Let All Voters Vote: Extending Equal Voting Rights to Independents

image
Published: 02 Jul, 2019
Updated: 15 Aug, 2022
2 min read

There is no right more deeply embedded into our country’s identity than the right to vote. It is so valued by US citizens that 91% say the right to vote is essential to their own sense of personal freedom.

This country was founded on the notion that we should always have a government by the people and for the people. And, as our nation has evolved, so has our conception of the right to vote and to whom this right is extended.

So what does the right to vote mean for the 26 million Americans who are denied equal and meaningful access to the ballot because they choose not to affiliate with the Republican or Democratic Party?

How is it that a person’s right to a meaningful vote is conditioned on being a member of a private political party? Under the constitution, it shouldn’t.

“Meaningful political participation requires the opportunity to influence electoral outcomes and cannot be predicated by one’s membership in one of the two major political parties, “ write Jeremy Gruber, Harry Kresky, and Michael Hardy.

Their work,  “Let All Voters Vote: Independents and the Expansion of Voting Rights in the United States,” was just published in the Touro Law Review. Gruber is senior vice president of Open Primaries, Kresky is general counsel for IndependentVoting,org, and Hardy is executive vice president and general counsel for National Action Network.

“[E]qual protection is violated ‘when the electoral system is arranged in a manner that will consistently degrade a voter’s or a group of voters’ influence in the political process,’” they add.

More and more voters are choosing to register outside the political parties. Yet, in many states, this means they are giving up their right to equal influence in elections because they are denied the ability to cast a meaningful vote in critical primary elections.

“Let All Voters Vote” takes a comprehensive legal look at the history of primary elections, the right to vote in them, the consequences of a system controlled by a duopoly, and the current fight to extend equal voting rights to all voters, regardless of party affiliation.

IVP Donate

Read the full law review here:

Latest articles

Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read
A man filling out his election ballot.
Oregon Activist Sues over Closed Primaries: 'I Shouldn't Have to Join a Party to Have a Voice'
A new lawsuit filed in Oregon challenges the constitutionality of the state’s closed primary system, which denies the state’s largest registered voting bloc – independent voters – access to taxpayer-funded primary elections. The suit alleges Oregon is denying the voters equal voting rights...
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Supreme Court Sides with Federal Corrections Officers in Lawsuit Over Prison Incident
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 30 that federal prison officers and officials cannot be sued by an inmate who accused them of excessive force during a 2021 incident, delivering a victory for federal corrections personnel concerned about rising legal exposure for doing their jobs....
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read