Judge Strips Ambitious Anti-Corruption Amendment from Missouri Ballot

image
Published: 14 Sep, 2018
Updated: 17 Oct, 2022
3 min read

Update 9/17/18:  State Senator Rob Schaaf (R-St. Joseph), former State Senator Jim Lembke (R-Lemay) and former State Senator Bob Johnson (R-Lee's Summit) joined Common Cause in filing an amicus brief Saturday, calling on the courts to let the voters decide on the initiative:

"The will of the voters should determine who legislates and what influences legislative decisions. The Clean Missouri initiative seeks to enact this fundamental principle... The voters of Missouri rather than the courts should decide the fate of this important initiative."

MISSOURI - A judge has ordered that arguably the most ambitious and comprehensive anti-corruption, anti-gerrymandering, pro-transparency amendment proposed in 2018 be removed from the Missouri ballot.

The Cole County judge ruled Friday that the CLEAN Missouri amendment -- Amendment 1 -- covers too broad a scope and too many subjects, in violation of the state constitution:

“The Defendant and Intervenors-Defendants claimed that covering public officials in the executive or judicial branch, or public officials in county and local governments, is ‘properly connected’ with the single subject of the General Assembly,” Green wrote. “This Court decides that the inclusion of changes to multiple branches of government violates the guidelines and precedence articulated in .” - Judge Dan Green

CLEAN Missouri vowed immediate appeal, but the clock is ticking. The secretary of state says the 2018 Missouri ballot must be finalized by September 25.

"We'll be appealing immediately. The Secretary of State properly certified the measure so that voters may consider the measure, and voters will have their say on November 6," stated CLEAN Missouri attorney Chuck Hatfield.

"We have always thought that this legal matter would be decided at the Appeals Court level. This is a speed bump, but the law is on our side, the people are on our side, and Amendment 1 will be passed in November to clean up Missouri politics."

IVP Donate

The CLEAN Missouri amendment qualified for the November ballot after the campaign garnered over 340,000 signatures from voters. Here is a brief description of what the amendment does:

  • It requires legislative records to be open to the public.
  • It requires state politicians to wait at least two years before becoming lobbyists.
  • It would ban most lobbyist gifts in the state (anything more than $5).
  • It would lower campaign contribution limits for legislative candidates.
    • “Establish new campaign contribution limits for General Assembly candidates— $2,500 for state senate, and $2,000 for state house.”
    • “Limit the ability of individuals and organizations to circumvent caps by counting money from single-source committees towards totals for original, actual donors.”
    • “Stop legislative fundraising on state property.”

A representative from the CLEAN Missouri campaign told me that though the bill is indeed comprehensive, it was written to be narrowly-focused to the legislature, anticipating a legal challenge from opponents.

State Attorney General Josh Hawley filed a brief in the case, defending the secretary of state's certification of the ballot measure and rejecting the argument that it violated the state constitution's single-subject clause.

"IP 2018-048’s single subject, and central purpose, is to regulate limited aspects of the Missouri General Assembly and its members," he wrote.

"IP 2018-048’s [Initiative petition #2018-048, now known as Amendment 1] provisions all relate to the same readily-identifiable and narrow central purpose and do not violate the single-subject rule. The measure does not include the flaw that ultimately doomed the measure to fail in Missourians to Protect the Initiative Process."

Read more about the amendment and the case here.

Amendment 1 has received broad bipartisan support from not just voters, but Republican, Democratic, and independent reformers in the state, and a handful of newspapers.

Photo Credit: eurobanks / shutterstock.com

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

Latest articles

Marijuana plant.
Why the War on Cannabis Refuses to Die: How Boomers and the Yippies Made Weed Political
For much of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, American physicians freely prescribed cannabis to treat a wide range of ailments. But by the mid-twentieth century, federal officials were laying the groundwork for a sweeping criminal crackdown. Cannabis would ultimately be classified as a Schedule I substance, placed alongside heroin and LSD, and transformed into a political weapon that shaped American policy for the next six decades....
30 Jun, 2025
-
2 min read
Donald Trump standing behind presidential podium and in front of two American flags.
Has Trump Made His Case for the Nobel Peace Prize?
A news item in recent days that was overshadowed in the media by SCOTUS and the One Big Beautiful Budget Bill was a US-brokered peace agreement that was signed between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) – which if it holds will end a conflict between the two countries that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands of people....
30 Jun, 2025
-
7 min read
Picture of skyscraper in New York behind a bridge.
Knives Come Out Against Reform at NYC CRC Hearing as Independents Rise
Last week in Staten Island, the NYC Charter Revision Commission held its next-to-last public hearing. As Commissioner Diane Savino commented, addressing NYC's closed primary system “is the single biggest issue we’ve heard this year.”...
30 Jun, 2025
-
3 min read