it. I just hope next time around more people will reject this two-party system and start helping to promote a different way of doing things.
Kate Morris
10.29.2012
@katemorris
Thanks for your thoughtful remarks, Karen. Your story brings an interesting perspective to this piece, and it is a unique perspective for parents of former troops. Continuing the dialogue and sharing our own experiences is what keeps our democratic system in motion.
Marilyn Mulloy
10.27.2012
Don`t fall for the old R & D, they are the same. Vote Gary Johnson for freedom.
Judy Ferro
10.27.2012
This only happens because of winner-take-all and the electorial college. It should be changed.
David Karr
10.27.2012
Who the F**K cares…. there should be no campaining, just television debates, take the money out of the whole process!
Alexander S. Bauer
10.27.2012
There is a major difference in being good on camera and being an effective leader with sound policies.
Kate Morris
10.29.2012
@katemorris
*applause*
Jerry Nighman
10.27.2012
Im more worried about the fairness of the established 2 corrupt political parties keeping a duopoly over the debate, seeing as 2 chairs of the debate commision are prominent Republican and Democrat.
Funny how the a rule to be included is 15% of 5 major national poles, when in most of those poles the other candidate isn’t included.
Im voting for Gary Johnson, someone who adresses serious problems with our country. Such as the NDAA, something the bipartisan douches all support.
Shawn M. Griffiths
10.27.2012
@shawntx
Colorado might be one of the more interesting states to watch and there will be plenty of interesting states to watch on election night.