Over 40K Voters Sign Petition in Support of Nonpartisan Elections in South Dakota

Published: 12 Nov, 2015
3 min read

Voters in South Dakota may have an opportunity to change the way elections are conducted in their state. TakeItBack.org submitted over 40,000 signatures to South Dakota's secretary of state Monday in favor of a ballot initiative that would implement nonpartisan, top-two primaries in the state similar to the election model used for state legislative races in Nebraska.

There are three states with some form of nonpartisan, top-two system. California and Washington state use a similar system for all statewide and congressional races. All voters and candidates, regardless of their party affiliation, participate on a single primary ballot and the top two vote-getters move on to the general election

The difference between the systems in these two states and Nebraska is state legislative candidates do not run under a party banner in Nebraska. The initiative proposed in South Dakota would add an amendment to the state constitution that replicates this election model for all statewide and congressional elections.

In order to qualify for the November 2016 ballot, TakeItBack.org had to submit at least 27,741 valid signatures. The group well surpassed this goal and now waits for the secretary of state's office to validate the signatures.

"We were delighted to reach and exceed our goal--we thought 35,000 signatures would be the absolute top end that we could get, especially because we only had two months to get them in, and South Dakota is a small population state with a widely dispersed citizenry," said Drey Samuelson, co-founder of TakeItBack.org.

"The fact that we went far beyond what seemed like a very high goal is proof that folks here are ready for nonpartisan change, and if they respond in November of next year just as they did this year, that's exactly the gift that they'll get."

Samuelson said that with the signatures submitted, the group's focus has already shifted to putting together a more extensive campaign plan, figuring out coalitions, and other ways to build support in the long road to November 2016.

To date, the nonpartisan elections initiative has not encountered much opposition. However, the South Dakota Republican Party did take a shot at the proposal Monday on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/sdgop/status/663766724081094656

Samuelson said it is almost a given that the state's Republican Party will continue to oppose the initiative, but expects the Democratic Party to stay neutral. Though he says it is possible for outside groups and big spenders to throw money in opposition to the initiative -- citing the Koch brother's 2012 role in killing top-two in Arizona -- he remains optimistic that voters will continue to respond favorably to the election reform.

IVP Donate

"If we have sufficient resources to get our message out [...] we'll win--the momentum for nonpartisan change is much, much greater than any enthusiasm that exists for the tired, partisan system which so obviously is no longer working in this state or country," he explained.

TakeItBack.org is a nonpartisan organization founded by Samuelson and Richard Weiland. The group is dedicated to using “the initiative and referendum process to advance needed political and policy reforms to take our government back from the stranglehold of wealthy special interests,” and aims to recreate a government by the people and for the people.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read