Let All Voters Vote: Extending Equal Voting Rights to Independents

image
Created: 02 Jul, 2019
Updated: 15 Aug, 2022
2 min read

There is no right more deeply embedded into our country’s identity than the right to vote. It is so valued by US citizens that 91% say the right to vote is essential to their own sense of personal freedom.

This country was founded on the notion that we should always have a government by the people and for the people. And, as our nation has evolved, so has our conception of the right to vote and to whom this right is extended.

So what does the right to vote mean for the 26 million Americans who are denied equal and meaningful access to the ballot because they choose not to affiliate with the Republican or Democratic Party?

How is it that a person’s right to a meaningful vote is conditioned on being a member of a private political party? Under the constitution, it shouldn’t.

“Meaningful political participation requires the opportunity to influence electoral outcomes and cannot be predicated by one’s membership in one of the two major political parties, “ write Jeremy Gruber, Harry Kresky, and Michael Hardy.

Their work,  “Let All Voters Vote: Independents and the Expansion of Voting Rights in the United States,” was just published in the Touro Law Review. Gruber is senior vice president of Open Primaries, Kresky is general counsel for IndependentVoting,org, and Hardy is executive vice president and general counsel for National Action Network.

“[E]qual protection is violated ‘when the electoral system is arranged in a manner that will consistently degrade a voter’s or a group of voters’ influence in the political process,’” they add.

More and more voters are choosing to register outside the political parties. Yet, in many states, this means they are giving up their right to equal influence in elections because they are denied the ability to cast a meaningful vote in critical primary elections.

“Let All Voters Vote” takes a comprehensive legal look at the history of primary elections, the right to vote in them, the consequences of a system controlled by a duopoly, and the current fight to extend equal voting rights to all voters, regardless of party affiliation.

More Choice for San Diego

Read the full law review here:

Latest articles

Stacked US currency
Utah Senate Majority Leader Introduces Resolution to Protect State Sovereignty, Combat Foreign Influence in Elections
Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore last week introduced a resolution in support of a constitutional amendment designed to restore states' authority to regulate campaign finance laws. The announcement came just days before the anniversary of the infamous Citizens United Supreme Court ruling....
20 Jan, 2025
-
2 min read
Phone with the TikTok logo on it.
US vs TikTok: The Politics of Data Privacy and Free Speech
At the time of this recording, a controversial law imposing heavy fines on companies providing access to TikTok was set to take effect, effectively banning the app for US users....
20 Jan, 2025
-
1 min read
Brick wall with a sign that says Republicans did it on the left, They did it in the middle, and Democrats did it on the right.
To Overcome Our Divides, We Must Try to Understand the Other Side’s Anger
After the election, I’ve been listening carefully to the people in our community. I’ve listened to Democratic voters distraught at Trump’s election, who can’t understand how so many people could vote for someone like him....
16 Jan, 2025
-
5 min read