Michigan's Capital May Be Denied Right to Decide Its Own Elections

Published: 29 Jul, 2021
1 min read

The Lansing City Council agreed in July to put a question on the November ballot that would make the switch to ranked choice voting. However, now the same council members that said residents could decide for themselves how elections are conducted in the city may pull the initiative.

Why? Well, the council received a letter from Michigan Elections Director Jonathan Brater, who argued that the state’s constitution would need to be amended to allow ranked choice voting. The clerk of Ingham County, which Lansing is mostly located in, also said the state’s election equipment would need to be updated to support ranked choice voting.

Rank MI Vote, however, disagrees. The ranked choice voting advocacy group says Lansing is a “home rule” city, which means it is allowed greater autonomy to decide local solutions at the local level. It’s important to note that all cities in Michigan fall under this category now, meaning under state law, cities have the authority to amend their charter however they deem necessary.

The only requirement to change the city’s charter is voter approval.

Lansing would also not be the first city to adopt ranked choice voting. Eastpointe, Michigan, uses a proportional form of ranked choice voting to decide city elections. The reform was adopted to settle a civil rights challenge brought by the US Department of Justice, which accepted ranked choice voting as a remedy to discriminatory electoral systems.

Learn more about the history of ranked choice voting in Eastpointe here

Lansing would also not be the first to adopt ranked choice voting by ballot initiative. Ferndale voters approved its use in 2004. While the city has not yet implemented the voting method, no challenge has overturned the decision made by voters.

You Might Also Like

Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read
Utah state capitol.
Utah Judge Delivers a Major Blow to Gerrymandering
A Utah state judge has struck down the congressional map drawn by Republican lawmakers, ruling that it violates the state’s voter-approved ban on partisan gerrymandering and ordering new district lines for the 2026 elections....
11 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read