Florida Governor Rick Scott’s Purge of Voter Rolls Sparks Controversy
By Timothy Troutner | 05/31/2012 | Elections 2012, Electoral Reform, President, State Office | 3 CommentsIt’s election time in America, and all aspects of the unfolding political battle have become top news. Researchers try to dig up dirt on candidates and analysts sift through survey data to project results. One aspect of the election year struggle, however, is often ignored. Voter registration is a battle within the larger war to win in November. After all, whoever determines who can vote can influence the election itself.
In Florida, Governor Rick Scott has embarked on an election year purge of the voter rolls. This move is ostensibly a protection of election integrity, but not everyone sees it that way. The purpose of the purge is to remove non-citizens from the voting rolls, ensuring a legal and fair election. According to ThinkProgress:
“Chris Cate, a spokesman for the state Division of Elections, defended the state’s actions. ’It’s very important we make sure ineligible voters can’t cast a ballot… We won’t be sending any new names to supervisors until the information we have is updated, because we always want to make sure we are using the best information available… I don’t have a timetable on when the next list of names will be sent to supervisors, but there will be more names.’”
The concern about finding the best information highlights one of the main criticisms of the Florida voter purge: flawed databases. To purge the voter rolls, a database of citizens must be compared to voter registration rolls. However, the database the state is using to determine citizenship is the state motor vehicle database. Many groups have pointed out the deep problems with this method of checking voter eligibility. The Miami Herald reports one group’s concern about the Florida voter purge, especially considering recent history:
“Based on Florida’s regrettable experience with voter purges,” said Howard Simon, ACLU of Florida’s executive director, “it would be a mistake to rely on the accuracy of the state’s data — especially data from the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles that is acknowledged by the DHSMV to be out of date.”
The 2000 presidential election is an example of how voter roles can affect the outcome of an election. Although the infamous ‘hanging chad’ got the press, a voter purge of felons occurred right before the election, and may have changed the outcome of the razor-thin race. Opposition groups are wary of the power given to the administration in power. The power to control the voting list is dangerous indeed, and mirrors independent voters’ concerns about ballot access for third parties. Some political leaders have even alleged that the purge is politically motivated. A local Democratic chairman said:
“It’s not by accident that Florida is doing this and all these other states that have Republican governors are doing it… The odds are too high that they had the same independent thought of each other.”
Attempts to control voter registration are characteristic of those in power, apart from party affiliation. Regardless, it is a worrying development for the U.S. citizens who are being erroneously targeted by the purge, including a 91-year old World War II veteran born in the United States.
“Internicola said he was ‘flabbergasted’ by the suggestion that he wasn’t a citizen. He called the county’s election office and said: ‘Are you crazy?’”
The errors in databases and allegations of a partisan power play emphasize what independent voters should already know: while it sounds good to think that voters can check politicians in the voting booth, the realities of gerrymandering, ballot access, and voter registration mean that government officials have the final say. It is too early to determine how many voters who are actually ineligible will be purged from the voting rolls, but the process is a worrying development for those who must prove their citizenship and right to vote. This is a wake-up call for all Americans. If the ballot box is powerful, determining who can cast a ballot is a truly frightening power.





Leave Your Comment →
3 Comments
lolysmith
05.31.2012
@lolysmith
Gov Scott needs to go!
Please go and sign the Petition below! and pass it on to everyone you know.
If the address below does not work go to Google and type in: Signon Florida Right of Recall.
http://signon.org/sign/florida-right-of-recall?source=mo&id=34247-17237865-MexV3Ix
S B
05.31.2012
@sb23
Some of the things that Mr. Troutner states carry more weight than most people—maybe including even Mr. Troutner himself—can imagine. Two of the statements made in the article that have the most poignant impact on me are “The power to control the voting list is dangerous indeed…” and “determining who can cast a ballot is a truly frightening power”. How true indeed. That is precisely the reason that that power should be treated with reverence and treated as a sacred thing. Time and time again history has shown mankind that epic failures follow both the abuse of power and the disrespect of things that should be held in the highest esteem. Unfortunately, not enough humans ever take the lessons to heart and, as a result, new epic failures keep emerging. Regulating the election process in a democracy is one of the greatest powers one can possess and it is also a privilege that demands that those in possession of that power treat their positions with the utmost dignity. It definitely fits the bill as the type of power that, when not handled properly, can result in one of the epic failures that I allude to above. Whoever doesn’t believe that should consider the following: The names of all those involved in activities deemed questionable (that is, deemed questionable by the general consensus) during the 2000 election will live on in infamy in the minds of those who bore witness to the election aftermath for a long-long time. 12 years have passed and many people who don’t follow politics are still familiar with several of those names…for the involved parties’ sakes I won’t mention their names here.
All of what I’ve stated above brings me to the following commentary. The commentary relates to a message that was previously posted elsewhere (see below, information was updated on 05/07/2012). The public, legal professionals, and law-abiding public servants should be aware of the issue I touch upon. Public corruption by some is underway and, regarding the election process in Florida, in at least one area of the state things are amiss…possibly in ways that most people wouldn’t imagine.
Although the below comments were previously posted elsewhere it’s fitting that I share them here.
—————————————————
Comment 1
As the saying goes…sometimes “truth is stranger than fiction”. This article is part satire, part sad reality, and part serious commentary reflective of the track record associated with Florida. Having stated that, the second from the last sentence of the article inadvertently strikes a serious chord. Oh how I wish Mr. Frank Cerabino had posed the following question to Governor Scott as well–Question: “Please explain how the state could willingly in effect condone the entanglement of a proven criminally-corrupt judge in Florida’s election process?” For the record, the state is aware that at least one proven criminally-corrupt judge is entangled in Florida’s election process (that one proven criminally-corrupt judge is none other than David P. Kreider)…all of this sentence is 100% true. Florida already has enough blemishes on its election history record. The leadership of the state claims to be doing everything within its power to stave off instances of voter fraud—instances of voter fraud which, historically speaking, seem to be relatively rare—while amazingly, simultaneously, and willingly in effect condoning at least one serious election impropriety. All things considered regarding Florida’s administrators’ recent election-related posturing and actions, much of what is currently going on has the smell of “chest beating”…and worse. To use an analogy, regarding this current Florida election business, many of those entrusted with administering Florida’s election affairs are focused on “sweeping particles of dirt off the kitchen floor” when the “stove is on fire”. Ultimately all the voter reform in the world won’t matter one iota in a jurisdiction that has a corrupt cog as a component in its “election machine”. The citizens of the state and the citizens of the nation deserve, and expect, better. The public, legal professionals, and law-abiding public servants should be aware of this undeniable issue…
—————————-
Comment 2
Now Chris Cate, the spokesman for the Secretary of State, is quoted as stating “…This is a voting integrity issue, something we worry about all the time”; implying that issues related to voter integrity are always of paramount concern to the state. This should unquestionably be the case, but facts reflect that that is not the case in Florida…that is highly troubling. Public corruption by some is underway and, regarding the election process in Florida, in at least one area of the state things are amiss…possibly in ways that most people wouldn’t imagine. Though Mr. Cate may not have knowledge of the things addressed in this message, the state of Florida undeniably does possess that knowledge. Having stated that, I find the official state-issued statement “…This is a voting integrity issue, something we worry about all the time” appallingly contradictory. Be you a Republican, Democrat, etc., always remain vigilant. In Ms. Smith’s closing she states “In the last 12 years our creaky, mistake-pocked elections process has helped define and, on occasion, shame us…” It goes without saying that the nation does not want any election drama this year. The election process must be as pure as possible…
—————————-
Comment 3
Boy did Governor Rick Scott nail it when he, according to the AP article, said “people lie”. I’m glad to see the state cleaning up the voter rolls. However, a bit of research reveals that the consensus amongst many is that instances of voter fraud seem to be relatively few and far between. Conversely, what can’t be denied is that in the current climate gamesmanship and outright cheating run rife amongst those with the most to gain/lose. That being stated, election fraud is a very real threat. That being the case, the charge that I’d really like to see Governor Scott, Secretary of State Ken Detzner, and all the rest of Governor Scott’s immediate cohorts lead is the charge to excise corrupt actors from the election process. Right now in Alachua County there is a proven criminally-corrupt judge—a judge by the name of David P. Kreider—that has been illegally entangled in Florida’s 2012 election process. The state is aware of this undeniable fact yet it has continued to improperly display a multi-dimensional lack of concern. The below message provides some insight into this issue.
—————
Next stop Gainesville, Fla. (i.e. “Gator Country”). “Why specifically?”, you ask.
Because in Alachua County, within recent months, numerous and egregious violations of law have been committed that warrant multiple criminal prosecutions and other severe government sanctions. These crimes have had all types of deleterious effects including, but not limited to, once again placing the integrity of Florida’s election results (for 2012) in jeopardy. A few of the things that are central to this issue are:
1
David P. Kreider [Mr. Kreider, a proven criminal, is a corrupt Alachua County Court judge. This criminally-corrupt judge also happens to be both (a) one of the circuit's former prosecutors and (b) a former Division Chief for the State Attorney's Office.]
2
Robert Roundtree, Chief Judge for Florida’s 8th Judicial Circuit (he recently replaced the embattled Martha Lott who resigned from her chief judge post subsequent to becoming embroiled in this scandal which has started to implode; her resignation was announced on 04/09/2012 and was reported to have gone into effect on 04/05/2012)
3
Spencer Mann, Chief Investigator for the State Attorney’s Office of Florida’s 8th Judicial Circuit
4
William “Bill” Cervone, State Attorney for Florida’s 8th Judicial Circuit
5
The conspiracy / scandal related to the “Gibson Case”
6
The two irrefutable reports and extensive corroborating evidence that is in the possession of agencies, including those within Florida’s 8th Judicial Circuit (and the aforementioned Spencer Mann and Chief Judge’s office). The comprehensive reports and evidence span a total of more than 100 pages and in-depthly detail criminal activities carried out under the color of law by criminal/judge David P. Kreider and various other co-conspirators.
http://www.complaints.com/2012/march/14/Corrupt_Judge_David_P._Kreider_now_taints_the_ele_264712.htm
[Updated most recently on 05/07/2012. This is the initial url and the complaint at this url will remain online to serve as a referral to the below mandated url.]
http://www.complaints.com/2012/may/21/Corrupt_Judge_David_P._Kreider_now_taints_the_ele_266368.htm
[This is where all of the updates following 05/07/2012 will be in the future. As of today (05/31/2012) no post-05/07/2012 information is posted here. See the note at the bottom of this comment.]
This is the gateway to serious corruption and a major cover-up attempt.
Note:
Inexplicably, at this critical time, the ability to update the completely truthful complaint that is displayed at the above listed initial complaints.com url has been blocked (this problem just arose in mid-May 2012). Complaints.com was notified in hopes that the issue would be remedied promptly (especially before the involved co-conspirators made any additional damaging/wrongful maneuvers or inappropriately benefited from the dissemination of any additional misinformation outside of scrutiny). For the most part, as of now (05/31/2012), to the best of my knowledge the report at the initial url is up-to-date and the involved co-conspirators haven’t executed any additional illicit maneuvers that haven’t already at least been touched upon in that initial complaints.com webpage complaint. On 05/19/2012 complaints.com indicated that it would no longer be possible to update the information at the well-publicized initial webpage/url and essentially that the complaint would have to be duplicated and that all future updates would have to be made at a new complaints.com webpage/url.
Bob Morris
05.31.2012
@Bob_Morris
And where are the loud protests from Democrats?