GOP Primary Proves Establishment Can No Longer Ignore Paul Supporters
By Kymberly Bays | 06/04/2012 | Elections 2012, Louisiana, President | 24 CommentsWhile the mainstream media has Governor Mitt Romney’s nomination as a lock, Dr. Ron Paul continues to accumulate delegates at a healthy pace. So many delegates, in fact, the Republican parties in more than one state are trying to impose loyalty oaths in order to disenfranchise elected Paul delegates currently pledged to other candidates. The Boston Globe editorialized recently against these state Republican strategies, citing that “rules can’t be changed midway through the process just because they become inconvenient.”
The editorial continued:
“According to party rules, Romney’s campaign had more to do to get its own people chosen as the delegates to the Tampa convention; they had to show up at local party caucuses, the obscure gatherings where delegates are actually chosen. They didn’t, at least not to the degree that Paul’s supporters did. To the extent that Paul’s zealous supporters abided by the caucus rules in place, they deserve the delegates that they won.”
The editorial hits on a point IVN has stated repeatedly: looking ahead to 2016, primary rules should be changed so that delegates are chosen specifically by candidates.
In the meantime, the Real 2012 Delegate Count offers a state-by-state breakdown accurately reflecting current delegate allocations. Gov. Romney currently has 627 delegates, Dr. Paul has 186, former Senator Rick Santorum has 146, former Speaker Newt Gingrich has 66, and 1258 delegates are yet to be allocated at State Conventions.
The reason for the continued misreporting on the delegate allocation process is a basic misunderstanding of delegate selection rules. Only 35% of the delegates selected are chosen by a candidate and explicitly bound to said candidate. This poses a problem to Gov. Romney, as well as his continuing lack of grassroots support and/or enthusiasm.
This is illustrated in Missouri where a recent Public Policy Poll indicated Gov. Romney and President Obama were essentially tied. In 2008, Missouri was eventually carried by a small margin by Senator McCain. In the beauty contest primary months ago, Gov. Romney was trounced by Senator Santorum and since then Dr. Paul supporters have subsequently swept the precinct caucuses where real delegates are chosen. This past weekend, the Missouri State Convention was held with claims and counterclaims of foul behavior. Gov. Romney came away with 31 delegates, Senator Santorum got 13 delegates, and Dr. Paul got 4 delegates. State Conventions also occurred in Louisiana and Washington State.
In Louisiana, Sen. Santorum won the primary. Yet, in the “real” delegate selection process, nearly 75% of the delegates to the Louisiana State Convention were Dr. Paul supporters. Sen. Santorum sent Louisiana GOP Chairman Roger Villere a list of twenty “bona fide” supporters who he would like to see filling the ten delegate and ten alternate slots he won in the state’s March 24 primary. Sen. Santorum called attention to what he called “delegate stealing” in a communication with the Louisiana state GOP after the Paul campaign out-organized other GOP candidates in other state conventions.
“We just tightened up the rules. We made it more responsible so that delegates for those candidates would be elected, instead of Ron Paul people posing as supporters of those candidates,” Minority Convention Credential Committee Chairman Jeff Giles told KTBS, the ABC-TV affiliate in Shreveport, Louisiana.
Predictably, the Louisiana State Convention turned into a melee. The social conservatives who control Louisiana’s GOP vowed to stop Paul takeovers. At the end of the day, the Paul supporters captured 27 of Louisiana’s 46 Republican delegates. Dr. Paul supporters also elected one of their own, Henry Herford, to a senior party post. Emotions inevitably ran high, and Herford was removed from the convention hall by security officers after he became embroiled in a dispute with other Republican activists.
According to a statement released by the national Ron Paul campaign, the newly elected Louisiana delegates met with Scott Sewell, the Louisiana Chair of Gov. Romney’s campaign, who said “he would do everything he could to make sure the Paulites controlled delegation was seated.”
Whether the convention chaos occurring at recent state conventions across the country is a result of a coordinated national effort by Republican Party leaders to disenfranchise Ron Paul delegates, or vice versa, the bottom line is that Dr. Paul continues to amass delegates. Antics aside, there are two types of jurisdictions which bear particular attention.
First, are those jurisdictions where Gov. Romney lost to Sen. Santorum or Speaker Gingrich in the primary and where the delegates are chosen in a discreet process. In those States, Dr. Paul supporters have been very successful. Given Sen. Santorum and Speaker Gingrich have suspended their campaigns, there is no pressing reason for evangelical Christian activists to turn out at delegate selection venues to participate in the election process. Given that Romney has no support, the Paulites flood these events and win elections as uncommitted or nominal Santorum, or even Gingrich, delegates.
There have been exceptions, of course, to this “Ron Paul takeover”, those being Oklahoma and Georgia. Even so, there are at least ten Dr. Paul supporters in the Georgia delegation. Gov. Romney could compete for those delegates but continues to lack the infrastructure to do so. As part and parcel of this process, the Paulites are also gaining control of state party organizations and it’s in these jurisdictions where Paul supporters are at war with former Sen. Santorum and Speaker Gingrich supporters.
Second, are jurisdictions where Gov. Romney won the primary with a binding process but the delegates are still chosen in a discrete process. In many of those states, Dr. Paul forces ended up controlling who Gov. Romney’s delegates would be. Massachusetts is a good example of a state falling in this category.
The next place where a similar scenario play out is Texas, who uses a proportionate representation allocation system. Per The Green Papers, Gov. Romney received 105 delegates, Dr. Paul received 18 delegates, Sen. Santorum received 12 delegates, Speaker Gingrich received 7 delegates, there were 6 uncommitted delegates, and Michele Bachmann and Jon Huntsman received one delegate a piece.
On Thursday, the Texas Republican State Convention convenes in Fort Worth, where the National Convention delegates will be elected according to the results of the primary. 108 district delegates are elected at the Convention: 3 from each of the state’s 36 congressional districts, as well as 44 at-large delegates.
Delegates are elected by Presidential Preference from the congressional districts in which their candidate received the highest percentage of the vote, providing the candidate received at least 20% or more of the vote. This goes on until the candidate’s delegate allotment is fulfilled. Then, the process is repeated for the second highest vote getter. Once all congressional district delegates are selected, the at-large delegates are selected. This is the exact type of nuanced situation where Paul supporters can and will dominate.
Paul supporters are doing so well throughout the country, by and large, because state Republican Parties are small, atrophied clubs controlled by older social conservatives who cannot match the Paulite enthusiasm.
As former California Assembly Speaker Willie L. Brown noted in his column in the San Francisco Chronicle, the Republican Party in California is in decline. In his inimical way, Brown noted:
“I see that George Shultz and Condoleezza Rice endorsed Mitt Romney at his big Hillsborough fundraiser. It just goes to show how thin the GOP bench is in California. No state officials. No big-city mayors. No real congressional stars. Just George and Condoleezza, recycled again. And after looking at the average age of the guests, I can see why Mitt doesn’t bring up Social Security as an issue.”
What Brown observed is also true in a number of states – the traditional GOP is on a downward trajectory. It has been 24 years since Ronald Reagan left the White House. A 30-year-old voter who supported Reagan in 1980 is 62 today. It does not take an election expert to realize, unless the party grows and modernizes, Republicans could be regulated to irrelevancy. In that sense, to find the Paulite Wing of the Republican Party fighting it out with the Santorum Social Conservatives is really not shocking.
There is inherent conflict between the Romney campaign and Republican Parties in states where Romney did not run well and/or where he has no role in selecting his delegates. These are the same states where Ron Paul supporters are racking up delegates, particularly in the south where Gov. Romney ran so poorly it has created a vacuum.
Romney supporters and the Republican old guard are focused on avoiding major distractions at the Convention in Tampa. In other words, they have every incentive to placate the Paulites. As such, Gov. Romney’s support to seat the Paulites from Louisiana is logical. After all, if he loses in the general, Paulites are no longer his problem. In many states, the Republican establishment is looking at the long term prospects for themselves. From this prism, the “Paul Threat” is much more immediate and direct. Whether Gov. Romney wins or loses, the organizational wherewithal the libertarian wing of the Republican Party has shown this election cycle guarantees these state parties will have to deal with these forces on their own in the future.






Leave Your Comment →
24 Comments
scottcameron
06.04.2012
@scottcameron
He (Paul) seems to have won some conventions, though, and that’s where ‘the rubber meets the road’ in our political system. The primary and caucus votes are facade of democracy in a small-r republican system.
Selection of delegates, committeemen, and electors are overlooked by the media, because it seems so arcane compared to the horse race nature of popular elections. That’s a shame because those people selected at local, state, and national conventions are the ones who select the candidates, set the platforms, and eventually elect a president.
The often-repeated axiom is “we’re a republic, not a democracy”. Rep. Paul’s success in gaining delegates at some state conventions is illustrative of that axiom. A highly motivated minority can be extremely influential in a republic. This is not an accident. The whole system is set up for just this sort of thing.
OutWithTheOld
06.04.2012
Very true. Some people think this caucus system is flawed, but it was put into place precisely so that uninformed voters who don’t take the time to research the candidates and the issues are NOT the ones who actually select the nominee. The caucus system and delegate process was designed so that those who DO take the time to become involved, and who have studied the issues, can make a difference in the outcome. Otherwise, it is too easy to simply manipulate the masses via the media and control who becomes the nominee, as they have attempted to do this time around with shoving Romney down our throats as the nominee from the very beginning, and the only mentions of Ron Paul for a very long time were simply that he is “unelectable.” Thank goodness for the caucus system so America is not the constant victim of this kind of media collusion and election rigging.
Ryan McLain
06.04.2012
@vote3rdparty
Fantastic article! Hopefully, he does achieve the upset and forces the mainstream media to recognize what is occurring.
debramckinney
06.04.2012
@debramckinney
Don’t you mean, “try” to ignore? We’re American citizens and we still have the right to decide who we want to vote for and who we won’t vote for. The RNC and the GOP are just as bad as the tyrant they say they want to defeat. If they want to defeat Obama, they gonna have to get behind the people because the people are behind Ron Paul.
OutWithTheOld
06.04.2012
This is one of the best, most balanced articles I have read yet on the GOP primary. It’s not perfect, but I’m not going to split hairs over some of your choices of wording or failure to go into more detail about all the fraud and cheating by the Romney supporters in multiple states. Overall it’s still a great article. Clearly you have studied what’s going on and you present a much more fair picture of events than almost all other writers I’ve read lately, who tend to only regurgitate the lies and distortions promulgated by the Associated Press. Thank you!!!
slodrew
06.04.2012
Federal law and the Republican party’s own rules forbid delegates from being bound to any candidate once they get to the convention. In 2008 a delegate from Utah which is supposedly a winner take all state that McCain won was allowed to vote for Romney in the first round of voting at the national convention and it’s likely to come back and haunt Romney. The system is not as broken as I thought. There is still hope that we can save our republic from the corrupt establishment politicians that continue to sell us out.
alphasatori
06.04.2012
ABSOLUTELY NO DELEGATES ARE BOUND, EVER. When will you media pundits get that through your thick heads?? Your water-carrying for the globalist, anti-Constitution establishment is so transparent it’s not even funny, you may want to work on that a bit, if only for your own sake.
Since you obviously don’t research any of the rubbish you print, I’ll inform the readers that it was not security guards that attempted to drag out Henry Herford, but rather, Shreveport Police, who were called by the Romney camp after one of their own, who WAS Chairman, had been legally voted out by a majority. Apparently, the Romney-fueled establishment whined a call to the police, complaining that he’d been voted out, and, for some mysterious reason, the Shreveport Police showed up and began dragging off a handicapped, elderly Henry Herford, the man who’d been legally voted as the NEW Chairman. Herford, who has a dislocated hip, was pulled forcefully for no other reason than having legally unseated a whining Romney delegate. It was all captured on film and after the altercation, one of the corrupt police officers has the audacity to ask one of the individuals who’d filmed their tyrannical Gestapo-like actions for his cell phone as ‘evidence’. The individual who taped the altercation refused and got the video onto Youtube, for everyone to see, and to realize just how low the money-led Romney establishment will go to force themselves upon a GOP party that has no desire to support them.
Sam Shepherd
06.05.2012
Ron Paul is a better man ,one that wont take advantage of you,he will have my vote
Pam Mercier
06.05.2012
Threat? Rather poor choice of words, isn’t it? Consider everything the GOP has done to derail the RP train. They have lied, “lost” ballots, broke their own rules about nominations at the primary and caucus levels…the list goes on.
mary-janewilbur
06.05.2012
@mary-janewilbur
In the world of comedic reporting, finally, someone who took the time to verify , research and report the facts. Good job Kymberly! Now march in there and ask your boss for a raise!
Sanjay
06.05.2012
Hard money, Constitutional government, Armed Neutrality, Free enterprise, large traditional families.
This is where conservatives and libertarians should join hands and send the bloodthirsty neocons back to Democratic Mob Party where they came from.
50% of Democrat funding and 25% GOP funding comes from Jewish Billionaires. Sound money will benefit the little guy, not the rich, the elite.
Chad
06.05.2012
Federal law says all delegates are unbound. Get the word out peeps!!!!
Chad
06.05.2012
http://www.examiner.com/article/federal-law-all-delegates-are-unbound
Go here for the story!
johnbowery
06.05.2012
@johnbowery
While appearing to be even-handed, this article fails to make clear that the ‘struggle’ so far has been completely one-sided, with the Paul delegates playing honestly and peacefully while the ‘establishment’ abuse their positions to game the system; change the rules in midstream; cancel, postpone, and prematurely adjourn conventions; hire goons to assault legally elected officials; bring in fake delegates with counterfeit credentials; publish forged candidate slates; etc. etc. etc.
By contrast, in a state (Iowa) where the Paul supporters were already in positions of authority on the state central committee, the conventions were all run smoothly and honestly. In Iowa, every delegate was given his/her chance to vote, raise objections, and serve as duly elected chairs.
The article rightly identifies the challenge of the Republican Party slipping into irrelevancy, but portrays the Ron Paul Republicans as another threat rather than the CURE for her problems.
Thomas Brown
06.05.2012
Great article Kym. really points out that Paul supporters will outlast the old Neo-Con wing of the Party. As a delegate going to the National Convention for the state of PA I am re energized after reading the delegate count. I did not think Romney had enough to clinch the nomination but haven’t been able to find reliable numbers.
Evelyn Billington
06.05.2012
I hope Ron Paul makes it onto the ballets.
Tres
06.06.2012
Very well researched and written article. The one aspect that you may have over looked, and I haven’t seen it reported much, is how the GOP antics are upsetting the GOP old guard that is active but not necessarily part of the establishment. That find the methods of their own party abhorrent and could be so disgusted that they stay home in November.
Diana
06.06.2012
Wow, that sounds like me! I’m a retired, socially as well as fiscally conservative woman, and “active GOP old guard.” If Ron Paul is not the nominee, I’m staying home.
ODIrony
06.06.2012
“Herford was removed from the convention hall by security officers after he became embroiled in a dispute with other Republican activists.” Uh, actually, he was elected chair and the temporary chair refused to accept his election and had him removed. It’s not like he was starting a fight. Check out Youtube for the evidence of what happened.
ODIrony
06.06.2012
“Whether the convention chaos occurring at recent state conventions across the country is a result of a coordinated national effort by Republican Party leaders to disenfranchise Ron Paul delegates, or vice versa…” Has anyone evidence of Ron Paul supporters falsifying slate lists or breaking party rules, and/or potentially breaking federal election laws? If so, Please share it!
ODIrony
06.06.2012
While I can’t say this article is one supporting Representative Paul, it does provide some incidental insight. By its analysis of the Paul campaign strategy and the corresponding weakness of the Romney campaign one would not be wrong to infer that the Romney campaign is an inherently weak one with little popular support. The inference to be drawn is that the GOP leadership are mostly older establishment types unwilling to bend to the increasingly numerous younger members who are turning to a more Constiutional-Federalist view more akin to Senator Goldwater than to Presidents Bush I & II. That the RNC is headed for a trouncing at the polls this year is undeniable. What is yet to be revealed is how the party will react to reality after the November election.
Skny John
06.06.2012
ron paul supporters are a cult, & no cult is large enough to elect anyone president.
Diana
06.06.2012
If all you can do is name call, shut the H*ll up. You’re what, an Obomney supporter?
Ryan McLain
06.07.2012
@vote3rdparty
Being a Ron Paul supporter doesn’t make someone part of a “cult”? He’s merely a thought provoking individual with a different approach to things. Considering the current climate of the country, It’s clear a different approach is needed. Every new group starts small. 45% of young people (I believe 18-30 year olds, I’m recalling on memory of media coverage during the primaries) supported Ron Paul. That’s a majority. I don’t think a majority can be considered a cult.