CBO: Post Ruling, Health Care Reform Still Reduces Deficit
By Kymberly Bays | 07/26/2012 | Headline, Health Care, Issues | 22 Comments
President Obama signs the Affordable Care Act in 2009. Credit: reid.senate.gov
The Affordable Care Act, as upheld by a June Supreme Court decision, will cost $84 billion less than expected due to Medicaid opt-outs, according to the Congressional Budget Office. A recent analysis by the non-partisan CBO found the health care reform law will reduce the national deficit in light of decreased costs.
On the same hand, 3 million fewer people will gain coverage under the Medicaid expansion due to various states opting out of the program.
“For the average person who does not enroll in Medicaid as a result of the Court’s decision and becomes uninsured, federal spending will decline by roughly an estimated $6,000 in 2022,” says the CBO report.
This analysis is in review of previous CBO estimates made earlier this year. The reduction in costs totals $84 billion over an 11-year period from 2012 to 2022.
“That reduction occurs mostly because federal spending during that period for Medicaid and CHIP is now projected to be $289 billion less than previously expected, whereas the estimated costs of tax credits and other subsidies for the purchase of health insurance through the exchanges (and related spending) have risen by $210 billion.”
Given the revised calculations, the CBO maintains the Affordable Care Act would “on net, reduce deficits.” The office found no revision of this estimate necessary following the Supreme Court decision, even with Medicaid opt-outs. CBO analysis has always estimated the health care law would reduce federal deficits.
A repeal of the health care law, on the other hand, was found to increase federal budget deficits by $109 billion from 2013 to 2022.
This finding is undoubtedly a blow to Republican arguments for repealing the Affordable Care Act on the ground that it will negatively effect what is viewed as out-of-control federal deficit spending.
Despite an increase in savings and a positive effect on the national deficit, states forgoing Medicaid expansion will miss out on cutting down mortality levels of low-income Americans.
The New England Journal of Medicine published a study yesterday linking Medicaid expansion to significantly fewer deaths.
“State Medicaid expansions to cover low-income adults were significantly associated with reduced mortality as well as improved coverage, access to care, and self-reported health,” says the report.
Medicaid expansion estimates put deaths on a decline by 6.1%, according to the researchers.
These benefits would be lost in states who choose to decline health care reform’s Medicaid expansion provisions.





Leave Your Comment →
22 Comments
Matt Metzner
07.26.2012
@mmetzner
Obamacare gives us health coverage and reduces the deficit. You’re play Republicans.
Bob Jackson
07.26.2012
“Matt”; I don’t know that the “Fright-Edge-WingNUT’s” are capable of PLAYING ….. they’ve been LYING for so long, I don’t think they have a counter-strategy to The Truth. America has reached the “Lowest Depths Ever” when we come to a point of accepting “Known Lies” from our Politicians. ……..
Michael Higham
07.26.2012
@michaelhigham
I hear so much about the costs of the Affordable Care Act that I don’t even know what to believe anymore. Ever since Obama began working on the law, we’ve heard both sides say the exact opposite of each other the whole way through. I’d like to see the analysis the CBO did, but if it saves money, THEN LET’S GO!
Craig D. Schlesinger
07.27.2012
@craigschlesinger
My only suggestion is to not entirely trust the CBO on anything, ACA or otherwise. After all, no matter how “independent” it claims to be, its still the CONGRESSIONAL Budget Office – and both parties love to increase the defictits and debts.
Peter Barbour
07.26.2012
@peterbarbour
Folks, the best way to reduce our debt would be to limit govt power to tax and spend. At a minimum we should freeze current spending (or keep at/below rate of inflation) and not add new programs, something our govt is incapable of doing, whether GOP or Dems are in charge. But I acknowledge that mine is a minority viewpoint; most people want big govt and are not concerned about the debt. Take care.
Tim Kieser
07.26.2012
How does it reduce the deficit? This is bs, it adds to it.
Marty Keller
07.26.2012
It should help me sell that bridge I own in Brooklyn.
Che Harness
07.26.2012
No, I never objected to it for monetary reasons.
But I’ve become even more against it after watching my mother deal with the medical industry for the past 10 months. There’s no way I will pay into a system of incompetent pill-pushers.
Miriam S Alqaisi
07.26.2012
This doesn’t work. Until its the government who is paying doctors. This doesn’t work. No one wants to go through the entire process and devote their lives to medicine in this country, if they get no payback. When you discount, that money has to come from somewhere. Until government accepts FULL not partial, or less responsibility, that money comes from doctor pockets. And they’re not as rich as you think.
Bob Jackson
07.26.2012
“Miriam”; What Does the “Health Insurance Cartel” (“HIC”) do? 1.) The HIC takes a MAJOR PORTION of the revenue out of the H/C system, depriving Doctors and other Service Providers from those revenues. 2.) The HIC Executives, are among the Highest Paid Executives in industry, DESPITE the fact they offer absolutely “NO Added Value” to the H/C process. 3.) The HIC ‘Not Only’ Dictates the Services & Procedures the Doctors and Service Providers will perform, AND they clearly intercede (“come”) between the Doctors and their Patients.
To really understand why the present Health Care system is “Unsustainable”; with No Health Care Reform, in Eight (8) years – in the Year 2018 a family of 4 would be Charged $24,000 Per Year for their Health Care Insurance Premiums. You may find knowledge of the following helpful.
The causes of Health Care being “Unsustainable” going forward is Republicans are in “lock-step” related to the following; Their Philosophy, Value System, Financial considerations and their relationship to the HEALTH CARE INSURANCE INDUSTRY WHOSE CONTROL AFFECTS EACH & EVERY ASPECT OF THE AMERICAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. This includes; Doctors, Physician Assistants, Nurses, Hospitals, Clinics, Nursing Homes, Rehab Centers, Labs, Pharmaceutical / Drug Industry, Medical Equipment and Medical Supplies. From R&D to Advertisement, Marketing, Wholesale and Retail sales to the consumer. (……. Picture “an animal eating its’ own.”)
The following are Statistics from the 2008 Annual Rankings of Fortune 500. The Supporting information follows; Seven (7) of the Top fifty (50) Fortune 500 companies in America are either Health Care Insurance Companies or they are entities in the Health Care industry. While it’s suggested that the Health Care “Parasites” ONLY earn 2% – 4% Profit annually. The Truth is “Quite Different”. Here are some “Thumbnail Averages” of the top 8 Health Care company averages, compared to the “Same Average Size” Fortune 500 Company. For comparison, below is the Actual Profit, as a percentage of Revenue, which is comprised of Revenue (earned), Assets (retained) and Share Holder Equity (to be paid to investor’s.) NOTE; The figures below DO NOT include Co-Pays, Deductibles and Non-Covered Services, some of which are Rebated back to the HIC’s from the Doctors and Service Providers.
H/C Co. Rev. $26 BILLION Annually Comparative Co. Rev. $26 BILLION Annually
H/C Profit 5.3% plus 155.9% Comparative Co. 3.4%
H/C Assets 7.0% plus 218.8% Comparative Co. 3.2%
H/C Inv. Equity 19.5% plus 216.7% Comparative Co. 9.0%
H/C Tot. Profit 31.8% plus 203.9% Comparative Co. 15.6%
Hope you find this information helpful. The CBO has yet to “Cost Out” the 123 AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO DIE EACH DAY – FROM HAVING NO HEALTH CARE INSURANCE.
This data was personally compiled using Fortune 500 data as the source.
Allan Carroll
07.27.2012
no
Aidan King
07.27.2012
Very tricky language in this headline. I’ll read later though
Rich Hudson
07.27.2012
If there was a means test on SSI and Medicaid right now, we could save a bundle.
Robert Tovar
07.27.2012
Who is COOKING these Statistics???
Patti Angélique
07.27.2012
Mark Shank
07.27.2012
Get rid of it!!!”DEMOCRAT TAXES”!!!
Rich Blinne
07.27.2012
Aidan the “extra” savings are caused by having 3 million people like Samuel not being covered since the governors won’t accept benefits 100% paid for by Feds. They will probably change their tune when the hospitals come screaming at them having to cover unpaid ER visits that would have been paid for. Same for the people who see their rates go up.. A separate CBO analysis shows repealing ACA increases deficit 109 billion dollars.
Aidan King
07.27.2012
Rich I have my mind made up. Please dont talk to me about this anymore.
Mary Hackett
07.27.2012
No.
Rich Blinne
07.27.2012
The story buried the lead. It’s obvious that if you cover fewer people it costs less. Also in the story is a study in the New England Journal of Medicine that shows that expanding Medicaid as envisioned in the ACA cuts deaths by over 6%.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1202099
Rich Blinne
07.27.2012
Here’s the results of the study.
Medicaid expansions were associated with a significant reduction in adjusted all-cause mortality (by 19.6 deaths per 100,000 adults, for a relative reduction of 6.1%; P=0.001). Mortality reductions were greatest among older adults, nonwhites, and residents of poorer counties. Expansions increased Medicaid coverage (by 2.2 percentage points, for a relative increase of 24.7%; P=0.01), decreased rates of uninsurance (by 3.2 percentage points, for a relative reduction of 14.7%; P<0.001), decreased rates of delayed care because of costs (by 2.9 percentage points, for a relative reduction of 21.3%; P=0.002), and increased rates of self-reported health status of “excellent” or “very good” (by 2.2 percentage points, for a relative increase of 3.4%; P=0.04).
Bob Jackson
07.27.2012
“Rich”; Excellent research and documentation. Too bad the “Tree Stumps” don’t have the intellectual wherewithal, OR the desire to accept Facts (empirical data.) Thanks. …….