Skip to content
Subscribe

Wis. GOP Lawmakers Want to Dismantle Nonpartisan Accountability Board

Published:

Republicans and Democrats in the Wisconsin legislature are snarling about 3 bills that propose the dissolution of the state's Government Accountability Board (GAB). The board currently oversees the state's election and campaign finance laws.

The bills call for the Board to be axed and replaced with two separate entities -- an elections commission and an ethics commission. Currently, the board is nonpartisan and comprised of 6 former judges appointed by the governor from nominations submitted by a committee of sitting appeals judges.

The proposed legislation calls for members of the two new commissions to be chosen by ranking members of the state legislature, such as the Senate majority leader and the speaker of the Assembly. Control of both committees would also be split between Republicans and Democrats.

While many citizens are concerned with issues like corruption and independent contributions to political campaigns, a notable provision of one of the bills doubles the limit on donations to political campaigns. The legislation also calls for the elimination of the state's "John Doe" probes, which allows prosecutors to conduct campaign finance investigations in complete secrecy.

The move to remove the GAB began when some Republican lawmakers claimed the board unfairly targeted conservative groups following a recall of the 2011 election results. Proponents of the legislation argue that the bills would do away with a crooked organization. Republican state Senator Leah Vukmir states, “It was naïve to think that you could have a nonpartisan board."

Proponents also cite the Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision regarding the GAB's investigation of Scott Walker's presidential campaign as justification for the reforms. The court refused to rule on the legality of the contributions investigated by the GAB, focusing mainly on the constitutionality of the Board conducting secret investigations. The court found the practice to be unconstitutional.

Opponents argue that the proposed legislation would allow politicians to be the arbiters of their own wrongdoings. Democratic Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca says, "These bills take us in the exact wrong direction–turning our nationally-respected watchdogs into partisan lapdogs and allowing corporations to have even more influence over Wisconsin."

While there are no signs of agreement, legislators will have to come to a consensus on whether or not the state's Government Accountability Board fairly conducts investigations and formulates campaign finance laws that are reasonable and beneficial to the citizens of Wisconsin.

Photo Credit:  Suzanne Tucker / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Wis. GOP Lawmakers Want to Dismantle Nonpartisan Accountability Board

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us