GOP Excludes Ron Paul From Speaking in Tampa
By Peter Barbour | 08/17/2012 | Elections 2012, Featured, Movements, President | 47 Comments
Photo: ABC News
The son is in and the father out. Senator Rand Paul (KY) is scheduled to speak at the Republican National Convention later this month in Tampa while the senator’s father and Republican presidential candidate, Dr. Ron Paul (TX), has not been scheduled to speak, disappointing his many supporters.
Getting shut out of this year’s convention, just as the Texas congressman was shut out of last cycle’s convention, is likely a “punishment” for not endorsing the party’s presumptive nominee. The purpose of all national conventions, whether Democratic or Republican, is to present a united party and provide positive momentum for all candidates, especially the party’s top ticket of president and vice president. Rand Paul endorsed Governor Romney and he will be speaking; Ron Paul has not and most likely will not endorse Romney– and he will not be speaking.
Senator Paul differs from Romney on issues of importance to millions of Americans who consider liberty the most important ingredient of good public policy, issues like warrantless wiretapping, indefinite detention of American citizens, and executive overreach (e.g. the NDAA, the Patriot Act), but his endorsement of Romney is why he is speaking.
However, if the GOP were to allow someone to speak who fails to endorse the party’s nominee while taking an independent position from the party on several issues, in this case Rep. Ron Paul, that could publicly embarrass the party before millions of viewers and fracture the party even more than it is now.
And make no mistake, there is a fracture. Most GOP voters will vote for Governor Romney and his running mate, Wisconsin congressman Paul Ryan in November, but Paul’s showing in the GOP primary this year reveals that there are millions of liberty-minded voters who will likely not vote for Romney / Ryan because of the ticket’s unwillingness so far to support any of the issues that matter to these liberty voters. In a close election with several swing states in contention, those votes could be decisive and lead to a second term for President Obama.
But leaving the elder Paul out of the convention may not help the party present a unified front to the country, nor hide the fracture growing within. Though the RNC has not allowed Ron Paul to speak at the convention, they can’t keep him from talking to the media during the convention, nor muzzle his supporters on the convention floor. No one expects that the Romney / Ryan ticket and GOP will adopt the entire Ron Paul agenda as their own, but if their goal is party unity and strength, they should look for opportunities to extend an olive branch to Ron Paul supporters when they can.
For instance, Rep. Paul sponsored HR 459 (The Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2012) and it was passed overwhelmingly in the House by a vote of 327-98. The significance of this vote is that 89 Democrats joined 238 Republicans in support of Ron Paul’s bill. That is bipartisan support. If Romney and the GOP were smart, they would publicly announce strong support for Dr. Paul’s bill and urge the Senate to pass it and President Obama to sign it. Supporting HR 459 would not get all of Ron Paul’s supporters, but it could get enough of them to make the difference between winning and losing in November.




Leave Your Comment →
47 Comments
Charlie Peters
08.17.2012
Bill Clinton, Al Gore & Senator Obama supported the California 2006 Prop. 87, a GMO corn ethanol welfare program.
Bill, Al, have changed opinion on the ethanol mandate, I wonder if California will make this the time for CHANGE?
I support a waiver of the ethanol mandate, voluntary use of ethanol in my gas.
Federal ethanol policy increases Government motors oil use and Big oil profit.
It is reported that today California is using Brazil sugar cane ethanol at $0.16 per gal increase over using GMO corn fuel ethanol. In this game the cars and trucks get to pay and Big oil profits are the result that may be ready for change.
We do NOT support AB 523 or SB 1396 unless the ethanol mandate is changed to voluntary ethanol in our gas.
Folks that pay more at the pump for less from Cars, trucks, food, water & air need better, it is time.
The car tax of AB 118 Nunez is just a simple Big oil welfare program, AAA questioned the policy and some folks still agree.
AB 523 & SB 1326 are just a short put (waiver) from better results.
GOOGLE: Prop 87 (510) 537-1796
Charlie Peters
08.17.2012
Audit the fed, support HR 459 Paul
jeffhalldorson
08.17.2012
@jeffhalldorson
What is the GOP so afraid of with Ron Paul? Peace…….Liberty…….Balanced Budgets……..Rational Foreign Policy……..Enthusiastic Young supporters…….The Constitution and Bill of Rights?
Go Ron Paul and the Liberty Movement!
nader paul kucinich gravel mckinney baldwin ventura sheehan perot carter
08.17.2012
No more Puppet Presidents controlled by criminals.
we all know what the controlled media is paid to do
Michael Higham
08.17.2012
@michaelhigham
I guess I understand why the GOP would want to keep Ron Paul from ruining their “party”. HAHAHAHAHA. I feel like if Ron Paul spoke at the convention it would create an awkward tension since not all of his views are endorsed by “conservatives”. I’d LOVE to see Ron Paul speak and blast so called conservatives, though. Last cycle’s TV debates, we saw the other Republicans not taking him seriously, despite support from the crowd. His Federal Reserve Transparency bill is probably one of the few things they might actually agree on.
Shawn M. Griffiths
08.17.2012
@shawntx
The RNC has been really strict about maintaining that image of unity this year, more so than past years even. I know bloggers who can’t get credentials, even though they’re somewhat popular bloggers, that can’t get in because their message isn’t party-first.
KC Ted
08.17.2012
“Getting shut out of this year’s convention, just as the Texas congressman was shut out of last cycle’s convention, is likely a “punishment” for not endorsing the party’s presumptive nominee.”
Except for one small matter, Dr Paul hasn’t dropped out. Why would an opposing candidate endorse his opponent? Will Romney have to endorse Obama?
“The purpose of all national conventions, whether Democratic or Republican, is to present a united party and provide positive momentum for all candidates”
No, I beg to differ, The purpose of a convention is to select the candidate. If the candidate is already pre-chosen, why have a convention? Many conventions have been real battlegrounds before a final candidate selection. That’s why they have them. In this case the RNC has done the choosing right from the start, using “any means necessary”.
Peter Barbour
08.17.2012
@peterbarbour
Ted, RP has no ego. He cares about ideas, not speaking. Whether he speaks or not, the GOP will lose again for sure if it does not genuinely adopt at least parts of the Ron Paul agenda.
Leslie Short
08.17.2012
Peter, you’re partially right that RP cares more about the ideas, no matter who speaks about them. But, even if the GOP accepts some of the ideas, very few, if any, RP supporters will vote for Romney. We have seen that Romney can talk the talk; but how can we trust him to walk the walk? At best, it would be a verbal agreement that would be disavowed if first day in office, if elected. I don’t trust Romney any farther than I can pee … and with an enlarged prostate, that isn’t very far.
Jeff Phillips
08.17.2012
@Jeff Phillips
Excuse me? The “PURPOSE” of a national convention is to have a venue by which we may send delegates to vote for in ACTUALLY DECIDING who to nominate. You have made a fundamentally flawed and false statement to claim that the “purpose” of the convention is to praise a previously assumed “presumptive” nominee and give him all glory. That is completely bull crap! In fact, if it is true then it can only mean that the democratic process has become corrupted and it is time that we the people disband this tyrannical RNC & form a new method of nominating who we want to be on the ballot for the presidential race–after all, the sake of the liberty of our future generations is at stake.
If the Republican National Committee really wanted to already have an official candidate nominated that they could then arrange venues to praise and promote, then the RNC should have scheduled its national convention to be held earlier in the year so that it could have completed the democratic process fairly and would be justified moving forward. To state that the entire purpose of the convention is to do the opposite of what the convention was even created for–to praise a previously assumed winner, rather than to engage the process of selecting the winner, is just outrageous levels of bs extreme!
Bristol Bailey
08.17.2012
probably…Ron Paul is the man, he should be the next president !! And it speaks to his integrity that he wont endorse someone like Romney who is a total joke…he wont compromise and thats why we love him !!!
Stormie Forte
08.17.2012
Well I hope his supporters think about that on 11/6
Joseph Hagerty
08.17.2012
He will still get my VOTE !!!! ( Ron Paul)
Justin Renquist
08.17.2012
oh yeah Joseph, yay for the Ku KluxKlan racist and homophobe (not). Get REAL.
Don Gotti
08.17.2012
Justin, you’re so misinformed. Go back and finish sucking Barry off.
bob jackson
08.18.2012
@bobj72
“
bob jackson
08.18.2012
@bobj72
“don gotti”; YOU may want to consider going-out and “renting” some Maturity, Refinement and and Civility. …….
bob jackson
08.18.2012
@bobj72
“don gotti”; YOU may want to consider going-out and “renting” some Civility, Maturity and Decency. …….
Independent Voter
08.17.2012
Justin Renquist Please engage in a dialogue, not name calling.
Joe Lyons Vigliatura
08.17.2012
The GOP is about as screwed up as the Democrats Party
Joseph Hagerty
08.17.2012
Just for Justin…….[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiKh9Ko3mw4&w=420&h=315
Beverly Farmer Price
08.17.2012
No more so than they have for the last few conventions. The GOP hates libertarians but they love it when they (or any other independent voter) votes Republican.
Bernie Valentine
08.17.2012
Well, of course!! You wouldn’t think that the RNC is suddenly concerned with an open dialogue of issues and freedom of expression from all segments of voters, would you!??
Michael Snider
08.17.2012
Guess what? Until Ron Paul says we need to vote for Romney I am voting Ron Paul
John McKanna
08.17.2012
Irrelevent. Truth hurts.
Michael Sullivan
08.17.2012
We need to get rid of the do nothing, concede, or compomise, racist, Republican, Plutocracy, for rich greedy upper class blood suckers !!! The Republicans have sold our “DEMOCRACY” !!!
Ann Atwood Fraley
08.17.2012
No, they aren’t punishing him. They’re afraid of his delegates.
Paul Tan
08.17.2012
Matters not to me. I’d rather not hear the loon speak.
Terry Sandars
08.19.2012
You are dumber than a mud fence post.
John Dube'
08.17.2012
@Michael, you speak the truth! It is criminal what the GOP is conducting and they will be sorry come election day!
George Bennett
08.17.2012
GOP ‘Grand Old Pricks’ & they are living up to it! :-(
William Harris
08.17.2012
Ron Paul doesn’t believe Iran is a threat? There is one reason!
Terry Sandars
08.19.2012
Who give a flip about Iran. Anyone who thinks that Iran is all about a Nuke my want to wake up and smell the Roses. It has nothing to do with the Nuke. It has all the world to do with Iran taking gold from China for thier oil. Remember the Petrodollar? I spent 13 months in Vietnam. When I got into country I got this big pep talk. “Men we have to stop Communism right here and now and if we do not it will spread through out the Far East”. What a crock I was fed. We left with our tails between our legs and had over 55,000 killed and how far has Communish spread in the Far East? In case you do not know it has not spread one inch. These conflicts are a crock and Ron Paul is 200 percent correct on his stand against these foreign conflicts. You people who are buying into the warmongering are completely out of touch and you are sucking up the crap. You are nothing more than sheep led to the slaughter.
Douglas Neslund
08.17.2012
I thought he did …
Bristol Bailey
08.17.2012
@ William…he does think they are a threat, but because of the things we do to other countries, he wants us to mind our own business…sounds great to me :)
Kevin Whitbeck
08.17.2012
No they aren’t he is a crackpot and he had his shot
Terry Sandars
08.19.2012
Tell you what sport try this on and see how the shoe fits. Let’s say tomorow some troop from Iran comes and kicks in your door. Throws your s*** all over the place. Are you going to get pissed? Lets say he pops one of those dromes on you and kills your three year old daughter. Are you going to be pissed. You might right you will be pissed and rightfully so. It is just find when we do this but put the shoe on the other foot and everything changes real fast. You people are blind. You only see it one way.
John Vasilakis
08.17.2012
Kevin, how exactly is he a crackpot? Because he believes in a sound monetary policy? Because he believes in personal liberty? Because he believes in a sane foreign policy? Because he is one of the only candidates honest enough to tell the truth about this countries dire financial predicament? Yeah, sure sounds like a crackpot to me (rolls eyes). Some of you sheep are unbelievable.
Terry Sandars
08.19.2012
Man you can’t tell these flipping idiots anything. Why do you think we are in such a mess? It is because we got all of these idiots walking around who could not find their a** with both hands and a sealed beam flashlight. They don’t know s*** from straight up.
Walt Oliver
08.17.2012
The bulk of votes for any ‘independent candidate’ splits the ticket. The question becomes, which one?
Gary McCorvey
08.17.2012
I don’t give a DAMN who speaks at either convention. I am writing in Ron Paul. You should do the same.
David Davidson
08.17.2012
They do this at their own peril! Say what you want or will about Congressman Paul and even Senator Paul, but they have done and continue to be above board on all things, Mr. Romney on the other hand is and has proven anything but! So the question remains then, who is the cheat and the cheated? Answer: WE THE PEOPLE. But when last I looked, and believe you me when I tell you I did look last their are more of US than their are of them, and all the money in the world won’t and can’t buy or compete with that. If we were smart we would teach these people a valuable lesson, and its an aged old lesson, keep your friends close but your enemies closer. Mr. Romney regards US as the enemy and he has failed to keep US close. In that regard then he goes into Tampa–St. Petersburg without his enemies and very, very little friends. He needs and should be reminded of this FACT, and during the run up and at the GOP Convention he needs to be showed. We need to find someone other than Romney and most certainly someone other than Obama to get behind and back to the hilt, period, and at the same time extend one BIG and UNITED MIDDLE FINGER to the Establishment: You mess with one of US, you mess with ALL OF US…They need US far, far more than WE need them, they know, WE NEED TO SHOW IT, and have done with these self righteous weak kneed rum runners once and for all…What say you INDEPENDENTS?????
Peter Barbour
08.17.2012
@peterbarbour
Hi David. It seems to me that whenever a political party has an opportunity to expand their base of support, it would make sense for them to want to do so. In this case, the GOP has an opportunity to expand its support by making a genuine commitment to those parts of the Ron Paul agenda they can support. For a party that claims to be pro liberty, you cannot make that claim in my opinion and support liberty eroding laws like NDAA and the Patriot Act. You cannot make the claim of being pro limited government and simultaneously support a graduated income tax and unlimited government power to tax and spend. This is an oxymoron, a contradiction that is not lost on liberty minded voters. For instance, the GOP would not lose support by backing Dr. Paul on Audit the Fed, repealing NDAA detention clause and Patriot Act; they would gain the support of millions of liberty-oriented voters who at this time will either vote for Dr. Paul or Gary Johnson. A genuine commitment to some of Dr. Paul’s ideas would be good policy and good politics, a win-win situation. Failure to make this commitment and the party likely assures President Obama a 2nd term. You’re right, David, the GOP hurts itself politically if it does not genuinely reach out to the liberty-oriented voter. Take care.
Steven Ritter
08.17.2012
Paul and his followers are dillusional thinkers…please vote for Paul:)
chuck
08.17.2012
In 1 of the debates Paul said more in 89sec. then all the rest, can you imagine how many would wake up in 15mins with MSM? Id say that’s what they might be afraid of. Imo.
Terry Sandars
08.19.2012
Oh let me count the ways that the Republican Party is screwing up. This is not 2008 and this one is going to bite them in the butt. Voter fraud, throwing out fairly elected Delegates/Alternates, issuing gag orders. The Republican Party has made Obama look week when it comes to stepping all over our Constitution. What ever happend to the First Amendment. Oh you can be seated at the RNC if you sign a pledge to keep your mouth shut and back Romney. If the good lord lets me live a few more years I will spend that time bashing the Republican Party. I pray that Romney gets beat and I can not stand what Obama stands for.
Terry Sandars
08.21.2012
Pay attention Republican GOP. As a Delegate to the RNC I will be in Tampa. You have screwed Ron Paul. I am a Vietnam Vet and will be in full garb. I will pitch on big fit down there and I will do everything I can to get news media around me and stick a microphone in my face. At that time I will let the world know just what a pack of crooks you are. Think not then show your a** up and see what I do.