What Californians Need to Know About Prop 8, the Fair Pricing for Dialysis Act

image
Published: 19 Oct, 2018
2 min read

California Prop 8 (2018) is a ballot initiative measure that, if passed, will require kidney dialysis clinics in California to make no more than 15% in profit markups over expenses from their operations.

Proposition 8 would set up a state committee to oversee its requirements, and force kidney dialysis clinics in the state to report revenues and expenses to the committee.

The state committee would then be responsible for collecting any amount of revenue these clinics make in excess of 115% of operating expenses that the proposition defines as a "fair treatment payment amount," and return that money as rebates to insurance companies (or to the patients themselves if they paid in cash).

The proposition defines the "fair treatment payment amount" as:

"...the sum of all direct patient care services costs and all health care quality improvement costs incurred by a governing entity and its chronic dialysis clinics."

Supporters of Prop 8 (2018), which was advanced by a powerful West Coast labor union, SEIU-UHW West (Service Employees International Union - United Health Workers West), say it's a round about way to force kidney dialysis clinics to hire more employees and spend more on improving services for patients.

They say California's kidney dialysis clinics, which serve 66,000 California residents with failing or missing kidneys every week, are dirty, understaffed, non-compliant with state health regulations, and don't offer enough translation services for residents who only speak Spanish or other languages. And they say the profits these clinics are making would be better spent on hiring more workers, training them better, and improving the quality and cleanliness of their facilities.

Their hope is that with the passage of Prop 8, these kidney dialysis companies would rather keep their money in their companies by improving their facilities and hiring more employees, than give it back to the insurance companies instead.

According to California's official voter information guide on ballot initiative measures, the PRO arguments for Prop 8 are:

"Dialysis is a life-saving treatment, but big dialysis corporations making huge profits don't invest enough in basic sanitation and patient care. YES ON 8 supports investment in quality patient care and stops overcharging that drives up costs for Californians. The California Democratic Party, veterans, healthcare advocates and religious leaders agree: Yes On 8."

IVP Donate

While the CON arguments against Prop 8 are:

Proposition 8 is OPPOSED by thousands of nurses, doctors, patients, the American Nurses Association\California, California Medical Association, American College of Emergency Physicians of CA because it would result in the closure of many dialysis clinics in California—dangerously reducing access to care, putting the lives of vulnerable dialysis patients at risk, and increasing costs for California taxpayers. Vote NO.

You Might Also Like

Trump sitting in the oval office with a piece of paper with a cannabis leaf on his desk.
Is Trump About to Outflank Democrats on Cannabis? Progressives Sound the Alarm
As President Donald Trump signals renewed interest in reclassifying cannabis from a Schedule I drug to Schedule III, a policy goal long championed by liberals and libertarians, the reaction among some partisan progressive advocates is not celebration, but concern....
08 Dec, 2025
-
5 min read
Malibu, California.
From the Palisades to Simi Valley, Independent Voters Poised to Decide the Fight to Replace Jacqui Irwin
The coastline that defines California’s mythology begins here. From Malibu’s winding cliffs to the leafy streets of Brentwood and Bel Air, through Topanga Canyon and into the valleys of Calabasas, Agoura Hills, and Thousand Oaks, the 42nd Assembly District holds some of the most photographed, most coveted, and most challenged terrain in the state. ...
10 Dec, 2025
-
6 min read
Ranked choice voting
Ranked Choice for Every Voter? New Bill Would Transform Every Congressional Election by 2030
As voters brace for what is expected to be a chaotic and divisive midterm election cycle, U.S. Representatives Jamie Raskin (Md.), Don Beyer (Va.), and U.S. Senator Peter Welch (Vt.) have re-introduced legislation that would require ranked choice voting (RCV) for all congressional primaries and general elections beginning in 2030....
10 Dec, 2025
-
3 min read