Why California's New Motor Voter Bill Won't Fix Low Turnout

image
Author: 420 Times
Published: 11 Sep, 2015
Updated: 18 Oct, 2022
2 min read

The California state Senate on Thursday approved a bill that would automatically register to vote any eligible Californian who receives a driver’s license unless they opt out.

The measure was prompted by the 42% turnout in the November 2014 election, as well as the turnout for the March 2014 election in Los Angeles, in which only about 10% of eligible voters went to the polls.

Nearly 7 million Californians, mostly young people, are eligible but not registered to vote. In an effort to boost the number, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego) introduced a bill modeled on a new law in Oregon to get more people to the polls.

The measure (AB 1461) was previously approved by the Assembly but returns there for approval of minor amendments and will almost certainly be signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown.

But the question remains as to the bill's efficacy: it will certainly accomplish its goal of increasing registration, but the bill only scratches the surface of the causes of diminished voter turnout.

According to a report by the Davenport Institute at Pepperdine University in conjunction with the National Conference on Citizenship on voting tendencies during the 2012 general election, lack of registration only accounts for a fraction of voter non-participation. The report produced the following results as to why citizens don't vote:

  • 20 percent of Californians cited "Too busy, conflicting work or school schedules"
  • 12 percent said that they were "Not interested, felt like my vote wouldn't make a difference"
  • 12 percent cited an "Illness or disability"
  • 10 percent said they experienced "Registration problems"
  • 10 percent "Didn't like candidates or campaign issues"
  • 9 percent were "Out of town or away from home"
  • 6 percent "Forgot to vote or send in absentee ballot"
  • 3 percent cited "Transportation problems"
  • 2 percent said that "Polling lines too long"

California has certainly addressed a wide variety of structural barriers to voting, including early voting, vote-by-mail, recent restoration of voting rights to tens of thousands of low-level felons, and now, the new automatic registration bill.

However, as a Californian, I find it troubling that 34% of those surveyed cited issues that have been easily avoidable for quite some time. I also find it troubling that it is clearly not the structural barriers, but the attitudinal ones, that are making the largest impact on voter turnout.

Civic engagement and participation in our core governing process, it seems, is at a premium these days. While attitudinal barriers are much more difficult to break through -- and will require leadership from inside and outside the state government -- they are a requisite for adequate representation in California's present and future. And they should be addressed sooner rather than later.

IVP Donate

Photo Source: AP

Latest articles

Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read
A man filling out his election ballot.
Oregon Activist Sues over Closed Primaries: 'I Shouldn't Have to Join a Party to Have a Voice'
A new lawsuit filed in Oregon challenges the constitutionality of the state’s closed primary system, which denies the state’s largest registered voting bloc – independent voters – access to taxpayer-funded primary elections. The suit alleges Oregon is denying the voters equal voting rights...
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Supreme Court Sides with Federal Corrections Officers in Lawsuit Over Prison Incident
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 30 that federal prison officers and officials cannot be sued by an inmate who accused them of excessive force during a 2021 incident, delivering a victory for federal corrections personnel concerned about rising legal exposure for doing their jobs....
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read