Former Idaho AG Condemns Baseless Fearmongering over Open Primaries Initiative

voted
Photo by Visuals on Unsplash.
Created: 26 Aug, 2024
3 min read

Former Idaho Attorney General Jim Jones pushed back against claims that nonpartisan open primaries would lead to gun control in a recent op-ed in the Idaho Press – calling it a fear mongering tactic that has no basis in reality.

“[Greg] Pruett, who operates a variety of propaganda outlets (all of which have “donate” buttons), admits that the OPI (open primaries initiative) is not a direct threat to gun rights,” Jones writes.

“He claims it’s an indirect threat because it will ‘make Idaho more like California.’ What Pruett is really concerned about is the fact that the OPI will break the stranglehold that his extremist allies have over who gets elected to public office.”

He added that “voters can rest easy. There is absolutely no evidence to support the claim that the OPI will cause gun control. Neither will it cause warts or male pattern baldness. It will only cause good government in the Gem State”

Idaho voters will have a chance to overhaul their election system in November. A proposition, placed on the ballot by Idahoans for Open Primaries, would implement a nonpartisan Top 4 primary with ranked choice voting in the general election.

This system may have evolved from the nonpartisan Top 2 system in California, but it mirrors the Top 4 model Alaska voters approved in 2020. In nonpartisan primaries, all voters and candidates participate on a single ballot, regardless of party or lack thereof.

It would grant access to the most critical stage of the elections process to nearly 300,000 independent voters and voters registered outside the Republican and Democratic Parties.

Idaho is largely a one-party state. Fifty-nine (59) of the 70 seats in the state House of Representatives are held by Republicans. Its entire congressional delegation (for House and Senate) are Republicans.

Republicans winning won’t change under a nonpartisan open primary system. Research supports Jones’ claim that Top 4 will mostly temper the political extremes and prevent only a minority of voters from dictating electoral outcomes.

More Choice for San Diego

A research team looked at the 2022 electoral outcomes in Alaska, which was the first election cycle the state used its Top 4 with RCV system. What they found was not only is the system supported by a majority of voters, but it also produced cross-partisan results.

Republican US Sen Lisa Murkowski, for example, won re-election because she had support from Republicans, independents, and a small group of Democrats. She beat out the more ideologically extreme Kelly Tshibaka.

Under the old, closed partisan primary system, Tshibaka would likely have won because Murkowski would not have made it out of the low-turnout primaries – giving voters a candidate that did not have the same broad appeal.

And thus, a minority of the electorate would have decided the outcome. 

The political landscape in Idaho shows that nearly all elections are decided in the primary stage, meaning that in a system in which political parties can determine who can vote in these taxpayer-funded elections, the dominant political party and its allied special interests have the most influence over electoral outcomes.

This is why those who benefit from the status quo will not only fight nonpartisan election reform, but will also make claims that it will lead to radical policy shifts, such as gun control in a state where that is all but impossible.

Jones, a Republican, is not only a former state attorney general. He is also a former justice on the Idaho Supreme Court. He asserts that gun control policies couldn't happen because of state constitutional provisions.

“The Idaho Constitution contains a strong prohibition against gun controls,” he writes.

More Choice for San Diego

“Article 1, Section 11, proclaims: ‘The people have the right to keep and bear arms, which shall not be abridged.’ That cannot be changed without a constitutional amendment, which would require a two-thirds vote of each House and then a majority of Idaho voters.”

The nonpartisan primary proposal in Idaho has support from several Republicans, including Jones, former Gov. Butch Otter, former state GOP Vice-Chair Sandy Patano, former Lieutenant Governor Jack Riggs, and a long list of lawmakers and other public officials and civil servants.

In this article

Related articles

Image of voters at a polling location.
Bill Filed to Close Indiana's Critical Primary Elections
Photo by  Indiana lawmakers will consider a bill filed in the state's House of Representatives that ...
07 Jan, 2025
-
2 min read
voted
Will Congress Grant Independent Voters Full Voting Rights in 2025?
While all eyes are on the speakers vote Friday, a bipartisan coalition of US lawmakers plan to re-in...
03 Jan, 2025
-
2 min read
voters at the ballot box.
4 Principles of Change Open Primary Advocates Must Embrace
Editor's Note: This op-ed in the Fulcrum and has been republished on IVN with permission from the p...
23 Dec, 2024
-
5 min read

Latest articles

Voter with glasses filling out their ballot.
Gallup: National Independent ID Remains at Record High
Gallup has released its annual look back at what party affiliation looked like in the previous year. What it found was independent ID remained steady at a record-high 43% from 2023 to 2024....
21 Jan, 2025
-
1 min read
Stacked US currency
Utah Senate Majority Leader Introduces Resolution to Protect State Sovereignty, Combat Foreign Influence in Elections
Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore last week introduced a resolution in support of a constitutional amendment designed to restore states' authority to regulate campaign finance laws. The announcement came just days before the anniversary of the infamous Citizens United Supreme Court ruling....
20 Jan, 2025
-
2 min read
Phone with the TikTok logo on it.
US vs TikTok: The Politics of Data Privacy and Free Speech
At the time of this recording, a controversial law imposing heavy fines on companies providing access to TikTok was set to take effect, effectively banning the app for US users....
20 Jan, 2025
-
1 min read