With Louisiana in Play, Candidates Even Less Likely to Care About Your Vote in 2016

image
David YeeDavid Yee
Published: 30 Nov, 2015
2 min read

Historically, presidential races have come down to only a handful of toss-up states being the difference between victory and defeat -- the red/blue map has become fairly well-defined.

Enter John Bel Edwards (D) who won the governorship of Louisiana on November 21 by a fairly resounding margin, capturing 54 percent of the vote.

State governorships can give a glimpse into the 'at-large' intentions of a state, but this is hardly a sure thing in politics.

Louisiana has a long history, since WWII, of flipping allegiances between Democrats and Republicans for president -- currently in the longest Republican streak since George W. Bush in 2000.

If the gubernatorial race has any predictive powers, it is that the Republicans are going to have a harder race than originally anticipated.

With most analysts predicting 10 or fewer toss-up states, the electoral college map heavily favors the Democrats in 2016.

While Louisiana lost a critical electoral vote after Hurricane Katrina, due to population shifts, its 8 votes are critical in almost every winning combination for the Republicans. With 10 toss-ups, they have 72 winning combinations. However, without Louisiana, this drops to only 55.

Neither party likes to pour money into a state that they have held securely for 16 years, but Louisiana voters can likely expect a non-stop battle over the airwaves in 2016, and possibly more campaign stops than usual.

The ripple effect will likely be felt throughout the election map. If the parties (especially the Democrats) decide to make Louisiana a contested state, then there are really only 3 other toss-up states that matter to the Republicans -- Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida. Losing any two of them destroys any chances at 270 electoral votes for the Republicans if Louisiana falls.

IVP Donate

Even with a clean-sweep of the largest prizes, the Republicans still come up 20 votes shy of 270.

In 2012, the candidates campaigned to the 10 swing states--Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia, and Wisconsin--and ignored the rest of the country. More than six-times the money was spent in Florida than in the 40 ignored states combined.

While this was bad, could it get even worse if only 4 states really mattered for the presidential race?

Image: La. Governor-elect John Bel Edwards (D) 

You Might Also Like

Will the Texas Republican Party be Successful Where the Hawaiian Democratic Party Failed?
Will the Texas Republican Party be Successful Where the Hawaiian Democratic Party Failed?
The Republican Party of Texas (RPT) is suing Secretary of State Jane Nelson in an effort to close the state’s primary elections to party members only – a move that the Democratic Party of Hawaii (DPH) tried back in 2013 in its state and failed. ...
05 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Retired Attorney Takes Voting Rights Case All the Way to the Supreme Court -- By Himself
The next big voting rights case the Supreme Court of the United States could consider wasn’t filed by the ACLU, the League of Women Voters, Common Cause, or another household name when it comes to voter rights. ...
09 Sep, 2025
-
5 min read
congress flag
Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians
There may be no greater indication that voters are not being listened to in the escalating redistricting war between the Republican and Democratic Parties than a new poll from NBC News that shows 8-in-10 Americans want the parties to stop....
10 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read