Skip to content
Subscribe

2024 Recap: Lessons Learned from the Successes and Failures of Statewide Primary Reform

In 2024, a historic number of statewide initiatives appeared on the ballot to open primary elections to all voters and candidates. Most of the initiatives failed, but reformers were successful in Washington DC. 

2024 Recap: Lessons Learned from the Successes and Failures of Statewide Primary Reform
Photo by Eduardo Ramos on Unsplash. Unsplash+ license obtained by author.
Published:

Photo by Eduardo Ramos on Unsplash

In 2024, a historic number of statewide initiatives appeared on the ballot to open primary elections to all voters and candidates. Most of the initiatives failed, but reformers were successful in Washington DC.

The nonpartisan group Open Primaries hosted its last virtual discussion of 2024 to recap what happened in the 6 states where nonpartisan primary initiatives failed and why DC saw success.

Put simply, reform leaders understand the need for a robust voter education campaign and a committed ground team that will speak directly to voters and explain why primary reform is needed.

"The critical combo is years of public education, then you run a campaign, followed by years of public education," said John Opdycke, host of the discussion and president of Open Primaries.

The remarks are similar to those made by Andy Moore of the National Association of Nonpartisan Reformers in an interview for IVN.

Getting through to voters can take time because of all the noise in a hyper-connected world. One reason reform not only passed, but passed with an overwhelming majority in DC is the campaign went directly to voters.

"We were very scrappy, and we said we are going to everywhere to everyone," said Lisa Rice, who proposed and spearheaded Initiative 83 in DC.  "There are people who said, 'You know, I have lived in this neighborhood for 30 years. No one has ever knocked on my door.'"

"That was part of our tagline: Make them work hard for your vote."

Here is Open Primaries' description of the conversation:

"In poll after poll, open primaries consistently get 70%+ of the public’s support but translating that support into votes is not automatic. It takes work – a lot of work. Both parties oppose us and they’ve become experts at sowing doubt among voters. Our final Primary Buzz Discussion of the year will be a deep dive into where we are right now as a movement: what’s working? What’s not? How can we effectively grow in 2025 to set us up for success in 2026.

Featuring: Lisa Rice (All Votes Count DC/Yes on 83), Juli Lucky (Alaskans for Better Elections/Vote No on 2), Sarah Smallhouse & Chuck Coughlin (Make Elections Fair AZ/Yes on Prop 140)."

Check out the full discussion above.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

2024 Recap: Lessons Learned from the Successes and Failures of Statewide Primary Reform

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us