Left’s Attacks on Limbaugh Unlikely to Make a Difference
By Alan Markow | 03/05/2012 | Health Care, Legislators | 18 Comments
Credit: Business Insider
The left has gone bonkers over Rush Limbaugh’s attack on a woman who testified on family planning and birth control at a recent Congressional hearing, and the mild self-rebuke that followed. Limbaugh called the woman a slut and a prostitute for her willingness to deal with intimate, personal issues such as contraception.
There is glee across the left end of the web because some of Rush’s sponsors have pulled out of his program, and there seems to be a belief that his demise is near.
Websites such as Credo Action and Left Action are proclaiming an apocalyptic collapse of all things Rush as a result of the brouhaha.
“Enough is enough,” wrote Left Action. “It is time for Rush Limbaugh’s sponsors to stop supporting his hate speech through their advertising dollars.”
And from the Credo Action website:
“The backlash has been so great that even after doubling down in defense of his reprehensible comments, Limbaugh was forced to issue a rare — and totally insufficient — apology stating ‘my choice of words was not the best’.”
The reality is likely to be quite different from the left’s doom and gloom perspective because Rush retains a huge and loyal radio audience and wields considerable influence over the political right and the Republican Party.
This issue stemmed from hearings on contraception and the right of religious institutions to refuse to supply contraceptives based on their moral principles. The hearings, held by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA), famously featured only men in its initial panel. One woman who sought the opportunity to testify – Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke –was rejected by Issa, but was invited to testify at a subsequent Democratic hearing on the same subject.
After her testimony supporting access to free or low-cost contraceptives through any medical provider, Fluke was attacked by Limbaugh with these words:
“What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute… She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception.”
Limbaugh has since made the following apology:
“For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke.”
Credo Action proudly proclaimed, “Since we started our campaign, several major advertisers have pulled their support from the Rush Limbaugh Show.” Those advertisers include LegalZoom, Quicken Loans and Sleep Number, according to ABC News.
There is no question that Limbaugh’s description of Ms. Fluke was horrendous. But the reality is that a radio show as popular as Rush Limbaugh’s likely has a backlog of advertisers ready to replace those who have departed. In addition, once this dust-up has subsided, major advertisers who have jumped ship are likely to return. The chances that this event will be fatal or even seriously damaging to the Rush Limbaugh Show seem remote. Fans of Limbaugh will not take his tepid apology seriously, and Rush is unlikely to change his style, politics or approach enough for anyone to notice a difference.
In fact, it is a sign of Limbaugh’s authority in the political arena that the left has reacted so strongly. Rather than weaken him, the left’s attacks strengthen his hand and increase his influence with an audience that already distrusts liberalism and is unlikely to feel outrage by his comments.





Leave Your Comment →
18 Comments
gop08doa
03.05.2012
Too late. “Millions” of dittoheads have failed to have any sway on 7 major advertisers decisions to quit Limbaugh. I actually think the number of people who worship at the altar of the EIB network is way overstated.
Dire Straights
03.05.2012
You and others on the left don’t get it, nor are you ever likely to. All hail Obama.
Bob Morris
03.05.2012
What Limbaugh did was classic flame bait and the left fell for it big time
jen
03.05.2012
That was pretty inappropriate for someone with a job of speaking to the public to say, seems like his listeners didn’t react to it.
Ken
03.05.2012
Limbaugh’s comments were far worse and much more deliberate than the ones that cost Imus his radio show. I find it fascinating how his supporters brush these comments off. Hopefully his advertisers won’t.
Rightsadjerks
03.05.2012
The right wing political idiots that think this is helping them…are in for a nice surprise.
Your party is a party of hate and attack. That’s it. You have NOTHING to offer but hate and attack.
Pigs. Jerks. Losers. Creeps. Republicans.
There is no difference between a caveman and a republican man.
Alan Markow
03.05.2012
And the difference between Limbaugh’s name calling and rightsadjerks is…?
Mike Owens
03.05.2012
Alan, I believe you and I had this conversation on Saturday morning…It’s totally sad that we cannot have a discourse in America today without total breakdown of civility.
anonymoustom
03.05.2012
Correct on all. Couple of additional notes-
- Ed Shulz called Laura Ingraham a slut; no comment from the left, no phone call from Obama
- Fluke is not be a prostitute (we presume), but she may be worse. A prostitute demands money for sex, and all parties — payor and payee — reach an agreement. In Flukes case, she is the one who wants recreational sex and wants a third party (you and me) to pay for it. Maybe she thinks the govt should pay for my fishing poles and skis.
- This all tells you something bout the quality of people being turned out at Georgetown Law School.
Kymberly Bays
03.05.2012
Nice…staying anonymous while toeing the line between calling someone who had at least enough courage to step up in public in order to testify at a Congressional hearing, a prostitute “wanting recreational sex”. This is the problem, she’s not “worse” than a prostitute for wanting access to/coverage for birth control. The pill has multiple medical benefits that many women and girls benefit from. It’s not comparable to your fishing gear, but other medication also covered by providers like erectile dysfunction pills, beta-blockers, and prescriptions for migraines, anxiety, depression and a host of other conditions that never come under attack.
Also, pretty sure Ms. Fluke never asked for a free ride. She’ll be working, paying taxes and healthcare premiums in the future, funding the same system just like we do now…even as a low-life Georgetown Law graduate.
Anonymoustom
03.05.2012
What in the world are you talking about? Did you even read what I said? I distinctly said she isn’t a prostitute. Don’t
get me wrong; I think prostitution should be legal. Prostitutes don’t bother me. I just don’t do business with them – my choice. I said she was worse. Heck, whatever two people
want to do with each other is okay with me if I don’t have to pay for it. That’s why this woman is worse – she wants me
to pay for her recreational sex.
And by the way – did you say she was courageous? Courageous? Really?
This woman is a political hack who is eating this up. Or did she get dragged kicking and screaming
to the View against her will. Poor
thing, so brave. And to alleviate all
her fears she probably texted 500 of her closest friends for support. Now it looks like she will just have to
sacrifice her life and privacy for a career in Obama’s White House, all because
she is courageous.
All of that aside, there are medical benefits from
contraception as well as costs saved from unwanted pregnancies. However, I bet if you looked at the birth
rate to unwed mothers prior to the plethora of free available contraception, it
was far lower than it is today when free contraception is available everywhere. Free sex is one thing – getting others to pay
for it is another. “Dinner and a
movie? Great. I’ll buy dinner and we’ll get the taxpayers
to buy our pills.”
Bionicjoe
03.06.2012
No. She wants birth control to be covered as part of health treatment for a number of issues. She makes this point quite clear in the Congressional testimony.
Go watch it.
Cialis & Viagra are covered by insurance plans. These drugs have no purpose other than recreational sex.
Secondly birth control is NOT going to be paid for by tax payers. The debate is over whether or not an institution has the right to not cover certain treatments in their INSURANCE PLAN. Really you should watch or read the original testimony.
Anonymoustom
03.06.2012
Let’s see … everyone has to buy health insurance, and birth control has to be covered. You’re right! Not a tax! Forced to pay, but not a tax! Ingenious.
BTW – medical benefits you are talking about are available as medical treatment at most facilities. I’m not for viagra being covered – two wrongs don’t make a right. (Besides, those drugs treat medical conditions, which is somewhat, though only slightly, different).
Alan Markow
03.05.2012
AOL also pulled its advertising from the Rush Limbaugh show today. Situation seems to be getting worse for Rush. The question is, will it all blow over and make no real difference.
Brooke Doris
03.05.2012
You are assuming that this “dust-up” WILL subside… Guess what? It won’t because we will NOT let it go until Rush is off the air. THIS time, he has gone too far.
Bionicjoe
03.06.2012
“The chances that this event will be fatal or even seriously damaging to the Rush Limbaugh Show seem remote.”I bet the program manager who’s just lost a boatload of sponsors is taking it as a serious blow. Rush changed his tune after the people providing the money told him to. Who’s the prostitute?
Sam
03.06.2012
This is ridiculous, and she is totally right for not accepting that apology. There was no apology in there. Why? More than just the last three days he has been saying stuff like this to people, but in fact for years. He is only sorry his advertisements were pulled. http://tothecenter.com/2012/03/student-dismisses-rush-limbaugh-apology/ also goes into it a little bit.
Cliff Weathers
03.07.2012
Limbaugh has now lost 38 advertisers, both nationally and locally. Local stations are forced to put up public service announcements and programming notes in the absence of commercials. So, Mr. Markow, will you please show me these advertisers that are lining up to replace them?