Stanford Researcher: Americans Aren't More Polarized; Only The Media and Political Elite Are

Stanford Researcher: Americans Aren't More Polarized; Only The Media and Political Elite Are
Published: 13 Feb, 2018
2 min read

A Stanford political scientist is stating what IVN has reported for a long time now: Americans are not more polarized, despite what the media says.

US voters are not being driven further to one corner or another in the ongoing political struggle between two private political corporations -- the Republican and Democratic Parties.

The people, largely, fall all over the political spectrum.

"You have two parties in a heterogeneous country where people have all kinds of views," says political scientist Morris Fiorina, in an interview for Reason Magazine. "It's simply not enough to represent diversity in this country."

Fiorina is also a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, and the author of Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate.

It is the media's reliance on a two-sided, "us-vs-them" narrative that has created the illusion that Americans are more divided than ever, when in reality Americans are embracing an independent path in greater numbers, and actually agree on several issues.

"Everybody worries about the average American being ensconced in a filter bubble," says Fiorina. "Most of the research suggests it's the elites who are in these filter bubbles...and have this biased view of the world."

Check out the full interview and read some of the transcript here.

One might ask why, then, are more candidates who cater to the extremes getting elected? I would advise people look into how these candidates are elected, specifically partisan primaries where only the most extreme in each party's base consistently vote and garner extremely low turnouts.

IVP Donate

Because of factors like partisan gerrymandering and electoral rules designed to protect the two-party duopoly, over 90 percent of elections nationwide are safe for one party or another.

Therefore, the elections are essentially decided in taxpayer-funded primary elections, which are controlled by the two dominant political parties.

When we look at the problem of hyper-partisanship in Washington and why candidates are catering more and more to the extreme, it is important to look at how these candidates are elected.

You Might Also Like

Why Neither Side Wants the Truth About Voter ID
Why Neither Side Wants the Truth About Voter ID
Voter ID is treated like a five-alarm fire in American politics. That reaction says more about our dysfunctional political system than it does about voter ID itself. ...
06 Feb, 2026
-
3 min read
Oklahoma Independents Drive Massive Push to Open Primaries With State Question 836
Oklahoma Independents Drive Massive Push to Open Primaries With State Question 836
While much of the U.S. was slammed with severe winter weather over the weekend, volunteers for Oklahoma State Question 836 – which would end the use of taxpayer-funded closed primaries – made a final push to get their campaign to over 200,000 petition signatures....
27 Jan, 2026
-
3 min read
NEW POLL: California Governor’s Race Sees “None of the Above” Beat the Entire Democratic Field
NEW POLL: California Governor’s Race Sees “None of the Above” Beat the Entire Democratic Field
A new statewide poll conducted by the Independent Voter Project finds California’s independent voters overwhelmingly support the state’s nonpartisan primary system and express broad dissatisfaction with the direction of state politics....
12 Jan, 2026
-
4 min read