California Energy Policy Unfairly Burdens Middle Class Households

image
Lucas EavesLucas Eaves
Published: 27 Jun, 2013
2 min read

Energy has long been a highly disputed issue in California and the upcoming rise in prices this summer will certainly discontent many Californians.

In California, utility companies do not have real control over the amount they can charge their customers. This is the result of a bill, Indeed,  passed by the California legislature following the famous 2000/2001 energy crisis, that prevents the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) from altering the energy rates.

Under the current system, the price system is calculated according to an energy consumption baseline. Consumers under that baseline, low income families, people living in apartment buildings, pay less for their energy and are also protected from any increase in prices. Consumers above these baselines, large households, businesses, logically pay more but without the same protection have seen their bill increase significantly over the years.

Indeed, over last 12 years California's energy costs have risen for a number of reasons:

  • Millions of dollars have been invested in infrastructures,
  • Public and private utilities have to pay a carbon tax under California's cap and trade
  • Regulations requiring 33 percent of California's energy be renewable by 2020 have forced utility companies to rely on costlier renewable sources.

Because of the fixed energy rate system, the increase in prices has not been fairly allocated. Most of the increase has been endured by only 30 percent of all consumers, who have seen their bill go up by as much as 100 percent.

This summer, utilities companies will be compelled to raise their prices once more, by 30 to 40 percent. The increase will affect the same consumers, many of which are middle class families, who are already paying more than their share for their energy.

However, this outcome is not irremediable. The legislature is currently considering AB 327, a bill introduced by Assemblymember Henry Perea, that would end the fixed rate structure and would allow the CPUC to develop a fairer rate structure that meets California’s energy needs as efficiently as possible.

The following infrographic was provided by Fix My Energy Bill.

Credit: Fixmyenergybill.com

California Energy Policy

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

National Reform Organizations Condemn Texas and California Over Gerrymandering
National Reform Organizations Condemn Texas and California Over Gerrymandering
The United States has passed the point of no return in the unprecedented mid-cycle redistricting fight between Texas and California, which threatens to expand to other states like Republican-controlled Florida and Democratic-controlled New York....
25 Aug, 2025
-
6 min read
Gerrymandering Wars Escalate Beyond Texas and California: A National Race to the Bottom?
Gerrymandering Wars Escalate Beyond Texas and California: A National Race to the Bottom?
Republicans currently hold a narrow 219 to 212 edge over Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives, with four vacancies: three from Democratic members who have died and one from a Republican who has resigned. This is the smallest House majority held by either party in nearly a century. The razor-thin margin means the stakes in the 2026 midterms could not be higher. With so few competitive seats left nationwide, both parties are turning to mid-decade redistricting as a way to secure advantages....
27 Aug, 2025
-
10 min read
Hand in ballot that says independent on it.
Why 1.2 Million California Independents Are The Biggest Wild Card in American Politics Today
The fate of Proposition 50, California’s proposed redistricting measure, may come down to voters who have declined to join one of the two major political parties....
22 Aug, 2025
-
5 min read