Three-Judge Panel Strikes Down N.C. District Maps for Partisan Manipulation

image
Published: 27 Aug, 2018
Updated: 17 Oct, 2022
1 min read

A three-judge panel ruled Monday that North Carolina's congressional districts once again violated the US Constitution. This time, however, it was not on racial grounds -- but partisan.

The court further ruled that the maps may need to be redrawn ahead of the November elections, just a little over two months away.

North Carolina legislators are expected to ask the Supreme Court to intervene. The high court is short a justice after Anthony Kennedy's resignation.

Lower courts appear to be increasingly willing to rule on the partisan nature of electoral maps. However, the Supreme Court punted two cases this year for lack of standing, holding that the cases were more about partisan interests than individual legal rights.

"[T]his Court is not responsible for vindicating generalized partisan preferences. The Court’s constitutionally prescribed role is to vindicate the individual rights of the people appearing before it," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority in Gill v. Whitford.

In this case, the federal court ruled that the Republican Party unconstitutionally gerrymandered the congressional districts over Democrats -- at its core being the interest of two political parties and their members.

Stay tuned for further developments on this story.

Latest articles

Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read
A man filling out his election ballot.
Oregon Activist Sues over Closed Primaries: 'I Shouldn't Have to Join a Party to Have a Voice'
A new lawsuit filed in Oregon challenges the constitutionality of the state’s closed primary system, which denies the state’s largest registered voting bloc – independent voters – access to taxpayer-funded primary elections. The suit alleges Oregon is denying the voters equal voting rights...
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Supreme Court Sides with Federal Corrections Officers in Lawsuit Over Prison Incident
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 30 that federal prison officers and officials cannot be sued by an inmate who accused them of excessive force during a 2021 incident, delivering a victory for federal corrections personnel concerned about rising legal exposure for doing their jobs....
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read