In CA: Historic Independent Growth Underscores Need for New Presidential Primary Rules

image
Published: 12 Mar, 2019
Updated: 14 Aug, 2022
2 min read

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla published the latest voter registration numbers on Monday, March 11. Secretary Padilla touted record-setting registration of over 20 million people, nearly 30% of which are registered No Party Preference (i.e. independent).

The latest registration numbers, dated for February 10, show that NPP voters now comprise 28.26% of the registered voting population, an increase of 226,058 voters from the last registration report dated October 22, 2018.

Meanwhile, registration for both major parties continues to drop. Democratic registration slipped slightly from 43.45% to 43.11%. The Republican Party fell to 23.57%, down from 24.04% in October.

“IVP continues to be impressed with the increase in voters choosing no party preference.  It’s time for the legislature to recognize this and increase the NPP members on the Citizens Redistricting Commission and provide independent voters with their own ballot for the 2020 Presidential Primary,” says Dan Howle, executive director and chair of the Independent Voter Project.

The Independent Voter Project offered a solution to give every voter an equal opportunity to express their preference for president ahead of the 2016 primaries. It was simple: Secretary Padilla, as the top elections official in the state, could add a “public ballot” for voters who couldn’t or didn’t want to vote in a party’s primary.

The Independent Voter Project warned Secretary Padilla that there would be problems in the 2016 presidential primaries. He refused to use his authority to act, and a resolution brought before lawmakers offering the public ballot solution never made it out of committee.

ALSO READ: California Secretary of State’s Office Fails Voters

And the 2016 primaries? From provisional ballots to registration confusion to voters being sent the wrong presidential ballot, there are many California voters who were left frustrated, confused, or left out completely.

The most significant change California lawmakers made ahead of the 2020 primaries was moving the date up from June to March, making the state much more relevant in deciding who ends up becoming the nominee in both parties.

IVP Donate

This move will also most certainly have an effect on turnout, a greater share of which will be NPP voters. Unless the presidential primary rules are changed, the problems of the 2016 primary will likely be exacerbated in 2020.

Latest articles

A man filling out his election ballot.
Oregon Activist Sues over Closed Primaries: 'I Shouldn't Have to Join a Party to Have a Voice'
A new lawsuit filed in Oregon challenges the constitutionality of the state’s closed primary system, which denies the state’s largest registered voting bloc – independent voters – access to taxpayer-funded primary elections. The suit alleges Oregon is denying the voters equal voting rights...
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Supreme Court Sides with Federal Corrections Officers in Lawsuit Over Prison Incident
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 30 that federal prison officers and officials cannot be sued by an inmate who accused them of excessive force during a 2021 incident, delivering a victory for federal corrections personnel concerned about rising legal exposure for doing their jobs....
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Marijuana plant.
Why the War on Cannabis Refuses to Die: How Boomers and the Yippies Made Weed Political
For much of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, American physicians freely prescribed cannabis to treat a wide range of ailments. But by the mid-twentieth century, federal officials were laying the groundwork for a sweeping criminal crackdown. Cannabis would ultimately be classified as a Schedule I substance, placed alongside heroin and LSD, and transformed into a political weapon that shaped American policy for the next six decades....
30 Jun, 2025
-
2 min read