California Legislature Passes Most Sweeping Privacy Protection in Country

image
Published: 28 Jun, 2018
2 min read

AB 375, the California Consumer Privacy Act bill, was unanimously passed by the California State Senate 36-0 and the California Assembly 69-0. The bill is expected to be signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown and will go into effect in 2020.

The action staves off a bruising campaign involving tech giants Google, Verizon, AT&T and Facebook who were prepared to spend by some accounts $100 million to defeat the privacy initiative that by all accounts, gives consumers more control over the collecting and sharing of their data.

California Consumer Privacy Act Tenets

The initiative received 625,000 signatures, almost twice the number required for an initiative to be included on the California ballot.

Three principles served as the basis of the ballot initiative:

  1. The right to know what personal information is being collected;
  2. The right to know what personal information is being sold and/or shared with third parties as well as the identity of those third parties; and
  3. The right to request that their personal information no longer be sold (i.e., the right to opt out).

In addition to the consumer rights above, businesses would be required to provide notice through their privacy policy regarding whether personal data is sold and instructions for opting out of the selling or sharing of this data.

Legislature Flexibility

One of the dynamics with the legislature passing the bill is it brings more flexibility to change the bill. Had it gone to the voters in November, it would have taken another initiative to amend any portion of the law. Sen. Joel Anderson of San Diego noted this, "technologies change and we need the flexibility to change with the industry. This bill is a great path because it allows flexibility that the initiative doesn't provide."

Cynics may argue that the big tech companies of today are the winners, because now they can wield control of the legislative process and pull back protections before the bill goes into effect in 2020.

Optimists may celebrate the uncharacteristically bipartisan recognition of California's constitutional protection of the individual right to privacy, which was unanimously codified by legislators from both sides of the aisle.

OK Google, how will this legislation affect our history?

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read