New Jersey Governor Chris Christie: War on Drugs “A Failure”
By W. E. Messamore | 07/11/2012 | Drugs, Headline, Issues, Legislation, States | 31 CommentsTouting a new mandatory treatment program for non-violent drug offenders in the state of New Jersey, Governor Chris Christie is the latest high-ranking US government official to condemn the decades-long War on Drugs. In a speech Monday at the Washington, DC-based Brookings Institution, Christie called the War on Drugs a well-intentioned public policy failure:
“The War on Drugs, while well-intentioned, has been a failure, and that we’re warehousing addicted people every day in state prisons in New Jersey, giving them no treatment, sending them back out on the street after their term of incarceration, and wondering why recidivism rates go up, and why they don’t get better, why the commit crimes again. Well they commit crimes to support their addiction.”
In the criminal justice world, recidivism refers to repeated criminal activity that occurs even after incarceration, creating a cycle of crime and incarceration in which the recidivistic criminal spends life in and out of jail without ever being rehabilitated. Gov. Christie’s solution is mandatory drug treatment for non-violent drug offenders:
“You can certainly make the argument that no one should try drugs in the first place, and I certainly am in that camp, but tens of millions of people in our society do every year. And for some people they can try it and walk away from it, but for others, the first time they try it, they become an addict. And they’re sick. And they need treatment. So I say what we need to do, is for all first time, non-violent drug offenders, we need to make drug treatment mandatory.”
Christie’s remarks are just the latest of many indications that the American public is warming to an open, fact-based, cost-benefit discussion of drug policy in the United States, but civil libertarians and opponents of prohibition might not care for Christie’s approach to the issue. Not only did he tie his position in with his views on abortion in a curious non sequitur, he dressed it in the paternalistic language of religious stewardship over other human lives and justified it as part of a divinely-sanctioned imperative to put every person that New Jersey technocrats deem as “drug dependent” in a mandatory year-long treatment program:
“Because if you’re pro-life, as I am, you can’t be pro-life just in the womb. Every life is precious and every one of God’s creatures can be redeemed, but they won’t be if we ignore them, and I believe that this program, which was passed overwhelmingly by the legislature this year, and will be phased in over the next five years, will allow every person who comes into the criminal justice system in New Jersey with a drug addiction, to get a year of mandatory drug treatment in house. And I believe that the results [that] will show after this is fully implemented will be startling.”
Indeed, the new mandatory treatment program, passed in June, does nothing to repeal failed drug policies, or counter federal ones on a state level by way of decriminalization. Instead, it gives the state more power to make personal decisions for its residents about their bodies. Instead of offering treatment, the new bill mandates it for anyone a court with its attendant technocracy of medical professionals deems “drug dependent.” Is treating a citizen as in need of mandatory medical treatment for possessing an illicit drug any less presumptuous than treating him or her as a criminal? Will the program be any less riddled with unintended consequences? This wouldn’t be the first time Chris Christie rubbed libertarians the wrong way.
The first governor in the United States to publicly condemn the War on Drugs was New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, currently the Libertarian Party’s 2012 presidential candidate. In 1999, Johnson– then a Republican– called the War on Drugs an “expensive bust,” and at that time was the highest-ranking government official in the United States to call for the legalization of marijuana since the beginning of the decades-long War on Drugs during the Nixon Administration. Other governors to condemn US drug policy in recent years include Hawaii’s Gov. Benjamin J. Cayetano, a Democrat, and Minnesota’s Gov. Jesse Ventura, a member of the Reform Party.






Leave Your Comment →
31 Comments
Amos Cooper
07.11.2012
@adcooper12
Could we possibly see a shift in the drug war soon? Especially since more officials are becoming outspoken in their opposition. Also don’t forget that Mexico could be taking a different stance when cleaning up their streets.
The visitor
07.11.2012
The CIA has the monopoly on drugs, why not ask them to cease importing them to your country? The real war on drugs is the government offensive against private citizens that attempt to cash in on the action. It’s a trillion dollar business that also pays towards the occupation & and manipulation of other countries resources, not just the tax payer, that funds the military & weapons.
Craig D. Schlesinger
07.12.2012
@craigschlesinger
Thirteen years after Johnson came out publicly against the drug war, and we’re still having the same uninformed conversations. The establishment press and politicians love to control the national narrative, keep people in blissful ignorance, and appeal to their baser instincts (fear and greed). We need to wake up and stop the most violent, racist, destructive policy since slavery. Christie has a real opportunity to lead here.
Eddie Stephens
07.12.2012
It coincided with the legislation permitting the privatization of prisons. Soon after, the non-violent rates of incarcerations skyrocketed and continues. And the judges got rich too.
Gifford Alexander
07.12.2012
Yes.
Chad Nordstrom
07.12.2012
Of course he’s right. That’s obvious, not rocket science. I know little else about the guy, but he’s spot on with the godawful war on drugs.
John Harper
07.12.2012
I think so.
Travis Logan
07.12.2012
“This implies their is a war going on somewhere, and people on drugs are winning it.” – Bill Hicks
Jeff Smith
07.12.2012
Unless of course you are reaping the profits off of illegal drugs, then it has been a great success.
Clinton Chrisman
07.12.2012
Very true. Their hands are tied, they are out manned, out gunned and the bad guns have more sophisticated equipment. The money that is confiscated needs to go directly back to the Border Enforcement and not paying for holidays and vacations. We can’t win a war we can’t fight.
Frank Visage
07.12.2012
That’s the first intelligent thing I’ve heard come out of his blow hole.
James Robinson
07.12.2012
Holy crap! It took this long for someone to figure this out! We’
Joseph P Campbell
07.12.2012
Then why is he vetoing the vote to decriminalize Cannabis stating its not the states role to challenge the Fed law, yet he is challenging the federal ban for Sports Gambling in his state.
James Robinson
07.12.2012
Holy crap! It took this long for someone to figure this out! We’ve elected a bunch of nitwits!!!!!
Carlos Los-Man Guzman
07.12.2012
AGREED. Billions of dollars and 100s of lives if not thousands lost. Either legalize it here or do something to help create a better climate for poor people who have no other means of income abroad
Brian Wilson
07.12.2012
Yes
Bill English
07.12.2012
No doubt about it. Jailing the sick non violent person does no good and much harm. Mandatory treatment alternative, a positive step toward other nations’ successes with this issue.
Ariel H Fradin
07.12.2012
This rude, worthless gas-bag actually has a correct opinion for once?
Damn. Guess it’s true what they say about broken clocks!
Richard Griffin
07.12.2012
Obviously.
Joe Neale
07.12.2012
Yes he is right
Gary McCorvey
07.12.2012
As a former prosecutor and major felony judge in Georgia, REPEAL MARIJUANA PROHIBITION, NOW!
Peter Tiberius Acker
07.12.2012
Somehow the War on Drugs may have actually made the drug situation in America worse. If you arrest and imprison someone, they generally come out worse than when they went in.
Peter Tiberius Acker
07.12.2012
A lot of PhDs smoke pot. Almost EVERYONE has smoked pot. This is SO different than a meth head or a crack head or a heroin addict. These latter people need HELP. Many were born into situations you and I can hardly imagine.
Christopher Michael Miklasz
07.12.2012
Agree.
Kevin Whitbeck
07.12.2012
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out its been a half assed failure from the beginning. But having said that the world would be alot worse without it.
Deborah Tennesen
07.12.2012
Christy is right, but he has his own food demons!
Ronald Edwards
07.12.2012
If it’s really a war, what are the political motivations of each side? Also, why aren’t we sitting down at the negotiating table to discuss how we can come to terms with each-other? This isn’t a war, it’s a biased injunction on specific commerce… one where both sides will stop at nothing to win.
W. E. Messamore
07.12.2012
@W__E__Messamore
“This isn’t a war, it’s a biased injunction on specific commerce…”
^What a great sentence!
Craig D. Schlesinger
07.13.2012
@craigschlesinger
Here here!
Jimmy Rose
07.12.2012
why can’t our farmers grow hemp it’s not pot can not get high on it.
W. E. Messamore
07.15.2012
@W__E__Messamore
In 21st century America, George Orwell’s doublethink is alive and well: War is Peace, Ignorance is Strength, Freedom is Slavery, Obama is Change, Pizza is a Vegetable, and Industrial Hemp is a Drug.