logo

New Research: Even Computers Can't Remove Human Bias from Redistricting

image
Author: Fair Vote
Created: 17 September, 2018
Updated: 17 October, 2022
2 min read
We let computers to determine our Facebook feeds and drive our cars. Why not let technology replace the political and personal interests of people when it comes to drawing district lines?In a recent column for Bridge Magazine, Eric Lupher, president of the Citizens Research Council of Michigan, considers whether a computer algorithm could indeed solve the problem of human influences on mapmaking.Michigan, which boasts some of the most egregiously gerrymandered districts in the country, is one of several states that will consider redistricting reform on November ballots. The proposal from citizen activist group Voters Not Politicians, seeks to end partisan lawmakers’ influence on elections by transferring district drawing power to a 13-member citizens commission with equal representation from Republicans, Democrats, and independent or third-party voters.Lupher proposes removing “human meddling” entirely from the process by creating a computer algorithm to draw districts.But in unpacking the idea, he finds new problems:

“Redistricting algorithms do not exist on a store shelf for the state to purchase and plug in the requisite number of districts into which the state should be sorted. Someone has to create the algorithm. And that person will bring some level of bias to the task.”

Then there’s the matter of what data to use in the algorithm. Plans for how to solve gerrymandering abound, which again requires a person to decide among the options a computer could generate.Which is why Luther concludes by posing a new question that Michigan voters must answer in the upcoming ballot question: “who should be responsible for choosing the criteria used in these algorithms and selecting the final output that will sort us as voters?”It’s a good question. The answer is the Fair Representation Act, a bill introduced in Congress that combines nonpartisan redistricting commissions with ranked choice voting and multi-winner districts to create fairer and democratic elections. We can end gerrymandering, no algorithm needed.Read his full column here.Editor's Note: This quick take originally published on FairVote's website. 

Photo Credit: ShotPrime / shutterstock.com

Latest articles

white house
Dear Pollsters: We Get It... The Race Is Tight
In this episode of Middleweight Politics, Dan and IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths discuss former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke's puzzling endorsement of Jill Stein, Democrat Mike Bennett's slightly more puzzling opposition to election reform in his state......
21 October, 2024
Frank Luntz
Frank Luntz: Neither Trump nor Harris Are Providing What Voters Truly Want
Political analyst and pollster Frank Luntz joined Foward Party Founder Andrew Yang on his most recent podcast to talk about the state of the 2024 presidential election, and what he's seeing from the data....
21 October, 2024
-
2 min read
Your Choice
Measure 117: Will Oregon Be the Next State to Adopt Ranked Choice Voting?
Two states currently use ranked choice voting at the state level (Maine and Alaska). This number could substantially change with RCV on the ballot in 4 states, including the red state Idaho, the purple state Colorado, and the blue state Oregon. ...
17 October, 2024
-
3 min read