Is Netflix Being Hypocritical About Net Neutrality?

image
Published: 15 Dec, 2017
1 min read

The FCC's net neutrality decision Thursday sent the online community in an uproar. Much of the visible response was outrage over the vote to scrap 2015 regulations that many think were necessary to secure a free and open internet.

Time will tell exactly what comes out of the decision. Lawsuits are being filed to challenge it, and individual states will move to enact their own net neutrality rules.

Netflix is one of many major content providers that opposes Thursday's FCC vote. The 2015 regulations were put in place to ensure ISPs treated all data delivered to companies equally. Opponents of removing these rules fear that ISPs will create multi-tier pricing systems that offer faster content, and throttle or block content for companies that pay more.

Charlie Kirk, founder and executive director of the conservative-leaning 501(c)(3) Turning Point USA, suggests Netflix's stance is hypocritical, considering its own pricing plan for subscribers.

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/941626940439650307

Netflix offers 3 subscription plans: Basic at $7.99/month, Standard at $10.99/month, and Premium at $13.99/month.

Unlimited movies and TV shows and the ability to watch Netflix on any device comes with all of the plans.

The difference between the plans specifically deals with how many screens customers can watch Netflix on at the same time and the quality of the content. Want HD? Customers need to pay more for that. Want Ultra HD? Gotta pay even more for that.

IVP Donate

Proponents of the FCC's decision, like Kirk, believe Netflix is hypocritical to say ISPs can't treat the quality of online content differently when it is doing just that.

Opponents of the FCC's decision argue that Kirk is looking at this completely wrong:

https://twitter.com/akammusic9995/status/941640911532056576

What do you think? Is Netflix being hypocritical? Or is this argument way off base?

Photo Credit: sitthiphong / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read