Montana and Ben Cohen Stamp Money Out Of Politics
By Benjamin Foster | 10/15/2012 | Activism, Campaign Finance, Electoral Reform, Headline, Montana, Movements | 22 Comments
stampstampede.org
The state of Montana and Ben Cohen, of Ben and Jerry’s Ice Cream, are making their case for campaign finance reform. Montana is engaged in an ongoing legal battle to limit campaign donations in state and local elections. Cohen is simultaneously heading the “Stamp Stampede” campaign, aimed to “Stamp Money Out of Politics.” The project hopes to garner and then leverage public support for a constitutional amendment overturning Supreme Court Decisions Buckley v. Valeo (1976) and Citizen’s United (2011).
On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled on American Tradition Partnership v. Steve Bullock. The ruling rejected a Montana state law that a “corporation may not make… an expenditure in connection with a candidate or a political party.” The justices wrote:
“The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law. There can be no serious doubt that it does.”
Since that ruling, Montana continues to test the limits of Citizens United. The state enacted a law that imposes limits on campaign donations, but the move was challenged. The challenge reached US District Judge Charles Lovell, who ruled the law unconstitutional but provided little detail as to why:
“This court will in due course issue complete and extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law that support this order. They will be filed separately, though, so that this order can be issued before voting begins in the upcoming election.”
The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Judge Lovell’s ruling based on insufficient reasoning, in turn granting a temporary stay of campaign donation limits. Judge Lovell has since provided a 38-page explanation for the ruling. Montana remains vigilant but faces an uphill battle that can only be won with bipartisan support and grassroots campaigns like the one Ben Cohen is heading, “Stamp Stampede.”
There are virtually unlimited variations of stamps offered through the campaign’s website but Cohen’s personal stamp reads, “STAMP MONEY OUT OF POLITICS. AMEND THE CONSTITUTION.” The campaign hopes to attract supporters by empowering the individual. By using the Federal Reserves average lifespan of a bill (4.8 years), Stampstampede.org details the potential of one diligent supporter:
If YOU stamped for 1 year
1 bill per day would reach 300,000 in its lifespan
5 bills per day would reach 1.5 million in its lifespan
10 bills per day would reach 3 million in its lifespan
With strength in numbers, Cohen recognizes that the success of the campaign is contingent on the support of Democrats, Republicans, and independents alike. According to the Pew Research Center, bipartisanship should not be an issue:
“…65% of those who are aware of the new rules on independent expenditures say they are having a negative effect on the 2012 presidential campaign. And among those who have heard a lot about these new campaign finance rules, 78% say the effect has been negative.”
Cohen aims to use that negative sentiment as a catalyst for mobilization. With a strong democratic base of support, Cohen would be best served to focus on the fastest growing political party in the US, independents.





Leave Your Comment →
22 Comments
Chad Peace
10.15.2012
@Chad_Peace
Is that legal? Just curious. Ron Paul folks did this in 2008. I remember getting a few for change around town.
Lucas Eaves
10.15.2012
@lucaseaves
I was wondering the same. I know a famous frenchman got in trouble for burning a bill on TV as bills remains the property of State. However, it is amazing how many people you can reach with very limited tools and efforts.
Matt Metzner
10.15.2012
@mmetzner
That’s why that stamp looked so familiar. Always thought that writing on bills was defacing Federal Reserve property, but was rarely enforced. A little civil disobedience it seems.
Benjamin Foster
10.15.2012
@befoster87
Hello all,
I had the same questions. Turns out it is only illegal if you destroy the currency or deface it to the point where it is unusable. It is also illegal to put commericial advertisement on currency. Stampstampede.org provides some written correspondence from their lawyer confirming its legality.
Michael Higham
10.15.2012
@michaelhigham
Stamp your dollars bills to make a statement. Pretty cool idea, but I campaign finance reforms are extremely complicated. No matter what laws you try to pass, there will always be a way around it to get money into a political competition. If a reform measure goes too far, it’ll get struck down. If a reform measure goes as far as it can, someone will find a way to exploit it.
I could be wrong, but that’s what it seems like. It’s incredibly hard to regulate money flow without causing a riot.
Benjamin Foster
10.15.2012
@befoster87
I reluctantly agree, Michael. Constitutionally speaking, it is very difficult to silence the voice of corporations. The consenting Justices ruled that it is not within their constitutional authority to declare corporations as non-media. Therefore, they can’t limit the amount of money NY times spends no more than they can regulate the almighty SUPERPACS.
Blaz Gutierrez
10.15.2012
@blazgutierrez
Legal or not, there’s definitely tons of frustration over campaign funding. Not surprised that this is getting more and more attention.
Blake Bunch
10.15.2012
@blakebunch
A bit of civil disobedience indeed. Defacing federal property? Perhaps…. but almost every single bill is covered in some degree of filth. Definitely a decent way of getting the message out.
Terri Harel
10.15.2012
@tlharel
This is a great way to remind people about the absurd amount of money that goes into campaigns…
Jane Susskind
10.15.2012
@jsusskind
Pretty cool & cheap idea to get their message across a larger body of people. I agree with Michael, however, and the issue at hand if more complicated than seems on face. The stamp is a great start to fighting campaign finance by corporations, but just a start.
Michael Dishmon
10.15.2012
@bizurk
It would be pretty annoying if every business started stamping money with their own little website address. They shouldn’t be defacing money to get a message out. Spend some time on SEO like the rest of us.
Mike Foster
10.15.2012
@fosterca
I wish even a sliver of the money and time spent on reforming campaign finance was put towards enacting term limits. After you get term limits, the monster that is campaign finance reform, will be a little less intimidating, in my opinion.
Cassidy Noblejas Bartolomei
10.15.2012
@cassidynb
This battle between Montana and the Supreme Court rulings in Buckley v. Valeo and Citizen’s United is an interesting example of the relationship between the federal government and state governments. Both gov.s are so intertwined that I’m sure it will take a long time to see the outcome of Ben’s & Montana’s efforts…
Chad Peace
10.15.2012
@Chad_Peace
It really shouldn’t take a constitutional amendment. I suppose a simple “People shall be defined as having the general characteristics of a human being, namely, a mouth, arms, legs, a soul, and in most cases, a conscience” wouldn’t hurt.
Alex Gauthier
10.15.2012
@alexg
These money-stamping campaigns definitely create visibility for a cause, though I’m not sure how many have resulted in real action on the part of legislators.
Michael Dishmon
10.15.2012
@bizurk
Its cool its legal though.
Mark Bellamy
10.15.2012
Yes, the Supreme Court are bought and paid for. Their decisions are entirely political which defeats the purpose of their life time appointment. Our system of checks and balances is completely failing due to their inability to do their job. So if the legislature taking the reins to restore some of that balance is the only way, I say yes.
Ruthie Gale-Paredez
10.15.2012
That would be great but he has not said how…..There is a plan to be proposed to Congress but it seems to be 2op secret.
Roger Winkler
10.15.2012
no, I wouldn’t support it. What we need is less government power, not less address of grievance by public affected by that power.
Ernest Roldan
10.16.2012
Be an intelligent and an informed voter.
Know the person that you are voting for president.
See the movie 2016 before you cast you ballot this November.
It’s available on DVD starting tomorrow, October 16.
Benjamin Foster
10.15.2012
@befoster87
Thank you for taking the time to read the article, Ernest. I would prefer, however, that the comment thread be used to elevate the conversation that is specific to the article. I look forward to your contributions in the future.
Jamie Neeley Nagle
10.16.2012
Absolutely!!!