Bill Bloomfield Aims for Upset Over Partisan Incumbent Henry Waxman
By Kymberly Bays | 08/17/2012 | California, Congressional, Elections 2012, Headline | 11 Comments
Credit: bloomfieldforcongress.com
A wave of anti-incumbency has rocked recent Republican primary elections across the country, but they aren’t the only signs of a possible shake-up on Capitol Hill. In California, the state’s first-ever open primary has put a once safely-Democratic Los Angeles congressional seat in play, setting up an outcome which could send reverberations through the American political landscape.
Independent challenger Bill Bloomfield wants to unseat 37-year veteran Congressman Henry Waxman in California’s 33rd Congressional District. In June, Bloomfield advanced to the general election in a crowded field of 4 Democrats, a Republican, a Libertarian and a Green party candidate. He won 24.6% of the primary vote. Incumbent Rep. Waxman pulled in just 45.3%.
Bloomfield credits new redistricting and open primaries as the “one prescription working”, resulting in an unprecedented opportunity to move Congress forward towards a nonpartisan and functional future.
“At least in California, where we have independent redistricting and open primaries, we can hold you accountable,” said Bloomfield. “We don’t care what you say, we don’t care about your politicking, if you don’t get the job done, we the voters will not send you back.”
Bloomfield said Rep. Waxman has changed since first being elected into Congress in 1975, and says in the past four years he has rarely voted out of line with Democratic initiatives.
“It’s not about how liberal [Waxman] is or isn’t, I’m running because of how partisan he is,” said Bloomfield.
Gallup’s congressional approval rating once again puts public opinion of Congress at 10%, an all-time low. Critics have called the 112th Congress “the worst Congress ever” due to their inability to pass legislation.
Bloomfield viewed 2012 as the perfect time to utilize redistricting reform and California’s open primary. By winning, he wants to encourage other states to make the same reforms.
“For some people voting in this district, for the House seat, it is the first time their vote will matter. This is first time the district isn’t gerrymandered,” said Bloomfield.
“The truth is we’re writing the book on running as an independent,” he continued.
Also on Bloomfield’s radar is fellow independent and a candidate for Senate in Maine, Angus King. The former two-term governor is currently running as an independent to replace Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe’s vacant seat. Both men have strong support and a realistic shot of winning, despite lack of party support. They met face-to-face for the first time three weeks ago in Washington, D.C. at a No Labels event.
King has declined to state who he would caucus with if he is sent to Capitol Hill. It’s a principled decision Bloomfield himself supports.
“I respect him a lot,” said Bloomfield. “Both of us are refusing to say who we will caucus with and that’s because both of us don’t want to caucus with anyone.”
“One should be able to run as an independent, win, and not have to choose a side between the Republicans or the Democrats, and be able to get committee assignments,” he continued.
In fact, Bloomfield has his own strategy when it comes to making a difference through committee assignments in Congress. As one of the only viable candidates to refuse PAC money, he says he could be a valuable resource on several congressional committees.
“When I get back [to Washington], I want to get [Minority Leader Nancy] Pelosi and [House Speaker John] Boehner in a room together and tell them to put me on a committee,” said Bloomfield. “Not to simply push the only independent to the side, but find committees that need a nonpartisan, one who doesn’t owe anything to special interests.”
He is confident in such an approach because the political will is there. No Labels has been spearheading initiatives designed to fix partisan gridlock by recruiting lawmakers open to compromise. A mandate to send Bloomfield to the Hill would find him an active proponent of such efforts like the Fix Congress Now Caucus, he says. Bloomfield is one of the co-founders of No Labels and said the group has recruited eight senators and nearly 40 House members who are “bipartisan but pragmatic”.
Of this growing coalition of lawmakers already in Congress, Bloomfield said, “they get it.”
Up until now, the pure numbers game of Congress have led many to question the practical difference one independent House member could achieve. With the new caucus focused on making Congress work, and not on partisan agenda or winning elections, the power to sway legislation could move away from the ideological control of political parties.
“Now, I’m not one of 435, I’m one of 40–and out of that 40, I’m the only true, pure nonpartisan,” Bloomfield said.
To Bloomfield, a large part of his campaign is to set a precedent. An independent win against a long time incumbent would garner huge press attention, and Bloomfield hopes, the imagination of independently-minded people in other states.
“First and foremost it sends a powerful message. It’s one thing for a Tea Party-backed candidate to win,” said Bloomfield. “But for the public to take out someone because he’s too partisan–that’s a whole other story.”




Leave Your Comment →
11 Comments
Michael Higham
08.17.2012
@michaelhigham
It’s great to see open primaries and top-two system in the works. I think it’s a matter of time before we see a legislature full of Independents. My concern is the efficiency of a legislature with many Independents and differing views on policy. One view is that they will slowly move towards partisan-like lines on policy, another view is that the diversity of views will cause a lack of consensus. BUT what could be worse then the lack of consensus with a hyper-partisan legislature that lacks the ability to compromise? Independents need to be given a chance. I believe the Independent-minded will come to much better compromise and will feel much more accountability since there’s no big party to fall back on.
Tom Tanton
08.18.2012
I’m not sure if Waxman is politically threatened because he’s too partisan (which he is) or because his policy approaches are just so wrong (which they are). Not sure those are mutually exclusive, nor perfect matches, but a Waxman loss shouldn’t be read too much as a surge in ‘independents.’
Stefanie Mastro
08.18.2012
A good message
Dan Zeller
08.18.2012
For partisan candidates to quit screwing their constituents and stop using government for their own financial gain. SELFISH GREDDY ASSHOLES…
John Prewitt
08.18.2012
We are sick and tired of the incumbent riff raff and graft!
La'Dene Bean
08.18.2012
It signals keep up this partisan nonsense, we will fire you too! Do not forget for whom you work. Not themachine, but WE THE PEOPLE /
Ken McEntee
08.18.2012
Do Bloomfield’s nostrils aim downward, like those of a normal person, or straight outward, like Waxman’s?
Lance Willis
08.18.2012
Good bye Henry…..you sleez bag!!!!!
Karen Marie
08.19.2012
Hopefully it is the start of something good.
Austin Battenberg
08.19.2012
He’s just a Republican running as an Independent. If people in that district were smart, they would have supported Christopher David.
Bev Morse
09.10.2012
@Bev Morse
i know bill. he’s a good guy and former neighbor, altho he led the undergrounding utilities drive in our neigbhorhood, much to the dismay of many who had many other pressing and personal needs and uses for $60,000 – cash upfront – or about double that figure for paying ‘over time’. the problem with bill’s ‘independent’ stand, is that he has contributed ONLY to republican issues and candidacies for as long as i’ve known him. hundreds of thousands of dollars, actually – to mcain (for whom he worked, pacs, and more. it really doesn’t ring ‘independent’ – they ‘owe’ him. running as an independent in the primary, he ran a decent campaign, but it’s important to note that the only candidate running as a republican in the same district, was not supported by the gop. ergo: they’re betting on bill. as i said: a nice guy and neighbor – if a bit of ‘romney’ out of touch – but his ‘conversion’ from gop to independent in one year, after working for the party and mccain – doesn’t ring of no ties, no pressure, nor wash/dc hill buddies…