With 10 Million Votes, Proposition 36 Takes Effect in California, Ushering in New Approach to Drug and Theft Crimes

A person cuffed.
Photo by Curated Lifestyle on Unsplash. Unsplash+ license obtained by author.
Published: 24 Mar, 2025
Updated: 18 Jun, 2025
3 min read

In November 2024, California voters in all 58 counties approved Proposition 36, known as the "Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act," with approximately 68.4% in favor. ​ 

Treatment-Mandated Felonies

The new law took effect on December 18, 2024, and California prosecutors are now charging people convicted of various third-time drug offenses with a “treatment-mandated felony,” which would direct them to substance use disorder or mental health treatment or face up to three years in jail or prison. 

According to CalMatters, as of Feb. 4, nearly 30 people have been charged with the treatment-mandated felony in Yolo County. In Stanislaus County, roughly 140 people have been charged with the new felony as of Feb. 10. And in Orange County, that number has passed 500 as of Feb. 7.

Legislative Support and Implementation

Sen. Tom Umberg, a Democrat from Santa Ana, recently introduced legislation to help facilitate the implementation of Prop. 36.  “Every Californian should be treated equally under the law,” said Umberg. “It is my intent to make sure we fulfill the mandate of Prop. 36,” he said.

Prop 36 requires some felonies to be served in prison. Sentences for selling certain drugs (such as fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, or methamphetamine) can be lengthened based on the amount sold.

Before the law was passed, these sentences were served in county jail or state prison, depending on the person’s criminal history.  Other key provisions being implemented include:

Increased Penalties for Theft Crimes

The measure allows prosecutors to file felony charges for thefts under $950 if the defendant has two or more prior theft convictions. It also increases penalties for organized theft activities, such as "smash-and-grab" crimes involving three or more individuals acting together. ​

Alexandra’s Law

A bill Umberg carried last year – SB 44 – was part of Proposition 36 as approved by 3 out of every four California voters.  Known as Alexandra’s Law, after an overdose victim, California courts are now required to warn individuals convicted of selling or providing specific drugs (such as fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine) that they could be charged with murder if they distribute drugs that result in someone's death. ​

Here is the court warning message:

IVP Donate

“You are hereby advised that all illicit drugs and counterfeit pills are dangerous to human life and become even deadlier when they are, sometimes unknowingly, mixed with substances such as fentanyl and analogs of fentanyl. People can and have died from these substances, even in very small doses. It is extremely dangerous and deadly to human life to sell or administer drugs, in any form, when not lawfully authorized to do so. If you do so in the future and a person dies as a result of that action, and you knew or should have known that the substance you provided contained fentanyl or a fentanyl analog, you may be charged with homicide, up to and including the crime of murder, within the meaning of Section 187 of the Penal Code.” Code. In addition, this conviction will be considered by a judge or jury as to whether you knew or should have known that the substance you provided to the decedent contained fentanyl.”

Supported by Democrats, Republicans and Independents

Proposition 36 garnered support from Democrats, Republicans and independents and various groups, including law enforcement organizations, public employee unions, correctional officers, big retailers like Home Depot, and the Family Business Association of California.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Northern and Southern California, Governor Gavin Newsom, and the California Democratic Party opposed the measure. 

Related articles

Supreme Court building.
Supreme Court Sides with Federal Corrections Officers in Lawsuit Over Prison Incident
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 30 that federal prison officers and officials cannot be sued by an inmate who accused them of excessive force during a 2021 incident, delivering a victory for federal corrections personnel concerned about rising legal exposure for doing their jobs....
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
How It Really Works Health Care Behind Bars
Health Care Behind Bars - How It Really Works
The health care crisis behind bars affects two distinct but deeply connected groups: incarcerated individuals and correctional officers. While incarcerated people are constitutionally entitled to care, access remains inconsistent, and most enter custody with significant medical and mental health needs. They face higher rates of chronic illness, infectious disease, and psychiatric conditions than the general public....
12 Jun, 2025
-
20 min read
An angel raising a key to prison bars.
More Than a Uniform: Remembering Annie Covarrubias and the Crisis Facing Correctional Officers
Last week, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) officials announced the sudden passing of Annie Covarrubias, a correctional officer at the Correctional Training Facility (CTF) in Soledad. She was 35 years old. In the words of her colleagues, Annie was a “dependable, professional, and kind” officer, known for her dedication to both her peers and the incarcerated individuals she worked with every day....
20 May, 2025
-
2 min read

Latest articles

CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read