Gerrymandering Fallout: "The Worst Congressional Maps Ever"

Author: Fair Vote
Created: 02 October, 2017
Updated: 17 October, 2022
1 min read

As the Supreme Court prepares to hear oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford, the case against partisan gerrymandering, it can be helpful to look back at what led to the congressional district maps we have today.

In October, 2012, FairVote released an analysis of the 2011-2012 redistricting, part of Monopoly Politics 2012, titled "Redistricting 2012: The Worst Congressional Map Ever?"

The analysis highlighted how our hardened partisan voting, winner-take-all voting rules, and a remarkable feat of intentional gerrymandering led to a truly abnormal set of district maps, not only skewing results in favor of one political party, but also helping incumbents of both parties become more secure (and less accountable) in their seats.

The plaintiffs/appellees in Gill v. Whitford are only arguing against aggressive gerrymanders to help one political party win more seats. We agree that such gerrymanders violate the rights of voters.

However, it's worth noting that the incumbent-protecting gerrymanders found in this analysis also strike at the heart of our representative democracy.

The analysis includes a number of fascinating statistics. As just one example, we saw a clear pattern of incumbents in potentially competitive districts being protected by redistricting.

A total of 21 incumbents that won in 2010 by less than 10 percentage points saw their districts become at least 3 points safer. Only 7 such incumbents saw their districts become at least 3 points less safe.

True, 21 seats in a 435-seat body is only an effect at the margins, but in today's political environment, change at the margins can make all the difference.

IVP Existence Banner

Read FairVote's 2012 analysis:

Editor's note: This article, written by Drew Penrose, originally published on FairVote's website, and has been modified slightly for publication on IVN. 

Latest articles

Joe Biden
Opinion: Partisan Primaries Failed to Vet Joe Biden
This year’s Democratic Party presidential primary was a choreographed affair dubbed “Operation Bubble Wrap.” The rules were manipulated by party insiders to ensure Joe Biden would face no scrutiny and no competition. The idea that he should stay in the race because he “won the primary” is absurd. There was no primary. By design....
19 July, 2024
4 min read
RFK Jr Defeats DNC Challenge in North Carolina to Appear on Ballot
The North Carolina Board of Elections reversed an initial decision not to give independent candidate Robert F Kennedy's 'We the People' party ballot access in November....
17 July, 2024
2 min read
Voting Center
Report: More States Banned Ranked Choice Voting in 2024 Than Any Other Year
Ballotpedia released a report on the increased efforts in various states across the US to ban ranked choice voting, a popular nonpartisan reform that continues to gain momentum....
17 July, 2024
2 min read