Despite USA Freedom Act, Fight against Government Spying Far from Over

Carl WicklanderCarl Wicklander
Published: 21 Sep, 2015
2 min read
A lawsuit against the National Security Agency's (

NSA) data collection remains in limbo even as the legal landscape has changed and more private companies have been suspected of collecting data.

Represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), First Unitarian Church v. NSA challenges the constitutionality of the NSA's mass collection of phone records on First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment grounds. Filed in 2013, the case has not been heard or dismissed.

The passage of the USA Freedom Act in the summer was expected by many to end the practice of mass data collection. Its passage led some to consider whether it might render cases such as First Unitarian Church moot. Instead, under the new law, which takes effect in November, telecommunications companies will hold users' data until the government asks for it.

The EFF now alleges that Verizon, Sprint, and AT&T have also participated in the NSA's mass collection. The group says this happened when the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) declassified findings that the companies participated when a "compliance incident" was reported involving those companies. With this revelation, data collection programs appear to be operating with assistance from more telecommunications companies than previously confirmed.

In a weekend editorial in World Affairs, Cindy Cohn, executive director of the EFF, explicated the importance of First Unitarian Church and other NSA lawsuits. Arguing against the common allegation that anyone with nothing to hide has nothing to fear, Cohn says without the freedom of association, people will be more reluctant to get involved with politics:

"In the civil rights era the Supreme Court held that the NAACP did not have to turn over its membership lists - its associational information - to the government of Alabama as a condition of opening an office there. The Court's argument was straightforward: people simply won't join legal, political or social change movements if they know that they could be exposed to a potentially hostile government's prying eyes."

Though its limbo status is puzzling, First Unitarian Church could still be dismissed or continued to be ignored. The passage of the USA Freedom Act could render lawsuits against the government's collection of data futile when the government is no longer holding that data as of November. However, the government continues to decline hearing citizens' concerns about what is happening with their data.

Photo Credit: Carsten Reisinger / Shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read