Economic Growth for the Next Four Years Optimistic on Jobs
By Trevor Hayes | 09/06/2012 | Economy, Headline, Issues, Legislation, President, Taxes | 35 Comments
Credit: sxc.hu
At the end of August the Congressional Budget Office added its voice to a growing list of economic analysts who are predicting an up turn in economic growth over the next four years. This prediction comes hot on the heels of a report issued by Moody’s Analytics earlier in August which made similarly optimistic observations on our four-year economic outlook. In addition, Macroeconomic Advisers delivered a similar report in April of this year.
So just how much economic growth can we expect over the course of the next four years? If you ask Moody’s Analytics or Macroeconomic Advisers, 12 million jobs will be added. This figure differs slightly from the number put out by the Congressional Budget Office in the end of August, in which they predicted that the economy will grow to add 9.4 million jobs by the end of 2016. The number is lower, but still incredibly significant given that the CBO is only allowed to make outlook predictions based on laws that are currently in effect or are planned to go into effect, making their numbers much less speculative.
What does this mean? It means that the CBO is predicting that the economy will grow a healthy amount over the next four years, even if Congress and the president let us go over the metaphorical “fiscal cliff” in January. The “fiscal cliff” is an aptly named event that is set to take place at the end of this year. The term describes an economic puzzle in which U.S. lawmakers must decide if they will let the planned tax increases, and spending cuts to social programs go into effect. The problem is twofold: if they choose to stop the planned spending cuts and tax increases from going into effect, they could potentially slow economic growth and further damage the economy. However, if they chose to cancel these spending cuts and tax increases they would add substantial amounts to the federal deficit, and risk pushing us deeper into a crisis that is increasingly similar to that of Greece and Europe.
According to the CBO, if the new budget measures are avoided and we continue on our current course, which they have outlined as an “Alternative Fiscal Scenario”, deficit added by the federal government would be significantly higher, in fact by 2022 the amount of debt held by the public would reach 90%- the highest it has been since the period immediately following World War 2. The trade-off would be greater economic growth in the short-term and the possibility of further reducing unemployment over the next four years. In all likelihood, what will happen as we approach the end of this year is a set of stop-gap measures until Washington can come to an agreement on where cuts should be made, as party leaders on both sides of the aisle willingly admit to the fact that they dislike the mandatory cuts.
Some specific changes that would take place at the start of the new year would be immediate reductions in all mandatory and discretionary spending, which includes defense spending. Elements of the Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, the Job Creation Act of 2010, and the Tax Relief act are set to expire, all of which extended reductions in tax rates and offered greater tax credits and deductions. The changes would also bring reductions in Medicare’s payment rates for physicians’, as well as ending extensions to emergency unemployment benefits and breaks in the payroll tax for social security.
So what can we take away from this abundance of data? Expect the continued slow growth through 2012 and into the start of 2013. Business owners will be taking a conservative stance approaching the end of the year until Congress reaches an agreement on the “fiscal cliff”, which will have wide-reaching implications for small businesses across the country. It is likely that despite whoever takes the White House in the coming election, they will be credited as the leader who brought about the economic recovery that Americans have been waiting for. And make no mistake, both camps are well aware of this fact, they understand the stakes, and some have preemptively started taking credit.




Leave Your Comment →
35 Comments
William Boardman
09.06.2012
@williamboardman
The prediction is that we’ll get 12 million new jobs over 4 years largely by doing — nothing.
In his acceptance speech, Mitt Romney promised to create 12 million new jobs over four years.
Therefore Mitt Romney promised to do nothing?
Trevor Hayes
09.06.2012
@thayes
I did a follow up report on just that fact.
William Boardman
09.06.2012
Too bad it didn’t make it in the original —
“Romney Promises to Achieve the Inevitable”
or some such. ;-)))
Trevor Hayes
09.06.2012
@thayes
I’m not sure that I’m allowed to be that scathing in my reports. Haha. Rest assured the follow up covers it sufficiently though. Something to the effect of “no merit in taking credit for the fiscal policies of the previous administration.”
William Boardman
09.06.2012
@williamboardman
No, scathing is bad, even when it’s true. ;-)))
Is your follow-up up yet?
Matt Metzner
09.06.2012
@mmetzner
Interesting insights, especially considering the rhetoric of the past week.
Brandon Fallon
09.06.2012
@bfallon
As long as jobs are created, the American people will be happy. The reason is is so slow now is the uncertainty factor that the partisan Congress and White House are arguing about, but not really discussing in earnest until after the election. The fiscal cliff and resulting uncertainty is what is preventing the economy from growing faster right now.
William Boardman
09.06.2012
Recent history suggests something more complicated about the American people, insofar as anyone can know the collective mind of 300 million people. There’s a disconnect between the unhappiness now, and unhappiness under Bush — especially given that Obama’s jobs record is demonstrably better than Bush’s (more jobs in four years than Bush scored in eight — suggests that maybe expectations influence happiness).
William Boardman
09.06.2012
As for Congress and the White House — isn’t it true that the White House has proposed jobs programs and Republicans have simply refused to act?
Brandon Fallon
09.06.2012
@bfallon
True. When the Senate Minority Leader says that it is more important to get rid of Obama than to focus on working together. If Obama had gotten his entire Jobs Bill passed with investment in green energy, infrastructure, and trade deals, things might have been different.
William Boardman
09.06.2012
Yes! And why doesn’t everyone get that?
Drew Martin
09.06.2012
nope
Lucretia Lulu Talley
09.06.2012
#Sadtruth is if it’s President Obama no if It’s Romney yes
Karen Weil
09.06.2012
Yes,
Will Phillipson
09.06.2012
you can’t recover from an impending disaster,
Sandra Pipkin Dickson
09.06.2012
I can hope!
Hal Dunn
09.06.2012
Probably. If it’s not Obama, it’s more likely.
Kim Renae Raeder- Erbacher
09.06.2012
always optimistic, My confidence comes from being surrounded by hardworking, innovative,smart, brave Americans. I have confidence we will get through this as American’s not because of who’s in office.
Kathy Jones
09.06.2012
Then they should not be looking at a QE 3 then as they were just last week projecting a 70 percent chance of another recession.
Trevor Hayes
09.06.2012
@thayes
Recessions can be short, which is why the predictions for growth over the next year are remaining slow, but then pick up starting in 2014.
Greg Curry
09.06.2012
that is Mitch’s agenda !
Angela Smith
09.06.2012
I’ll be optimistic when I can finally find a full-time JOB!
Melissa Scott
09.06.2012
Yes. Absolutely.
Christine K. McCloud
09.06.2012
Well, whoever gets it done, then good for all of us!
Clinton Chrisman
09.06.2012
NOT IF OBUMMERS in there. We will sink faster and harder than the TITANIC did..
Trevor Hayes
09.06.2012
@thayes
I’m kind of guessing you didn’t read the article. The point is that the growth will happen regardless of who is President.
Richard de Freitas
09.06.2012
So if 911, two wars, unregulated banks and big business, and deficit spending during the eight years preceding Obama lead to this economic mess and the cost of the recovery, then does that mean, since Bush got blamed for the depression, should Obama get blamed for the recovery, even if Romney occupies the White House?
Trevor Hayes
09.06.2012
@thayes
Essentially? Yes. I just wrote a follow up article about how Romney has taken these numbers and claimed he can create 12 million jobs in his first term. The jobs will happen regardless of who is in the white house, so it’s fair to assume that it is due to the fiscal policies (in part) of President Obama.
Eddie Denise
09.06.2012
Gotta laugh. Teapubs pledged to make sure Obama fails….then accuse him of…..FAILING!
Nona Eggerman- Windus
09.07.2012
Nope
Nona Eggerman- Windus
09.07.2012
Not with Obama or Romney
Trevor Hayes
09.06.2012
@thayes
With either one according to the CBO.
La'Dene Bean
09.07.2012
No – If elected Romney will destroy us, I expect severe civil unrest and violence and ruination of the former USA. We will all be reading the Koran and covering up our women ~
JC Nighswander
09.07.2012
I wish I could trade my citizenship.
Dan Richards
09.08.2012
@danrich
This is what Thomas Sewell said four years ago, and the Liberal Democrats and Republicans ignored him and went to the stimulus bill and forced it through. Thomas Sewell is a Black Economics Professor, that did not have any liberal help making his name well known, he did it the old fashion way, he worked for it on his own. He laid out a very good plan in a few of his Articles that showed how we could recover a lot better during this four year period, and it was very sound, even though we would have hurt for a few years, we would be seeing the increase starting now.